Course record RUSS
RUSS 1010
Beginning Russian 1
University of Colorado Boulder
232 grades15 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score48/100
Mixed record
Daria Molchanova 37 grades · 1 term 3.41GPA
37 letter grades
Compare with the course
Molchanova vs. the course average
A
+12.8
B
−2.5
C
−3.5
D
−2.6
F
−4.2
Difference in percentage points.
2.6% withdrew · 1 of 38 enrolled.
Overall4.69 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.89
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.93
Collaboration4.58
Connection4.93
Contribution4.97
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.93
Grading4.99
Reflection4.94
Respect5.00
Creativity4.93
Feedback4.99
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.96
Questions4.99
Madelyn Scarlett 29 grades · 1 term 3.14GPA
29 letter grades
Compare with the course
Scarlett vs. the course average
A
+0.4
B
same
C
−1.3
D
−2.6
F
+3.4
Difference in percentage points.
14.7% withdrew · 5 of 34 enrolled.
Overall4.75 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.88
Technology4.92
Synthesis4.84
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.88
Contribution4.92
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.96
Reflection4.90
Respect4.94
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.96
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.91
Questions4.98
Elena Yurievna Kostoglodova 51 grades · 1 term 2.94GPA
51 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kostoglodova vs. the course average
A
−11.6
B
+7.2
C
+2.1
D
+1.3
F
+0.9
Difference in percentage points.
3.8% withdrew · 2 of 53 enrolled.
Overall4.72 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.21
Technology4.37
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.41
Contribution4.56
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.06
Grading4.42
Reflection4.76
Respect4.95
Creativity4.36
Feedback4.56
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.85
Questions4.81
Beata Gallaher 10 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.31GPA
10 letter grades · Limited sample
16.7% withdrew · 2 of 12 enrolled.
Overall4.69 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.35
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.35
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.90
Questions4.60
Evangelina Romanovna Demina 23 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.23GPA
23 letter grades · Limited sample
11.5% withdrew · 3 of 26 enrolled.
Liya Zalaltdinova 23 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.19GPA
23 letter grades · Limited sample
11.5% withdrew · 3 of 26 enrolled.
Overall4.53 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.00
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.05
Reflection4.65
Respect4.65
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
Yuliana Gunn 21 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.19GPA
21 letter grades · Limited sample
4.5% withdrew · 1 of 22 enrolled.
Overall4.72 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.70
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.50
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Daria Ponomareva 16 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.17GPA
16 letter grades · Limited sample
5.9% withdrew · 1 of 17 enrolled.
Overall4.64 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.40
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.10
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Alla Konstantinovna Savelieva 12 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.01GPA
12 letter grades · Limited sample
14.3% withdrew · 2 of 14 enrolled.
Overall4.74 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.37
Synthesis4.69
Collaboration4.92
Connection4.49
Contribution4.69
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.10
Reflection4.48
Respect4.98
Creativity4.41
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.86
Questions4.92
Galina Nicoll 10 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.60GPA
10 letter grades · Limited sample
23.1% withdrew · 3 of 13 enrolled.
Galina Siarheichyk 7 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.70
Connection5.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.30
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.70
Daria Makarova 12 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.68
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.78
Collaboration4.29
Connection4.52
Contribution4.29
Discussion4.48
Inclusivity3.94
Grading3.96
Reflection4.48
Respect4.09
Creativity4.05
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.25
Challenge3.87
Questions4.50
Zhuldyz Tokbulatova 10 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Jillian Burgie Costello 13 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.90
Contribution4.95
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.90
Reflection4.90
Respect4.95
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.95
Questions4.95
Alexander Shotin 5 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.20
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.60
Reflection4.20
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.