Course record SOCY
SOCY 2034
Drugs in United States Society
University of Colorado Boulder
333 grades13 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score33/100
Below average
Glenda D Walden 278 grades · 1 term 3.06GPA
278 letter grades
Compare with the course
Walden vs. the course average
A
+1.7
B
−0.7
C
−0.6
D
−0.5
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
3.8% withdrew · 11 of 289 enrolled.
Overall4.58 / 5
357 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.81
Collaboration4.59
Connection4.91
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.91
Grading4.84
Reflection4.83
Respect4.93
Creativity4.83
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.88
Questions4.89
Earle Jay Watterworth 55 grades · 1 term 2.85GPA
55 letter grades
Compare with the course
Watterworth vs. the course average
A
−8.5
B
+3.7
C
+3.2
D
+2.8
F
−1.2
Difference in percentage points.
1.8% withdrew · 1 of 56 enrolled.
Overall3.67 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.82
Technology2.73
Synthesis3.59
Collaboration2.72
Connection4.56
Contribution4.14
Discussion4.14
Inclusivity4.44
Grading2.42
Reflection3.70
Respect4.27
Creativity3.42
Feedback2.97
Interaction3.85
Challenge3.88
Questions3.55
Luke Michael Novack 60 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
60 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.27
Connection4.67
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.70
Reflection4.60
Respect4.73
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.37
Questions4.80
Marley Olson 75 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5
75 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.19
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.83
Connection4.53
Contribution4.44
Discussion4.36
Inclusivity4.56
Grading4.18
Reflection4.23
Respect4.57
Creativity4.35
Feedback3.82
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.33
Questions4.15
Jason Downing 25 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration3.98
Connection4.33
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.05
Reflection4.27
Respect4.30
Creativity4.21
Feedback3.94
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.20
Questions3.84
Sophia Harris 119 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5
119 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.60
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.10
Reflection4.20
Respect4.50
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.20
Questions4.20
Annabel Fay 102 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
102 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.70
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.30
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.50
Lucy Merrill 70 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
70 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.60
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.30
Respect4.60
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.30
Questions4.40
Sydney Nemetz 68 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
68 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.60
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.30
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.40
Questions4.40
Megan Swanson 67 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
67 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.60
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.50
Reflection4.30
Respect4.60
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.30
Questions4.60
Tara Streng Schroeter 41 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.90
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
Amanda Ljuba 19 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.83
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.77
Reflection4.73
Respect5.00
Creativity4.83
Feedback4.73
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.83
Questions4.93
Andrew S Gutierrez 17 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.27
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.67
Connection4.53
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.83
Grading4.70
Reflection4.50
Respect4.77
Creativity4.37
Feedback4.13
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.43
Questions4.63
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.