Course record SOCY
SOCY 1021
United States Race and Ethnic Relations I
University of Colorado Boulder
1,295 grades21 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score27/100
Below average
Meghan Katherine Mordy 94 grades · 1 term 3.73GPA
94 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mordy vs. the course average
A
+33.4
B
−12.7
C
−13.2
D
−5.3
F
−2.2
Difference in percentage points.
2.1% withdrew · 2 of 96 enrolled.
Overall4.72 / 5
59 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Liam C Downey 85 grades · 1 term 3.41GPA
85 letter grades
Compare with the course
Downey vs. the course average
A
+21.6
B
−14.0
C
−3.7
D
−4.2
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
7.6% withdrew · 7 of 92 enrolled.
Glenda D Walden 355 grades · 1 term 3.27GPA
355 letter grades
Compare with the course
Walden vs. the course average
A
+3.4
B
+4.6
C
−4.7
D
−1.7
F
−1.6
Difference in percentage points.
4.6% withdrew · 17 of 372 enrolled.
Overall4.38 / 5
377 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.31
Synthesis4.34
Collaboration3.93
Connection4.68
Contribution4.01
Discussion4.39
Inclusivity4.72
Grading4.20
Reflection4.36
Respect4.75
Creativity4.12
Feedback3.89
Interaction4.54
Challenge4.40
Questions4.49
Corey Mczeal 195 grades · 1 term 3.27GPA
195 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mczeal vs. the course average
A
+11.1
B
−5.8
C
−2.5
D
−2.8
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
0.5% withdrew · 1 of 196 enrolled.
Overall4.39 / 5
139 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.52
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration3.63
Connection4.91
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.86
Grading4.67
Reflection4.71
Respect4.85
Creativity4.64
Feedback4.16
Interaction4.37
Challenge4.67
Questions4.33
Christina Alicia Sue 566 grades · 1 term 2.77GPA
566 letter grades
Compare with the course
Sue vs. the course average
A
−14.7
B
+3.3
C
+6.6
D
+3.5
F
+1.4
Difference in percentage points.
3.2% withdrew · 19 of 585 enrolled.
Overall4.26 / 5
226 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.09
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration3.39
Connection4.88
Contribution4.02
Discussion4.28
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.22
Reflection4.52
Respect4.72
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.47
Challenge4.45
Questions4.50
David Cook-Martin 6 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.00
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity3.50
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Emily Niles 115 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
115 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.47
Connection4.82
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.84
Grading4.59
Reflection4.84
Respect4.91
Creativity4.36
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.67
Questions4.75
Eduardo Lievanos Medina 86 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5
86 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.22
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration3.97
Connection4.59
Contribution4.34
Discussion4.51
Inclusivity4.71
Grading4.11
Reflection4.51
Respect4.77
Creativity3.69
Feedback3.68
Interaction4.49
Challenge4.23
Questions4.42
Laurent Cilia 18 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.23
Synthesis4.99
Collaboration4.22
Connection5.00
Contribution4.99
Discussion4.99
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.23
Reflection4.99
Respect4.23
Creativity4.23
Feedback3.46
Interaction4.23
Challenge4.23
Questions4.23
Grace M Nakajima 53 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
53 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.93
Contribution4.87
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.87
Grading4.70
Reflection4.83
Respect4.87
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.63
Questions4.83
Jasmine Suryawan Buenviaje 7 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.40
Reflection5.00
Respect4.70
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Matthew Sean Bravo 50 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
50 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology4.19
Synthesis4.21
Collaboration4.59
Connection4.71
Contribution3.91
Discussion4.21
Inclusivity4.81
Grading4.18
Reflection4.32
Respect4.61
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.10
Questions4.42
Bertha Alicia Bermudez Tapia 6 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.80
Grading3.70
Reflection4.70
Respect4.50
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Nicole Aggarwal 34 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.73
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.57
Reflection4.63
Respect4.70
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.43
Challenge4.60
Questions4.63
Katie Mercer 9 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.99
Technology4.99
Synthesis4.97
Collaboration4.56
Connection5.00
Contribution4.86
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.58
Reflection4.75
Respect4.95
Creativity4.94
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.97
Questions4.77
Luke Michael Novack 20 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.00
Connection4.80
Contribution3.60
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.10
Reflection4.60
Respect4.20
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.20
Questions4.20
Noor Toor 152 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
152 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.66
Technology4.52
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.74
Connection4.88
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.82
Grading4.51
Reflection4.65
Respect4.68
Creativity4.33
Feedback4.17
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.48
Questions4.38
Suleyman Kiroglu 40 reported responses 3.82Eval / 5
Overall3.82 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.53
Synthesis3.93
Collaboration3.57
Connection4.40
Contribution3.83
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.63
Grading3.63
Reflection4.07
Respect4.63
Creativity3.33
Feedback3.10
Interaction4.13
Challenge3.73
Questions3.70
Jason Downing 3 reported responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion3.30
Inclusivity4.70
Grading3.30
Reflection4.70
Respect3.70
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.70
Questions3.00
Rika Ruiz 137 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
137 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.18
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration3.76
Connection4.65
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.22
Inclusivity4.68
Grading4.16
Reflection4.28
Respect4.70
Creativity4.08
Feedback4.01
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.30
Questions4.43
Mady Kienstra 20 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration3.30
Connection5.00
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.60
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.40
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.