Course record PSYC
PSYC 3111
Psychological Science 2: Research Methods in Psychology
University of Colorado Boulder
2,527 grades86 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score51/100
Mixed record
Jennifer M Stratford Ph.D. 1,333 grades · 1 term 3.47GPA
1,333 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ph.D. vs. the course average
A
+7.8
B
−4.7
C
−2.5
D
−0.3
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
2.1% withdrew · 28 of 1,361 enrolled.
Kelly Gildersleeve 830 grades · 1 term 3.31GPA
830 letter grades
Compare with the course
Gildersleeve vs. the course average
A
−4.2
B
+2.1
C
+1.5
D
+0.6
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
3.8% withdrew · 33 of 863 enrolled.
Overall4.63 / 5
776 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.76
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration4.58
Connection4.61
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.76
Inclusivity4.47
Grading4.72
Reflection4.62
Respect4.82
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.36
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.63
Questions4.80
Angela Bryan 90 grades · 1 term 3.26GPA
90 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bryan vs. the course average
A
−12.3
B
+12.7
C
+1.8
D
−0.8
F
−1.3
Difference in percentage points.
1.1% withdrew · 1 of 91 enrolled.
Tiffany Anne Ito 186 grades · 1 term 3.11GPA
186 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ito vs. the course average
A
−18.6
B
+10.2
C
+7.3
D
−0.3
F
+1.3
Difference in percentage points.
3.6% withdrew · 7 of 193 enrolled.
Overall4.32 / 5
179 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.34
Collaboration4.49
Connection4.58
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.39
Grading4.31
Reflection4.49
Respect4.60
Creativity4.39
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.53
Questions4.40
Ryan Dean Curtis 88 grades · 1 term 3.05GPA
88 letter grades
Compare with the course
Curtis vs. the course average
A
−26.1
B
+17.1
C
+6.6
D
+0.3
F
+2.1
Difference in percentage points.
2.2% withdrew · 2 of 90 enrolled.
Overall4.41 / 5
389 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.34
Collaboration3.88
Connection4.41
Contribution4.34
Discussion4.66
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.59
Reflection4.56
Respect4.68
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.16
Interaction4.43
Challenge4.65
Questions4.72
Jennifer Marie Stratford 1,182 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
1,182 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.69
Collaboration4.78
Connection4.79
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.68
Grading4.86
Reflection4.76
Respect4.88
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.80
Questions4.92
Riley Nova Loria 80 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
80 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.29
Collaboration4.64
Connection4.39
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.63
Grading4.78
Reflection4.41
Respect4.80
Creativity4.36
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.54
Questions4.79
Bailey Starritt 24 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.10
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.90
Reflection4.20
Respect4.80
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.45
Emily Kramer 84 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
84 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.76
Connection4.24
Contribution4.36
Discussion4.48
Inclusivity4.36
Grading4.53
Reflection4.52
Respect4.87
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.48
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.57
Questions4.51
Chelsea Brown 61 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
61 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.19
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration4.52
Connection3.92
Contribution4.07
Discussion4.46
Inclusivity4.22
Grading4.55
Reflection4.32
Respect4.50
Creativity4.36
Feedback4.54
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.22
Questions4.53
Margaret Rose Tobias 22 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.10
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.70
Reflection4.30
Respect4.65
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.40
Questions4.40
Brittany Nicole Tokasey 39 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.14
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.18
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.01
Grading4.81
Reflection4.41
Respect4.71
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.50
Questions4.79
Jairo Andres Ramos 24 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.65
Connection3.80
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.75
Reflection3.95
Respect4.85
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.30
Questions4.55
Ashley Marie Master 74 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
74 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.56
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.39
Collaboration4.67
Connection4.36
Contribution4.32
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.63
Reflection4.58
Respect4.74
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.67
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.41
Questions4.71
Shelley Gresko 28 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.55
Connection3.40
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.40
Reflection3.85
Respect4.30
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.55
Challenge3.90
Questions4.35
Brynn A Paulsen 26 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.40
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.90
Reflection4.65
Respect4.95
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.85
Lauren Beth Finkelstein 49 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.70
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.13
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.73
Grading4.90
Reflection4.40
Respect4.77
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.82
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.45
Questions4.68
Cynthia Marie Villanueva 52 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5
52 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.23
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.45
Connection3.88
Contribution3.98
Discussion4.23
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.43
Reflection3.95
Respect4.53
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.20
Questions4.40
Louisa L Smith 109 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
109 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.61
Collaboration4.89
Connection4.49
Contribution4.61
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.89
Reflection4.75
Respect4.78
Creativity4.71
