Course record SOCY
SOCY 4014
Criminology
University of Colorado Boulder
655 grades14 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score28/100
Below average
Kyle Thomas 288 grades · 1 term 3.39GPA
288 letter grades
Compare with the course
Thomas vs. the course average
A
+14.7
B
−6.9
C
−4.9
D
−1.1
F
−1.7
Difference in percentage points.
3.0% withdrew · 9 of 297 enrolled.
Overall4.43 / 5
192 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration3.45
Connection4.68
Contribution4.12
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.52
Grading4.45
Reflection4.55
Respect4.70
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.48
Challenge4.60
Questions4.65
Jillian Juliet Turanovic 74 grades · 1 term 3.12GPA
74 letter grades
Compare with the course
Turanovic vs. the course average
A
−8.8
B
+12.1
C
+1.0
D
−1.9
F
−2.4
Difference in percentage points.
1.3% withdrew · 1 of 75 enrolled.
Overall4.56 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.90
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.50
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.90
Questions4.70
Michael L Radelet 114 grades · 1 term 2.87GPA
114 letter grades
Compare with the course
Radelet vs. the course average
A
−6.1
B
−4.1
C
+4.5
D
+3.8
F
+1.9
Difference in percentage points.
4.2% withdrew · 5 of 119 enrolled.
Overall3.95 / 5
61 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology3.75
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration2.80
Connection4.55
Contribution3.55
Discussion3.75
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.10
Reflection4.15
Respect4.35
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.80
Interaction3.95
Challenge4.00
Questions4.25
David C Pyrooz 179 grades · 1 term 2.82GPA
179 letter grades
Compare with the course
Pyrooz vs. the course average
A
−16.1
B
+8.8
C
+4.5
D
+0.1
F
+2.6
Difference in percentage points.
2.2% withdrew · 4 of 183 enrolled.
Overall3.74 / 5
152 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.05
Synthesis3.92
Collaboration2.28
Connection4.43
Contribution3.53
Discussion3.93
Inclusivity4.34
Grading3.50
Reflection3.85
Respect4.43
Creativity3.62
Feedback2.87
Interaction3.83
Challenge4.11
Questions3.55
Ashley Myrtle Blinkhorn 36 reported responses 3.63Eval / 5
Overall3.63 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology3.60
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration2.90
Connection4.30
Contribution3.50
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.60
Reflection3.80
Respect3.90
Creativity3.30
Feedback3.50
Interaction3.80
Challenge3.60
Questions4.00
Stephen Wilson 20 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.42
Technology4.37
Synthesis4.41
Collaboration4.13
Connection4.58
Contribution4.38
Discussion4.38
Inclusivity4.74
Grading4.41
Reflection4.42
Respect4.72
Creativity4.31
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.40
Questions4.49
Erica Paige Jackson 91 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
91 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.17
Connection4.73
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.83
Reflection4.67
Respect4.87
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.57
Questions4.80
Jennifer Jewel Tostlebe 78 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
78 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration3.97
Connection4.70
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.50
Reflection4.77
Respect4.90
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.63
Questions4.77
Selena Munoz-Jones 30 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.47
Connection4.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.87
Grading4.57
Reflection4.83
Respect4.93
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.77
Questions4.77
Stephanie Ossovski Richter 120 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
120 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.32
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration3.51
Connection4.58
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.39
Inclusivity4.58
Grading4.08
Reflection4.29
Respect4.54
Creativity4.12
Feedback4.03
Interaction4.26
Challenge4.28
Questions4.36
Jose Sanchez 9 reported responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration3.62
Connection4.35
Contribution4.69
Discussion4.27
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.00
Reflection4.69
Respect4.69
Creativity3.85
Feedback3.04
Interaction4.39
Challenge4.42
Questions4.69
Andrew S Gutierrez 28 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.90
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.70
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Amanda Ljuba 50 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
50 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.83
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.89
Contribution4.56
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.88
Grading4.57
Reflection4.75
Respect4.86
Creativity4.56
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.53
Questions4.82
Tara Streng Schroeter 55 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
55 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.90
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.