Course record SPAN

SPAN 1010

Beginning Spanish 1

University of Colorado Boulder

1,691 grades61 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score44/100
Mixed record

Professors 61 of 61

Lucia N/A Escamilla Gonzalez 38 grades · 1 term 3.92GPA
94.7% A
5.3% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

38 letter grades

Compare with the course
Gonzalez vs. the course average
A +43.5
B −23.4
C −12.7
D −2.9
F −4.6

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 38 enrolled.

Diego Konig Gavassa De Almeida 57 grades · 1 term 3.66GPA
75.4% A
15.8% B
8.8% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

57 letter grades

Compare with the course
Almeida vs. the course average
A +24.2
B −12.8
C −3.9
D −2.9
F −4.6

Difference in percentage points.

1.7% withdrew · 1 of 58 enrolled.

Charles Toye 57 grades · 1 term 3.43GPA
63.2% A
19.3% B
15.8% C
1.8% D
0.0% F

57 letter grades

Compare with the course
Toye vs. the course average
A +11.9
B −9.3
C +3.1
D −1.1
F −4.6

Difference in percentage points.

5.0% withdrew · 3 of 60 enrolled.

Daniel Berjano Rodriguez 35 grades · 1 term 3.35GPA
48.6% A
42.9% B
5.7% C
2.9% D
0.0% F

35 letter grades

Compare with the course
Rodriguez vs. the course average
A −2.6
B +14.2
C −7.0
D same
F −4.6

Difference in percentage points.

2.8% withdrew · 1 of 36 enrolled.

Antonio Berbel Viudez 48 grades · 1 term 3.31GPA
52.1% A
33.3% B
12.5% C
0.0% D
2.1% F

48 letter grades

Compare with the course
Viudez vs. the course average
A +0.9
B +4.7
C −0.2
D −2.9
F −2.5

Difference in percentage points.

7.7% withdrew · 4 of 52 enrolled.

Karen L Malcolm 133 grades · 1 term 3.27GPA
53.4% A
29.3% B
16.5% C
0.8% D
0.0% F

133 letter grades

Compare with the course
Malcolm vs. the course average
A +2.2
B +0.7
C +3.8
D −2.1
F −4.6

Difference in percentage points.

2.9% withdrew · 4 of 137 enrolled.

Willow Julia Schram 38 grades · 1 term 3.27GPA
65.8% A
18.4% B
7.9% C
0.0% D
7.9% F

38 letter grades

Compare with the course
Schram vs. the course average
A +14.6
B −10.2
C −4.8
D −2.9
F +3.3

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 38 enrolled.

Elizabeth Huard 63 grades · 1 term 3.23GPA
47.6% A
38.1% B
11.1% C
1.6% D
1.6% F

63 letter grades

Compare with the course
Huard vs. the course average
A −3.6
B +9.5
C −1.6
D −1.3
F −3.0

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 63 enrolled.

Tyler William Short 35 grades · 1 term 3.15GPA
51.4% A
31.4% B
11.4% C
5.7% D
0.0% F

35 letter grades

Compare with the course
Short vs. the course average
A +0.2
B +2.8
C −1.3
D +2.8
F −4.6

Difference in percentage points.

5.4% withdrew · 2 of 37 enrolled.

Scott Alan Spanbauer 29 grades · 1 term 3.10GPA
55.2% A
27.6% B
6.9% C
3.4% D
6.9% F

29 letter grades

Compare with the course
Spanbauer vs. the course average
A +4.0
B −1.0
C −5.8
D +0.6
F +2.3

Difference in percentage points.

3.3% withdrew · 1 of 30 enrolled.

Anne Helen Becher 55 grades · 1 term 3.09GPA
40.0% A
41.8% B
16.4% C
1.8% D
0.0% F

55 letter grades

Compare with the course
Becher vs. the course average
A −11.2
B +13.2
C +3.6
D −1.1
F −4.6

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 55 enrolled.

