Course record PSYC
PSYC 2145
Introductory Cognitive Psychology
University of Colorado Boulder
3,418 grades14 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score18/100
Needs work
Roland Benoit 189 grades · 1 term 3.52GPA
189 letter grades
Compare with the course
Benoit vs. the course average
A
+23.4
B
−7.3
C
−11.1
D
−4.0
F
−1.0
Difference in percentage points.
1.0% withdrew · 2 of 191 enrolled.
Overall4.13 / 5
432 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.19
Technology4.51
Synthesis4.09
Collaboration3.54
Connection4.58
Contribution3.87
Discussion4.47
Inclusivity4.02
Grading4.31
Reflection4.48
Respect4.60
Creativity3.91
Feedback3.48
Interaction4.37
Challenge4.40
Questions4.58
Ronald Mckell Carter Carston 576 grades · 1 term 3.32GPA
576 letter grades
Compare with the course
Carston vs. the course average
A
+11.4
B
−0.8
C
−7.4
D
−2.3
F
−1.0
Difference in percentage points.
2.2% withdrew · 13 of 589 enrolled.
David E Huber 194 grades · 1 term 3.29GPA
194 letter grades
Compare with the course
Huber vs. the course average
A
+7.3
B
+1.3
C
−4.5
D
−3.0
F
−1.0
Difference in percentage points.
1.0% withdrew · 2 of 196 enrolled.
Overall4.10 / 5
151 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.20
Connection4.50
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.30
Respect4.50
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.30
Questions4.50
Akira Miyake 1,076 grades · 1 term 2.99GPA
1,076 letter grades
Compare with the course
Miyake vs. the course average
A
−2.5
B
+0.3
C
+1.1
D
−0.3
F
+1.4
Difference in percentage points.
3.2% withdrew · 36 of 1,112 enrolled.
Overall4.16 / 5
1,054 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.06
Technology4.35
Synthesis3.96
Collaboration3.21
Connection4.44
Contribution3.89
Discussion4.44
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.34
Reflection4.54
Respect4.44
Creativity3.83
Feedback3.61
Interaction4.03
Challenge4.42
Questions4.37
Shaw L. Ketels 179 grades · 1 term 2.98GPA
179 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ketels vs. the course average
A
+5.1
B
−6.8
C
−1.9
D
−0.1
F
+3.6
Difference in percentage points.
1.6% withdrew · 3 of 182 enrolled.
Overall4.49 / 5
180 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.06
Collaboration4.06
Connection4.51
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.44
Inclusivity4.19
Grading4.25
Reflection4.64
Respect4.51
Creativity3.99
Feedback3.81
Interaction4.59
Challenge4.40
Questions4.39
Karli K Carston 758 grades · 1 term 2.98GPA
758 letter grades
Compare with the course
Carston vs. the course average
A
−8.9
B
+5.1
C
+3.9
D
+1.7
F
−1.8
Difference in percentage points.
1.8% withdrew · 14 of 772 enrolled.
Overall4.05 / 5
334 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.30
Synthesis3.97
Collaboration3.16
Connection4.54
Contribution3.67
Discussion4.09
Inclusivity3.92
Grading4.31
Reflection4.36
Respect4.42
Creativity3.59
Feedback3.09
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.28
Questions4.22
Albert E. Kim 427 grades · 1 term 2.78GPA
427 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kim vs. the course average
A
−11.9
B
−1.5
C
+8.7
D
+4.2
F
+0.5
Difference in percentage points.
3.4% withdrew · 15 of 442 enrolled.
Overall3.52 / 5
230 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology4.08
Synthesis3.55
Collaboration2.61
Connection4.30
Contribution3.08
Discussion3.91
Inclusivity3.73
Grading3.81
Reflection4.02
Respect4.31
Creativity3.22
Feedback2.83
Interaction3.76
Challenge3.84
Questions3.91
Shane Ross Schwikert 19 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
19 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 19 enrolled.
Overall4.79 / 5
85 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.66
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.76
Collaboration4.22
Connection4.79
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.43
Grading4.81
Reflection4.87
Respect4.85
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.81
Questions4.85
Cheri King 154 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
154 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.76
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.17
Connection4.77
Contribution4.42
Discussion4.51
Inclusivity4.68
Grading4.52
Reflection4.71
Respect4.74
Creativity4.61
Feedback4.44
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.66
Questions4.52
Helen Yankovich 7 reported responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.04
Synthesis4.26
Collaboration4.57
Connection3.61
Contribution4.13
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity3.61
Grading3.39
Reflection3.70
Respect4.48
Creativity4.57
Feedback2.52
Interaction4.35
Challenge3.70
Questions2.96
Ronald Mckell Carston 448 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5
448 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.11
Connection4.50
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.20
Reflection4.50
Respect4.40
Creativity3.51
Feedback2.92
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.50
Questions4.40
Louisa L Smith 1 reported responses 3.29Eval / 5
Overall3.29 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration1.00
Connection4.00
Contribution1.00
Inclusivity2.00
Reflection4.00
Interaction5.00
Andrew Joseph Mertens 19 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.50
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.60
Respect4.60
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
James Ernest Crum 131 reported responses 3.83Eval / 5
Overall3.83 / 5
131 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.42
Synthesis3.78
Collaboration2.88
Connection4.32
Contribution3.22
Discussion3.79
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.25
Reflection4.00
Respect4.42
Creativity3.41
Feedback3.15
Interaction3.85
Challenge4.08
Questions4.45
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.