Feedback4.88
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.82
Questions4.84
Elizabeth Theresa Slivjak 25 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.15
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.50
Grading5.00
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.70
Questions4.85
Renee C Martin-Willett 22 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.35
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.65
Reflection4.55
Respect4.95
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.75
Questions4.80
Jennifer Catherine Cole 20 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.30
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.80
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.40
Questions4.90
Andrew Joseph Mertens 56 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
56 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.29
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.34
Collaboration4.66
Connection4.10
Contribution4.12
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.11
Grading4.58
Reflection4.23
Respect4.55
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.39
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.40
Questions4.57
Sheba Aikawa 88 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
88 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.49
Collaboration4.51
Connection4.11
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.59
Inclusivity4.21
Grading4.26
Reflection4.21
Respect4.70
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.21
Questions4.41
Joshua Elmore 26 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.30
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.85
Reflection4.50
Respect4.65
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Julia May Salinger 25 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.35
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.75
Reflection4.40
Respect4.90
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.40
Questions4.65
Stevi Glo Ibonie 123 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
123 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.74
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.66
Connection4.51
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.66
Grading4.88
Reflection4.69
Respect4.93
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.82
Questions4.86
Sean Andrew Reilly 119 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
119 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.83
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.73
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.51
Grading4.85
Reflection4.78
Respect4.99
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.99
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.92
Questions4.95
Emily Bansemer 49 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.52
Connection3.97
Contribution3.86
Discussion4.36
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.81
Reflection4.31
Respect4.81
Creativity4.23
Feedback4.48
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.28
Questions4.83
Sarah Ann Coffin 54 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
54 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration4.89
Connection4.67
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.90
Reflection4.60
Respect4.92
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.50
Questions4.79
Madeleine Gilliatt Wade 29 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.25
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.90
Reflection4.45
Respect4.85
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Tanya Barbara Horwitz 23 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.00
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.50
Reflection4.20
Respect4.85
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.10
Questions4.55
Elisa Fumika Stern 23 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.70
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Jacob Thomas Derosa 48 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
48 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.84
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.84
Grading4.85
Reflection4.60
Respect4.85
Creativity4.85
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.85
Questions5.00
Bailey Ann Steele 33 reported responses 3.93Eval / 5
Overall3.93 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.68
Technology3.94
Synthesis3.72
Collaboration4.45
Connection3.62
Contribution3.68
Discussion3.71
Inclusivity3.59
Grading3.43
Reflection3.77
Respect3.76
Creativity3.68
Feedback3.66
Interaction4.29
Challenge3.61
Questions3.71
Pia Sellery 74 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
74 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.51
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.44
Collaboration4.69
Connection4.39
Contribution4.19
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.39
Grading4.66
Reflection4.49
Respect4.70
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.61
Questions4.68
Emil Bansemer 64 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
64 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.81
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration4.69
Connection4.49
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.56
Grading4.93
Reflection4.49
Respect4.91
Creativity4.52
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.53
Questions4.80
Alex Rogers 90 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
90 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.86
Technology4.97
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration4.97
Connection4.85
Contribution4.76
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity4.86
Grading4.98
Reflection4.78
Respect4.99
Creativity4.86
Feedback4.66
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.77
Questions4.93
Ana Howard 46 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
46 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.76
Connection4.16
Contribution4.59
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.43
Grading4.80
Reflection4.46
Respect4.76
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.64
Challenge4.31
Questions4.87
Alane Schmelkin 27 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.65
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.90
Reflection4.60
Respect4.75
Creativity4.75
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.75
Questions4.90
Ola Nosarzewska 21 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.05
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.40
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.50
Reflection4.30
Respect4.50
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.10
Questions4.25
Brittany Whelan 22 reported responses 4.01Eval / 5