Sandra Ortiz Valencia 36 grades · 1 term 3.09GPA
55.6% A
30.6% B
2.8% C
2.8% D
8.3% F

36 letter grades

Compare with the course
Valencia vs. the course average
A +4.3
B +1.9
C −9.9
D −0.1
F +3.8

Difference in percentage points.

7.7% withdrew · 3 of 39 enrolled.

Kelly Dawn Noe 153 grades · 1 term 3.08GPA
49.7% A
25.5% B
17.6% C
2.0% D
5.2% F

153 letter grades

Compare with the course
Noe vs. the course average
A −1.5
B −3.1
C +4.9
D −0.9
F +0.7

Difference in percentage points.

5.6% withdrew · 9 of 162 enrolled.

Kara Blye Copeland 74 grades · 1 term 3.03GPA
51.4% A
29.7% B
5.4% C
4.1% D
9.5% F

74 letter grades

Compare with the course
Copeland vs. the course average
A +0.1
B +1.1
C −7.3
D +1.2
F +4.9

Difference in percentage points.

2.6% withdrew · 2 of 76 enrolled.

Carlota Soto Abraham 36 grades · 1 term 3.03GPA
55.6% A
19.4% B
13.9% C
2.8% D
8.3% F

36 letter grades

Compare with the course
Abraham vs. the course average
A +4.3
B −9.2
C +1.2
D −0.1
F +3.8

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 36 enrolled.

Maria Del Carmen Vidal Garcia 34 grades · 1 term 3.02GPA
47.1% A
29.4% B
14.7% C
2.9% D
5.9% F

34 letter grades

Compare with the course
Garcia vs. the course average
A −4.2
B +0.8
C +2.0
D same
F +1.3

Difference in percentage points.

2.9% withdrew · 1 of 35 enrolled.

Rocio Gavira Dominguez 37 grades · 1 term 3.01GPA
48.6% A
24.3% B
18.9% C
0.0% D
8.1% F

37 letter grades

Compare with the course
Dominguez vs. the course average
A −2.6
B −4.3
C +6.2
D −2.9
F +3.6

Difference in percentage points.

2.6% withdrew · 1 of 38 enrolled.

Regina Gayou Tom 39 grades · 1 term 2.97GPA
51.3% A
28.2% B
5.1% C
5.1% D
10.3% F

39 letter grades

Compare with the course
Tom vs. the course average
A +0.1
B −0.4
C −7.6
D +2.2
F +5.7

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 39 enrolled.

Daniel Amarelo Montero 35 grades · 1 term 2.96GPA
54.3% A
17.1% B
20.0% C
0.0% D
8.6% F

35 letter grades

Compare with the course
Montero vs. the course average
A +3.1
B −11.5
C +7.3
D −2.9
F +4.0

Difference in percentage points.

7.9% withdrew · 3 of 38 enrolled.

Paola Berenice Allani 37 grades · 1 term 2.96GPA
45.9% A
21.6% B
24.3% C
2.7% D
5.4% F

37 letter grades

Compare with the course
Allani vs. the course average
A −5.3
B −7.0
C +11.6
D −0.2
F +0.9

Difference in percentage points.

2.6% withdrew · 1 of 38 enrolled.

Landon Byrns Helwig 34 grades · 1 term 2.93GPA
44.1% A
29.4% B
14.7% C
0.0% D
11.8% F

34 letter grades

Compare with the course
Helwig vs. the course average
A −7.1
B +0.8
C +2.0
D −2.9
F +7.2

Difference in percentage points.

5.6% withdrew · 2 of 36 enrolled.

Colleen P Dunne 34 grades · 1 term 2.85GPA
32.4% A
41.2% B
8.8% C
17.6% D
0.0% F

34 letter grades

Compare with the course
Dunne vs. the course average
A −18.9
B +12.6
C −3.9
D +14.7
F −4.6

Difference in percentage points.

