Course record SOCY
SOCY 1004
Deviance in U.S. Society
University of Colorado Boulder
2,656 grades38 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score20/100
Below average
Jon Samuel Gordon 92 grades · 1 term 3.37GPA
92 letter grades
Compare with the course
Gordon vs. the course average
A
+29.9
B
−13.4
C
−13.4
D
−0.3
F
−2.8
Difference in percentage points.
1.1% withdrew · 1 of 93 enrolled.
Overall4.58 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.90
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Earle Jay Watterworth 87 grades · 1 term 3.10GPA
87 letter grades
Compare with the course
Watterworth vs. the course average
A
+3.6
B
+3.0
C
−1.6
D
−0.1
F
−4.9
Difference in percentage points.
3.3% withdrew · 3 of 90 enrolled.
Overall4.16 / 5
45 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology3.00
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration3.15
Connection4.79
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.57
Grading3.77
Reflection4.44
Respect4.73
Creativity3.74
Feedback3.62
Interaction4.71
Challenge4.52
Questions4.50
Glenda D Walden 1,729 grades · 1 term 2.90GPA
1,729 letter grades
Compare with the course
Walden vs. the course average
A
−0.8
B
+0.8
C
+0.4
D
−0.4
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
4.1% withdrew · 73 of 1,802 enrolled.
Overall4.24 / 5
1,041 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.42
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.31
Collaboration3.74
Connection4.72
Contribution3.75
Discussion4.43
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.38
Reflection4.30
Respect4.62
Creativity4.25
Feedback3.96
Interaction4.23
Challenge4.49
Questions4.59
Marshall David Smith 40 grades · 1 term 2.83GPA
40 letter grades
Compare with the course
Smith vs. the course average
A
+14.3
B
−12.0
C
−12.7
D
+0.3
F
+10.1
Difference in percentage points.
2.4% withdrew · 1 of 41 enrolled.
Overall4.36 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.36
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.06
Connection4.90
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.90
Grading3.90
Reflection4.55
Respect4.63
Creativity4.39
Feedback3.73
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.36
Questions4.52
Thomas Pearson Wadsworth 708 grades · 1 term 2.81GPA
708 letter grades
Compare with the course
Wadsworth vs. the course average
A
−3.2
B
+0.2
C
+1.6
D
+1.0
F
+0.4
Difference in percentage points.
3.8% withdrew · 28 of 736 enrolled.
Overall4.07 / 5
458 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology3.97
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration2.95
Connection4.49
Contribution3.93
Discussion4.22
Inclusivity4.42
Grading3.88
Reflection4.18
Respect4.32
Creativity4.00
Feedback2.99
Interaction3.86
Challenge4.07
Questions4.08
Salvatore Lapuma 41 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.63
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.47
Reflection4.63
Respect4.67
Creativity4.03
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.33
Questions4.73
Mary T Edwards-Capen 47 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
47 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.80
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.80
Reflection4.63
Respect4.97
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.67
Questions4.87
Sydney Lauren Arens 50 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
50 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.13
Connection4.60
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.20
Reflection4.57
Respect4.83
Creativity4.27
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.47
Questions4.47
Selena Munoz-Jones 85 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
85 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration4.43
Connection4.80
Contribution4.44
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity4.84
Grading4.56
Reflection4.57
Respect4.77
Creativity4.04
Feedback4.36
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.47
Questions4.72
Marley Olson 34 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.13
Collaboration3.95
Connection4.31
Contribution4.12
Discussion4.03
Inclusivity4.64
Grading4.64
Reflection4.20
Respect4.34
Creativity4.18
Feedback3.99
Interaction4.14
Challenge4.10
Questions4.70
Jeanne Kaufman 4 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration2.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions3.01
Katherine Mercer 82 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
82 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.68
Connection4.86
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.61
Reflection4.76
Respect4.93
Creativity4.56
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.68
Questions4.79
Laurent Cilia 13 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.16
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration3.94
Connection4.70
Contribution4.32
Discussion4.16
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.01
Reflection4.70
Respect4.36
Creativity4.39
Feedback4.16
Interaction4.16
Challenge4.55
Questions3.39
Erica Paige Jackson 55 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
55 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.73
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.70
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.27
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.60
Questions4.73
Luke Michael Novack 47 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5
47 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.97
Technology4.30
Synthesis3.77
Collaboration3.57
Connection4.30
Contribution4.07
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.17
Respect4.57
Creativity3.63
Feedback4.07
Interaction4.53
Challenge3.83
Questions4.50
Grace M Nakajima 149 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
149 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.59
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.80
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.50
Reflection4.59
Respect4.60
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.01
Interaction4.41
Challenge4.49
Questions4.50
Maya Gabriela-Auiler Contreras 30 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.75
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.55
Reflection4.60
Respect4.85
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.60
Questions4.65
Asa Christopher Iacobucci 41 reported responses 4.03Eval / 5
Overall4.03 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.98
Technology3.59