Overall4.01 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology3.85
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration4.65
Connection3.70
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.65
Grading4.00
Reflection3.85
Respect4.10
Creativity3.85
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.00
Questions3.85
Eleanor Goulden 23 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.60
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.95
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Emily Brown 65 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
65 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.48
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.53
Grading4.70
Reflection4.51
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.65
Questions4.70
Margy Chen 26 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.05
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.55
Reflection4.35
Respect4.50
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.40
Questions4.85
Hannah Kay Denker 27 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.45
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.65
Grading5.00
Reflection4.55
Respect5.00
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.65
Questions4.90
Samantha Natal 52 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
52 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.89
Connection4.58
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.66
Grading4.92
Reflection4.60
Respect4.88
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.74
Questions4.90
Eric Elias 67 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
67 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.97
Synthesis4.86
Collaboration4.79
Connection4.69
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.88
Grading4.95
Reflection4.88
Respect4.96
Creativity4.91
Feedback4.81
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.90
Questions4.95
Justin Gluck 72 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
72 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.92
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.86
Connection4.64
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.62
Grading4.82
Reflection4.59
Respect4.85
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.58
Questions4.94
Jennifer Gove 24 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.30
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.70
Reflection4.50
Respect4.85
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.50
Questions4.85
Cindy Villanueva 25 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.35
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.75
Reflection4.55
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.60
Questions4.75
Bryn Manns 49 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.65
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.79
Grading4.92
Reflection4.72
Respect4.88
Creativity4.91
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.87
Questions4.89
Journey Simmons 77 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
77 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.49
Collaboration4.64
Connection4.51
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.72
Grading4.63
Reflection4.44
Respect4.84
Creativity4.56
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.47
Questions4.78
Luiza Rosa 28 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.55
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.90
Reflection4.65
Respect5.00
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.90
Questions4.70
Jacqui Fallon 53 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
53 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.86
Collaboration4.64
Connection4.53
Contribution4.52
Discussion3.92
Inclusivity4.87
Grading4.91
Reflection4.85
Respect4.93
Creativity4.61
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.56
Questions4.93
Lucie Vleugels 44 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.37
Synthesis4.36
Collaboration4.49
Connection4.05
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.27
Grading4.12
Reflection4.17
Respect4.66
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.64
Interaction4.52
Challenge4.36
Questions4.62
Andrew Cummings 342 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
342 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.42
Collaboration4.54
Connection4.78
Contribution4.34
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity4.56
Grading4.65
Reflection4.63
Respect4.75
Creativity4.46
Feedback4.22
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.56
Questions4.83
Anika Sansgiry 37 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.76
Connection4.34
Contribution4.39
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.59
Grading4.85
Reflection4.50
Respect4.91
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.61
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.38
Questions4.85
Julisa Granados 55 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
55 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.64
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.41
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.64
Contribution4.52
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity4.28
Grading4.91
Reflection4.44
Respect4.98
Creativity4.46
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.58
Questions4.90
Alex Barone 49 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.93
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.94
Contribution3.92
Discussion4.42
Inclusivity4.38
Grading4.41
Reflection4.26
Respect4.50
Creativity4.27
Feedback4.24
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.22
Questions4.61
Emily Schell 453 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
453 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.56
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.76
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.61
Reflection4.71
Respect4.87
Creativity4.46
Feedback4.28
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.66
Questions4.82
Sarah Gonzalez-Coffin 49 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.84
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.58
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.69
Grading4.94
Reflection4.63
Respect4.81
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.75
Questions4.90
Reese Lavers 52 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
52 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.44
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.99
Reflection4.58
Respect4.84
Creativity4.71
Feedback4.84
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.70
Questions4.94
Lili Geel 26 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.65
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.65
Connection3.65
