Course record SOCY

SOCY 1006

The Social Construction of Sexuality

University of Colorado Boulder

1,521 grades22 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score47/100
Mixed record

Professors 22 of 22

Amanda Stewart 954 grades · 1 term 3.53GPA
68.1% A
24.6% B
5.3% C
0.9% D
0.9% F

954 letter grades

Compare with the course
Stewart vs. the course average
A +5.9
B −2.1
C −1.7
D −1.2
F −0.9

Difference in percentage points.

1.8% withdrew · 17 of 971 enrolled.

Matthew Spencer Rowe 91 grades · 1 term 3.29GPA
58.2% A
26.4% B
8.8% C
1.1% D
5.5% F

91 letter grades

Compare with the course
Rowe vs. the course average
A −4.0
B −0.4
C +1.8
D −1.1
F +3.7

Difference in percentage points.

3.2% withdrew · 3 of 94 enrolled.

Marshall David Smith 55 grades · 1 term 3.29GPA
61.8% A
21.8% B
7.3% C
5.5% D
3.6% F

55 letter grades

Compare with the course
Smith vs. the course average
A −0.4
B −4.9
C +0.2
D +3.3
F +1.8

Difference in percentage points.

6.8% withdrew · 4 of 59 enrolled.

Glenda D Walden 294 grades · 1 term 3.17GPA
47.6% A
33.3% B
11.9% C
5.4% D
1.7% F

294 letter grades

Compare with the course
Walden vs. the course average
A −14.6
B +6.6
C +4.9
D +3.3
F −0.1

Difference in percentage points.

3.9% withdrew · 12 of 306 enrolled.

Jasmine Suryawan 127 grades · 1 term 3.17GPA
54.3% A
29.9% B
7.1% C
3.1% D
5.5% F

127 letter grades

Compare with the course
Suryawan vs. the course average
A −7.9
B +3.2
C +0.1
D +1.0
F +3.7

Difference in percentage points.

3.1% withdrew · 4 of 131 enrolled.

Jasmine Suryawan Buenviaje 69 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

69 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.88
Technology4.86
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.14
Connection4.92
Contribution4.98
Discussion4.66
Inclusivity4.99
Grading4.83
Reflection4.92
Respect5.00
Creativity4.76
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.90
Questions4.85
Heather Champeau 55 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5

55 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology4.27
Synthesis4.17
Collaboration4.27
Connection4.43
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.13
Reflection4.40
Respect4.63
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.93
Interaction4.57
Challenge4.33
Questions4.20
Katherine Mercer 61 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5

61 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.31
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration4.48
Connection4.78
Contribution4.71
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity4.95
Grading4.74
Reflection4.74
Respect4.95
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.39
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.53
Questions4.79
Alison Hatch 125 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

125 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.84
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration4.12
Connection4.91
Contribution4.76
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.92
Grading4.42
Reflection4.72
Respect4.94
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.42
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.70
Questions4.87
Zoe Lefkowitz 54 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

54 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.52
Synthesis4.49
Collaboration4.69
Connection4.79
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.42
Inclusivity4.71
Grading4.70
Reflection4.69
Respect4.62
Creativity4.39
Feedback4.21
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.21
Questions4.80
Nicole Aggarwal 67 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

67 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.59
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.06
Connection4.79
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.95
Grading4.61
Reflection4.67
Respect4.94
Creativity4.03
Feedback4.24
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.52
Questions4.67
Eduardo Lievanos Medina 15 reported responses 4.03Eval / 5
Overall4.03 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.03
Technology3.97
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.43
Contribution3.87
Discussion4.03
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.00
Reflection4.37
Respect4.83
Creativity3.57
Feedback3.53
Interaction4.33
Challenge3.90
Questions4.10
Marley Olson 25 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

25 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.87
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.43
Connection4.83
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.53
Reflection4.83
Respect4.77
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.53
Questions4.70
Melissa Villarreal 36 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

36 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.52
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration3.65
Connection4.68
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.88
Grading4.68
Reflection4.52
Respect4.90
Creativity4.35
Feedback3.83
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.60
Questions4.62
Selena Munoz-Jones 31 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

31 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.53
Connection4.83
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.87
Reflection4.63
Respect4.93
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.67
Questions4.80
Ileana Morales 24 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.60
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.83
Grading4.53
Reflection4.63
Respect4.90
Creativity3.97
Feedback4.27
Interaction4.47
Challenge4.40
Questions4.67
Kelsi Faley 48 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

48 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.61
Collaboration4.38
Connection4.92
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.93
Grading4.80
Reflection4.65
Respect4.84
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.71
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.56
Questions4.79
Sam Massey 58 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

58 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.44
Technology4.44
Synthesis4.36
Collaboration4.29
Connection4.71
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.44
Reflection4.51
Respect4.84
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.44
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.46
Questions4.54
Ellie Simmons 27 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

27 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.33
Connection4.77
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.97
Grading4.60
Reflection4.57
Respect4.80
Creativity4.17
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.13
Questions4.67
Mady Kienstra 8 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.80
Challenge5.00
Questions4.50
Theresa Edwards-Capen 19 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.63
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.73
Reflection4.60
Respect4.70
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.83
Questions4.77
Andrew S Gutierrez 1 reported responses 2.67Eval / 5
Overall2.67 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis2.00
Collaboration1.00
Connection2.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion3.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.00
Reflection3.00
Respect4.00
Creativity3.00
Feedback1.00
Challenge3.00
Questions2.00
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.