Synthesis3.63
Collaboration3.09
Connection4.15
Contribution3.95
Discussion3.68
Inclusivity3.91
Grading3.02
Reflection3.86
Respect3.95
Creativity3.28
Feedback2.98
Interaction3.58
Challenge3.58
Questions3.64
Hannah Lyden 31 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.93
Technology4.63
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.47
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.37
Grading4.33
Reflection4.40
Respect4.83
Creativity4.07
Feedback3.10
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.35
Questions4.37
Lincoln Rychecky 53 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
53 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.23
Connection4.80
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.83
Reflection4.67
Respect4.77
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.67
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.53
Questions4.70
Matthew Sean Bravo 206 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5
206 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.34
Collaboration3.78
Connection4.72
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.36
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.33
Reflection4.37
Respect4.63
Creativity4.24
Feedback3.91
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.42
Questions4.51
Sophia Harris 153 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
153 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.27
Connection4.65
Contribution4.42
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.52
Grading4.25
Reflection4.68
Respect4.54
Creativity4.12
Feedback4.12
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.30
Questions4.46
Annabel Fay 156 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
156 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.49
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.78
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.24
Inclusivity4.89
Grading4.40
Reflection4.58
Respect4.61
Creativity4.39
Feedback3.84
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.30
Questions4.23
Austin Fitzgerald 61 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
61 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.53
Connection4.67
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.60
Reflection4.40
Respect4.83
Creativity4.03
Feedback4.27
Interaction4.43
Challenge4.33
Questions4.63
Skye Niles 26 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.03
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.63
Connection4.83
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.47
Reflection4.90
Respect4.83
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.27
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.50
Questions4.73
Nicole Aggarwal 29 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.37
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.07
Connection4.67
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.83
Grading4.77
Reflection4.63
Respect4.83
Creativity4.07
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.57
Questions4.83
Andrew S Gutierrez 32 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.13
Collaboration4.27
Connection4.70
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.17
Reflection4.57
Respect4.50
Creativity3.83
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.20
Questions4.33
Jay Grega 33 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.73
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.37
Reflection4.60
Respect4.73
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.17
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.77
Stephanie Ossovski Richter 68 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
68 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.36
Collaboration4.28
Connection4.74
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.66
Inclusivity4.78
Grading4.30
Reflection4.74
Respect4.64
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.46
Questions4.70
Robert Scott 32 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.70
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect4.55
Creativity3.80
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.45
Questions4.70
Ashley Myrtle Blinkhorn 34 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.47
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.73
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.00
Reflection4.47
Respect4.60
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.87
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.47
Questions4.50
Hanna Mcelduff 28 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.83
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.83
Grading4.67
Reflection4.77
Respect4.87
Creativity3.97
Feedback4.27
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.37
Questions4.80
Elan Rochell-Share 24 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.13
Technology3.77
Synthesis3.83
Collaboration4.27
Connection4.50
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.17
Reflection4.53
Respect4.67
Creativity3.87
Feedback3.73
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.17
Questions4.27
Eduardo Lievanos Medina 23 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration4.43
Connection4.50
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.47
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.43
Reflection4.50
Respect4.77
Creativity3.83
Feedback3.93
Interaction4.57
Challenge4.27
Questions4.20
Kate Mcneely 24 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.53
Connection4.67
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.47
Reflection4.63
Respect4.63
Creativity4.17
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.47
Challenge4.63
Questions4.57
Orem Ackley 26 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.47
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.33
Reflection4.30
Respect4.87
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.47
Challenge4.33
Questions4.40
Blade Wagner 69 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
69 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.38
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration3.71
Connection4.68
Contribution3.89
Discussion4.41
Inclusivity4.62
Grading4.36
Reflection4.34
Respect4.69
Creativity4.13
Feedback4.26
Interaction4.03
Challenge4.40
Questions4.54
Corey Mczeal 101 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
101 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.70
Questions4.50
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.