Course record PSYC
PSYC 5541
Special Topics in Psychology
University of Colorado Boulder
72 grades12 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score83/100
Excellent
Matthew C Keller 27 grades · 1 term 3.90GPA
27 letter grades
Compare with the course
Keller vs. the course average
A
−1.9
B
+1.9
C
same
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
3.6% withdrew · 1 of 28 enrolled.
Overall4.24 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.29
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.34
Collaboration4.52
Connection3.82
Contribution4.72
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.13
Grading4.62
Reflection4.43
Respect4.95
Creativity4.82
Feedback4.56
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.86
Questions4.68
Leaf D Van Boven 24 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
24 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 24 enrolled.
Overall4.73 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.74
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.71
Collaboration4.74
Connection4.78
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.78
Reflection4.75
Respect4.78
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.76
Questions4.72
Eric John Pedersen Ph.D. 11 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
11 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 11 enrolled.
Karl G Hill 10 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.71GPA
10 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 10 enrolled.
Overall4.60 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.90
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.30
Reflection4.40
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.10
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Rosemary Cowell 4 reported responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.80
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Albert E. Kim 12 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.63
Contribution4.25
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.24
Reflection4.62
Respect4.85
Creativity4.39
Feedback4.39
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.85
Questions5.00
Eric Pedersen 5 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.40
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Marie Banich 4 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Andrew David Grotzinger 7 reported responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Cinnamon Bidwell 10 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.82
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.82
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.78
Grading4.98
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback3.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.82
Questions5.00
Matt Jones 5 reported responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.60
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.30
Grading2.50
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity2.50
Feedback3.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.40
Questions4.80
Chandra Ann Reynolds 9 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.95
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.52
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.85
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.62
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.