8.1% withdrew · 3 of 37 enrolled.

Carrie Chorba Fross 36 grades · 1 term 2.85GPA
44.4% A
30.6% B
11.1% C
0.0% D
13.9% F

36 letter grades

Compare with the course
Fross vs. the course average
A −6.8
B +1.9
C −1.6
D −2.9
F +9.3

Difference in percentage points.

2.7% withdrew · 1 of 37 enrolled.

Virgilio Fernando Acevedo 55 grades · 1 term 2.84GPA
38.2% A
38.2% B
7.3% C
9.1% D
7.3% F

55 letter grades

Compare with the course
Acevedo vs. the course average
A −13.0
B +9.6
C −5.4
D +6.2
F +2.7

Difference in percentage points.

1.8% withdrew · 1 of 56 enrolled.

Geoffrey Miller 71 grades · 1 term 2.82GPA
38.0% A
32.4% B
14.1% C
9.9% D
5.6% F

71 letter grades

Compare with the course
Miller vs. the course average
A −13.2
B +3.8
C +1.4
D +7.0
F +1.1

Difference in percentage points.

6.6% withdrew · 5 of 76 enrolled.

Jose Luis N/A Toledano Llorente 36 grades · 1 term 2.81GPA
41.7% A
27.8% B
13.9% C
2.8% D
13.9% F

36 letter grades

Compare with the course
Llorente vs. the course average
A −9.5
B −0.8
C +1.2
D −0.1
F +9.3

Difference in percentage points.

2.7% withdrew · 1 of 37 enrolled.

Urszula Agnieszka Adamska 54 grades · 1 term 2.77GPA
37.0% A
27.8% B
18.5% C
9.3% D
7.4% F

54 letter grades

Compare with the course
Adamska vs. the course average
A −14.2
B −0.8
C +5.8
D +6.4
F +2.9

Difference in percentage points.

6.9% withdrew · 4 of 58 enrolled.

Myrnalejandra Canales-Gutierrez 17 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.71GPA
76.5% A
17.6% B
5.9% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

17 letter grades · Limited sample

5.6% withdrew · 1 of 18 enrolled.

Evelyn Nieto 21 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.68GPA
95.2% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
4.8% F

21 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 21 enrolled.

Jonatan Cantu Guerra 19 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.52GPA
63.2% A
31.6% B
5.3% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

19 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 19 enrolled.

Ana Isabel Rocha Santos 17 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.48GPA
70.6% A
23.5% B
0.0% C
5.9% D
0.0% F

17 letter grades · Limited sample

10.5% withdrew · 2 of 19 enrolled.

Viktoria Katherl 19 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.38GPA
52.6% A
42.1% B
5.3% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

19 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 19 enrolled.

Alex Felipe Bermudez Manjarres 19 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.35GPA
63.2% A
21.1% B
15.8% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

19 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 19 enrolled.

Robert Charles Pritchard 12 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.33GPA
50.0% A
33.3% B
16.7% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

12 letter grades · Limited sample

7.7% withdrew · 1 of 13 enrolled.

Madison Elyse Elson 18 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.27GPA
72.2% A
5.6% B
16.7% C
0.0% D
5.6% F

18 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 18 enrolled.

Brandon James Grenier 18 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.23GPA
61.1% A
22.2% B
11.1% C
0.0% D
5.6% F

18 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 18 enrolled.

Andoni Perez-Lopez 19 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.22GPA
36.8% A
52.6% B
10.5% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

19 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 19 enrolled.

Brittany Frodge 18 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.19GPA
44.4% A
38.9% B
16.7% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

18 letter grades · Limited sample

5.3% withdrew · 1 of 19 enrolled.

Elisabetta Rodio 17 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.12GPA
23.5% A
64.7% B
11.8% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

17 letter grades · Limited sample

5.6% withdrew · 1 of 18 enrolled.

