Course record SOCY
SOCY 4052
Social Inequalities in Health
University of Colorado Boulder
411 grades17 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score35/100
Below average
Corey Mczeal 184 grades · 1 term 3.48GPA
184 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mczeal vs. the course average
A
+9.1
B
−2.6
C
−4.2
D
−1.0
F
−1.2
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 184 enrolled.
Overall4.34 / 5
74 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology4.05
Synthesis4.49
Collaboration4.04
Connection4.81
Contribution4.34
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.52
Grading4.06
Reflection4.81
Respect4.52
Creativity4.94
Feedback4.09
Interaction4.71
Challenge4.93
Questions4.49
Adenife T Modile 67 grades · 1 term 3.25GPA
67 letter grades
Compare with the course
Modile vs. the course average
A
same
B
−2.6
C
−0.3
D
+1.8
F
+1.1
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 67 enrolled.
Ryan Kelly Masters 91 grades · 1 term 3.13GPA
91 letter grades
Compare with the course
Masters vs. the course average
A
−16.0
B
+8.6
C
+10.2
D
+0.6
F
−3.4
Difference in percentage points.
4.2% withdrew · 4 of 95 enrolled.
Overall3.98 / 5
57 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.49
Technology4.39
Synthesis4.09
Collaboration3.48
Connection4.71
Contribution3.99
Discussion4.18
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.18
Reflection4.19
Respect4.80
Creativity3.79
Feedback3.96
Interaction4.29
Challenge4.40
Questions4.29
Jake Carias 69 grades · 1 term 3.03GPA
69 letter grades
Compare with the course
Carias vs. the course average
A
−3.1
B
−1.9
C
−2.0
D
+0.2
F
+6.7
Difference in percentage points.
2.8% withdrew · 2 of 71 enrolled.
Overall4.46 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.80
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.30
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
Tracy Michelle Kirkland 23 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.51
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration3.83
Connection4.73
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.76
Reflection4.76
Respect4.71
Creativity4.32
Feedback4.76
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.68
Questions4.76
Jason Downing 22 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration4.12
Connection4.72
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity4.19
Grading3.74
Reflection4.37
Respect4.62
Creativity4.17
Feedback3.82
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.17
Questions3.78
Aubrey Limburg 30 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.70
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.50
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Jessica Austin 11 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.81
Connection4.81
Contribution4.81
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.69
Reflection4.69
Respect5.00
Creativity4.69
Feedback4.69
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.69
Questions5.00
Justin Vinneau Palarino 26 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.81
Technology4.81
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.07
Connection4.87
Contribution4.76
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.13
Reflection4.64
Respect4.83
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.11
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.87
Questions4.71
Theresa Edwards-Capen 12 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.91
Technology4.91
Synthesis4.91
Collaboration4.48
Connection4.91
Contribution4.82
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.91
Reflection4.91
Respect5.00
Creativity4.91
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.91
Questions5.00
Daniel Hunter Simon 32 reported responses 3.75Eval / 5
Overall3.75 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration2.80
Connection4.90
Contribution3.50
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity4.90
Grading3.60
Reflection3.90
Respect4.80
Creativity3.30
Feedback2.90
Interaction3.80
Challenge4.00
Questions4.20
Austin Fitzgerald 63 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5
63 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.04
Collaboration3.41
Connection4.72
Contribution3.92
Discussion4.42
Inclusivity4.82
Grading4.08
Reflection4.28
Respect4.78
Creativity4.01
Feedback3.82
Interaction4.28
Challenge4.07
Questions4.48
Grace M Nakajima 29 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.40
Connection4.70
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.30
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.20
Questions4.70
Payal Jayant Hathi 66 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
66 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.90
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.20
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Lucy Merrill 66 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
66 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.90
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.20
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Melike Tozlu 1 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology3.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions4.00
Mady Kienstra 3 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.70
Respect4.70
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.30
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.