Course record SOCY

SOCY 1016

Sex, Gender, and Society 1

University of Colorado Boulder

1,332 grades26 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score47/100
Mixed record

Professors 26 of 26

Amanda Jean Stevenson 102 grades · 1 term 3.83GPA
89.2% A
8.8% B
2.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

102 letter grades

Compare with the course
Stevenson vs. the course average
A +29.9
B −21.1
C −5.9
D −1.5
F −1.4

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 102 enrolled.

Amanda Stewart 708 grades · 1 term 3.51GPA
65.7% A
27.1% B
5.2% C
0.6% D
1.4% F

708 letter grades

Compare with the course
Stewart vs. the course average
A +6.4
B −2.8
C −2.7
D −0.9
F same

Difference in percentage points.

1.5% withdrew · 11 of 719 enrolled.

Jasmine Suryawan 65 grades · 1 term 3.32GPA
55.4% A
32.3% B
6.2% C
3.1% D
3.1% F

65 letter grades

Compare with the course
Suryawan vs. the course average
A −3.9
B +2.4
C −1.7
D +1.6
F +1.7

Difference in percentage points.

3.0% withdrew · 2 of 67 enrolled.

Matthew Spencer Rowe 94 grades · 1 term 3.26GPA
50.0% A
34.0% B
10.6% C
3.2% D
2.1% F

94 letter grades

Compare with the course
Rowe vs. the course average
A −9.3
B +4.2
C +2.8
D +1.7
F +0.7

Difference in percentage points.

1.1% withdrew · 1 of 95 enrolled.

Ian Whalen 126 grades · 1 term 3.26GPA
46.8% A
42.9% B
7.9% C
1.6% D
0.8% F

126 letter grades

Compare with the course
Whalen vs. the course average
A −12.5
B +13.0
C +0.1
D +0.1
F −0.6

Difference in percentage points.

0.8% withdrew · 1 of 127 enrolled.

Molly Todd 32 grades · 1 term 3.09GPA
46.9% A
31.3% B
12.5% C
3.1% D
6.3% F

32 letter grades

Compare with the course
Todd vs. the course average
A −12.4
B +1.4
C +4.6
D +1.6
F +4.8

Difference in percentage points.

3.0% withdrew · 1 of 33 enrolled.

Hillary Rachel Steinberg 131 grades · 1 term 3.05GPA
37.4% A
38.9% B
19.8% C
3.1% D
0.8% F

131 letter grades

Compare with the course
Steinberg vs. the course average
A −21.9
B +9.1
C +12.0
D +1.6
F −0.7

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 131 enrolled.

Katherine Mercer 58 grades · 1 term 2.97GPA
32.8% A
43.1% B
15.5% C
6.9% D
1.7% F

58 letter grades

Compare with the course
Mercer vs. the course average
A −26.6
B +13.2
C +7.6
D +5.4
F +0.3

Difference in percentage points.

6.5% withdrew · 4 of 62 enrolled.

Alison Hatch 16 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.30GPA
56.3% A
25.0% B
18.8% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

16 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 16 enrolled.

Grace M Nakajima 47 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5

47 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.10
Connection4.80
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.50
Reflection4.40
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.50
Questions4.30
Kim-Phuong Truong-Vu 22 reported responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.13
Collaboration3.52
Connection4.71
Contribution4.39
Discussion4.11
Inclusivity4.68
Grading4.05
Reflection4.47
Respect4.78
Creativity4.18
Feedback3.52
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.38
Questions4.14
Nicole Aggarwal 28 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

28 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.90
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Tara Kay Streng Schroeter 28 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5

28 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration4.53
Connection4.90
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.93
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.67
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.80
Questions4.93
Laurent Cilia 19 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.01
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.16
Connection4.71
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.16
Inclusivity4.87
Grading3.61
Reflection4.35
Respect4.92
Creativity4.08
Feedback3.71
Interaction4.66
Challenge4.32
Questions3.94
Jasmine Suryawan Buenviaje 61 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

61 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.89
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.38
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.18
Reflection4.86
Respect4.72
Creativity4.86
Feedback4.11
Interaction4.46
Challenge4.74
Questions4.36
Zoe Lefkowitz 130 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

130 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.18
Collaboration3.98
Connection4.78
Contribution3.97
Discussion4.17
Inclusivity4.78
Grading4.11
Reflection4.27
Respect4.65
Creativity4.27
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.10
Questions4.53
Hannah L Edwards 11 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.90
Contribution4.27
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.83
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.77
Questions4.43
Sherri Lynn Sasnett-Martichuski 15 reported responses 3.57Eval / 5
Overall3.57 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.44
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.34
Collaboration2.37
Connection4.28
Contribution3.41
Discussion3.34
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.24
Reflection3.70
Respect4.53
Creativity3.37
Feedback3.57
Interaction3.46
Challenge3.60
Questions4.02
Selena Munoz-Jones 4 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Katie Mercer 38 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

38 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.70
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.80
Grading3.80
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.40
Questions4.60
Theresa Edwards-Capen 40 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

40 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.48
Connection4.80
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.81
Grading4.25
Reflection4.50
Respect4.83
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.01
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.45
Questions4.70
Corey Mczeal 61 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

61 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.61
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration3.74
Connection4.79
Contribution4.21
Discussion4.36
Inclusivity4.82
Grading4.62
Reflection4.64
Respect4.61
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.09
Interaction4.39
Challenge4.61
Questions4.34
Kelsi Faley 18 reported responses 4.02Eval / 5
Overall4.02 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.27
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.03
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.20
Contribution4.17
Discussion4.03
Inclusivity4.27
Grading4.10
Reflection4.10
Respect4.10
Creativity3.50
Feedback3.83
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.07
Questions4.17
Ellie Simmons 53 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

53 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.82
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration4.43
Connection4.85
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.93
Grading4.90
Reflection4.75
Respect4.88
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.55
Questions4.97
Tara Streng Schroeter 20 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.40
Reflection4.40
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Sydney Nemetz 21 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.80
Contribution4.30
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.40
Reflection4.70
Respect4.20
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.10
Questions4.30
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.