Sandra Caldere Mejias 17 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.01GPA
41.2% A
41.2% B
11.8% C
0.0% D
5.9% F

17 letter grades · Limited sample

10.5% withdrew · 2 of 19 enrolled.

Raquel E Decker 17 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.97GPA
41.2% A
35.3% B
17.6% C
0.0% D
5.9% F

17 letter grades · Limited sample

5.6% withdrew · 1 of 18 enrolled.

Lauren Hoos 18 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.94GPA
33.3% A
33.3% B
27.8% C
5.6% D
0.0% F

18 letter grades · Limited sample

5.3% withdrew · 1 of 19 enrolled.

Derrek Robert Powell 17 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.78GPA
35.3% A
23.5% B
29.4% C
5.9% D
5.9% F

17 letter grades · Limited sample

10.5% withdrew · 2 of 19 enrolled.

Pedro Sebastian Cuevas Collante 19 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.46GPA
21.1% A
36.8% B
15.8% C
10.5% D
15.8% F

19 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 19 enrolled.

Karen Gaston Malcolm 138 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

138 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.51
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.89
Connection4.62
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.42
Reflection4.75
Respect4.84
Creativity4.64
Feedback4.66
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.86
Questions4.79
Daniel Amarelo 19 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.92
Technology4.42
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.05
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.48
Inclusivity3.62
Grading3.69
Reflection4.22
Respect4.85
Creativity4.60
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.65
Questions4.49
Adriana Cabeza 31 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

31 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.32
Synthesis4.61
Collaboration4.92
Connection3.96
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity4.49
Grading4.27
Reflection4.74
Respect4.59
Creativity4.59
Feedback4.46
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.61
Questions4.61
Ula Adamska 31 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

31 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.87
Technology3.83
Synthesis3.99
Collaboration4.57
Connection3.65
Contribution4.06
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.45
Reflection4.32
Respect4.62
Creativity4.52
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.34
Questions4.72
Daniel Berjano Rodrã­Guez 14 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.50
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.30
Reflection4.70
Respect4.60
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.30
Questions4.40
Jose Luis Toledano 20 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.99
Technology4.99
Synthesis4.99
Collaboration4.99
Connection4.98
Contribution4.99
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.99
Grading4.99
Reflection4.99
Respect4.99
Creativity4.99
Feedback4.98
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Kiki Canales-Gutierrez 21 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.49
Contribution4.82
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.88
Reflection4.82
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.88
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.82
Questions4.92
Esther Lynn Brown 6 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.70
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.40
Grading5.00
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Brandy Valdez 25 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

25 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.48
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.50
Contribution4.36
Discussion4.41
Inclusivity4.47
Grading4.29
Reflection4.41
Respect4.57
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.53
Questions4.39
Ana Llanos 11 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.86
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.93
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.95
Contribution4.91
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.93
Grading4.91
Reflection4.91
Respect4.98
Creativity4.91
Feedback4.91
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.95
Questions4.93
Maria Vazquez 11 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.58
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.69
Grading4.69
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.69
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.95
Questions5.00
Miguel <C1>Ngel Bartolome 16 reported responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.90
Contribution4.85
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.98
Grading4.82
Reflection4.85
Respect4.92
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.98
Questions4.85
Griffin Carty 11 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.81
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.82
Reflection4.92
Respect4.95
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.42
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Sophia Valdez 10 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.62
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.62
Connection4.62
Contribution4.62
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.85
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.21
Interaction4.62
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Norberto Cardenales Cardona 24 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.80
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.80
Reflection4.70
Respect4.95
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.85
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.85
Questions4.95
Miriam E Himes 12 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.85
Contribution4.95
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.85
Reflection4.85
Respect5.00
Creativity4.95
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.75
Questions4.95
Kaylyn Blair 34 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5

34 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.65
Reflection4.75
Respect4.95
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.85
Questions5.00
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.