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.55
Reflection4.10
Respect4.55
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.10
Questions4.75
Chloe Mcghee 29 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.50
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.90
Reflection4.60
Respect4.75
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.95
Brandon Cohen 24 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.25
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.85
Reflection4.35
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.35
Questions4.90
Anika Lindley 24 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.40
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.90
Reflection4.40
Respect4.75
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.55
Questions5.00
Mateo Chavez 20 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.60
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.85
Reflection4.75
Respect4.90
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.85
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.85
Questions4.90
Alexandra Liepmann 21 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.55
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.80
Reflection4.85
Respect4.90
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.75
Questions4.75
Alaina Di Dio 21 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.25
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.95
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.55
Questions4.80
Istneydina Thomas 44 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.54
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.78
Connection4.70
Contribution4.38
Discussion4.56
Inclusivity4.82
Grading4.27
Reflection4.67
Respect4.73
Creativity4.66
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.63
Questions4.27
Veronica Scot Derricks 101 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
101 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.42
Technology4.49
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.62
Connection4.50
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.58
Inclusivity4.62
Grading4.47
Reflection4.35
Respect4.72
Creativity4.07
Feedback3.84
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.42
Questions4.55
Nadia Floyd 47 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
47 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.91
Technology4.01
Synthesis3.81
Collaboration4.29
Connection3.99
Contribution3.96
Discussion3.82
Inclusivity4.44
Grading3.72
Reflection3.88
Respect4.47
Creativity3.72
Feedback3.48
Interaction4.25
Challenge3.68
Questions3.64
Olivia Stine 51 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
51 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.64
Synthesis4.19
Collaboration4.54
Connection4.18
Contribution3.97
Discussion4.43
Inclusivity4.32
Grading4.59
Reflection4.30
Respect4.62
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.54
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.30
Questions4.60
Rayan Elahi 12 reported responses 3.86Eval / 5
Overall3.86 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.10
Connection3.60
Contribution3.60
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.90
Reflection4.00
Respect4.30
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.20
Questions3.90
Jisoo Kim 21 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.66
Technology4.51
Synthesis4.66
Collaboration4.43
Connection4.09
Contribution4.46
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.51
Grading4.14
Reflection4.48
Respect4.55
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.51
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.58
Questions4.45
Abby Hultquist 26 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.68
Connection4.44
Contribution4.21
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.44
Grading4.79
Reflection4.54
Respect4.82
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.88
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.75
Questions4.85
Ellie Nnatubeugo 17 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.22
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.37
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity4.43
Grading3.92
Reflection4.29
Respect4.71
Creativity4.27
Feedback3.56
Interaction4.70
Challenge3.91
Questions4.29
Claire Pince 25 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.31
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.19
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity4.27
Grading4.54
Reflection4.31
Respect4.85
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.46
Questions4.65
Anabel Salimian 30 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.91
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.44
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.89
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.88
Reflection4.82
Respect4.89
Creativity4.79
Feedback4.93
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.77
Questions4.92
Rosha Rashidi 31 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.16
Collaboration4.42
Connection4.17
Contribution4.08
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.50
Reflection4.33
Respect4.89
Creativity4.31
Feedback4.44
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.27
Questions4.44
Sofia Barnes-Horowitz 16 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.35
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.70
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.65
Questions4.90
Megan Brown 44 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.86
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.83
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.68
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.63
Grading4.81
Reflection4.83
Respect4.91
Creativity4.82
Feedback4.81
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.87
Questions4.91
Coralie Phanord 15 reported responses 3.68Eval / 5
Overall3.68 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.05
Synthesis3.65
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.60
Contribution3.45
Discussion3.45
Inclusivity3.95
Grading3.60
Reflection3.85
Respect3.70
Creativity3.40
Feedback3.65
Interaction3.75
Challenge3.65
Questions3.50
Ashby Cogan 52 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
52 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.12
Contribution4.39
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity4.33
Grading4.48
Reflection4.32
Respect4.61
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.62
Questions4.40
Amber Mikkelsen 21 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.40
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.50
Reflection4.40
Respect4.87
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.37
Questions4.53
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.