Course record SOCY
SOCY 2044
Crime and Society
University of Colorado Boulder
1,026 grades19 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score25/100
Below average
Corey Mczeal 94 grades · 1 term 3.58GPA
94 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mczeal vs. the course average
A
+32.5
B
−20.5
C
−6.9
D
−1.5
F
−3.6
Difference in percentage points.
1.1% withdrew · 1 of 95 enrolled.
Overall4.50 / 5
108 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration3.82
Connection4.90
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.66
Inclusivity4.84
Grading4.76
Reflection4.88
Respect4.86
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.18
Interaction4.34
Challenge4.81
Questions4.63
Laurent Cilia 77 grades · 1 term 3.37GPA
77 letter grades
Compare with the course
Cilia vs. the course average
A
+16.0
B
−5.1
C
−5.0
D
−2.3
F
−3.6
Difference in percentage points.
3.8% withdrew · 3 of 80 enrolled.
Overall4.23 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.60
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.20
Reflection4.30
Respect4.50
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.20
Questions4.30
Alaina Iacobucci 186 grades · 1 term 3.19GPA
186 letter grades
Compare with the course
Iacobucci vs. the course average
A
+5.3
B
+0.1
C
−3.6
D
−0.9
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
4.1% withdrew · 8 of 194 enrolled.
Overall4.79 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.88
Collaboration4.68
Connection4.98
Contribution4.84
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.98
Grading4.95
Reflection4.95
Respect4.98
Creativity4.95
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.95
Questions4.95
David C Pyrooz 570 grades · 1 term 3.01GPA
570 letter grades
Compare with the course
Pyrooz vs. the course average
A
−3.2
B
+4.6
C
−0.1
D
−0.3
F
−1.0
Difference in percentage points.
1.9% withdrew · 11 of 581 enrolled.
Overall4.12 / 5
198 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.51
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.55
Connection4.90
Contribution4.07
Discussion4.29
Inclusivity4.88
Grading4.35
Reflection4.32
Respect4.79
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.21
Challenge4.30
Questions4.40
Michael D Sousa 99 grades · 1 term 1.96GPA
99 letter grades
Compare with the course
Sousa vs. the course average
A
−34.8
B
−3.2
C
+17.9
D
+6.5
F
+13.6
Difference in percentage points.
10.0% withdrew · 11 of 110 enrolled.
Overall3.90 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology3.70
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.40
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.10
Reflection4.10
Respect4.20
Creativity3.30
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.30
Questions4.00
Ashley Myrtle Blinkhorn 38 reported responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.13
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.63
Connection4.47
Contribution4.13
Discussion4.43
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.00
Reflection4.50
Respect4.53
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.63
Interaction4.33
Challenge4.03
Questions4.03
Selena Munoz-Jones 100 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
100 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.76
Technology4.71
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.87
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.81
Grading4.65
Reflection4.79
Respect4.82
Creativity4.61
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.62
Questions4.86
Asa Christopher Iacobucci 92 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5
92 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.22
Collaboration3.82
Connection4.92
Contribution4.01
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.78
Grading4.76
Reflection4.76
Respect4.62
Creativity4.23
Feedback4.39
Interaction4.32
Challenge4.45
Questions4.84
Jasmine Suryawan Buenviaje 29 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.60
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.10
Reflection4.30
Respect4.30
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.00
Questions3.90
Jose Sanchez 21 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.84
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration3.97
Connection4.95
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.98
Grading4.42
Reflection4.76
Respect4.95
Creativity4.71
Feedback4.32
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.71
Questions4.53
Jenn Tostlebe 9 reported responses 3.90Eval / 5
Overall3.90 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.20
Connection4.10
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.10
Reflection4.20
Respect3.80
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.20
Challenge3.80
Questions4.00
Elizabeth Weltman 28 reported responses 4.03Eval / 5
Overall4.03 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.03
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.63
Contribution3.67
Discussion4.47
Inclusivity4.47
Grading4.03
Reflection4.33
Respect4.43
Creativity4.27
Feedback3.57
Interaction4.37
Challenge3.73
Questions4.60
Andrew S Gutierrez 168 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
168 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.56
Technology4.36
Synthesis4.41
Collaboration3.69
Connection4.80
Contribution4.08
Discussion4.41
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.45
Reflection4.37
Respect4.76
Creativity4.27
Feedback3.94
Interaction4.27
Challenge4.37
Questions4.44
Alena Gabrielson 24 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.43
Connection4.73
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.37
Reflection4.60
Respect4.77
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.27
Questions4.43
Hannah Lyden 29 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.30
Connection4.80
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.10
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.30
Questions4.10
Joy Dertinger 128 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
128 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.70
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.20
Reflection4.10
Respect4.70
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.30
Questions4.40
Glenda D Walden 128 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5
128 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.70
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.20
Reflection4.10
Respect4.70
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.40
Questions4.50
Valentina Serrano Salomon 20 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.90
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.60
Reflection5.00
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.80
Questions4.60
Tara Streng Schroeter 10 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.90
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.