Course record PSYC
PSYC 2111
Psychological Science I: Statistics
University of Colorado Boulder
2,934 grades79 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score24/100
Below average
Jennifer M Stratford Ph.D. 89 grades · 1 term 3.59GPA
89 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ph.D. vs. the course average
A
+28.2
B
−10.9
C
−9.3
D
−4.2
F
−3.7
Difference in percentage points.
3.3% withdrew · 3 of 92 enrolled.
Matthew Carl Jones 358 grades · 1 term 3.14GPA
358 letter grades
Compare with the course
Jones vs. the course average
A
+1.5
B
+4.3
C
−2.6
D
−1.2
F
−2.1
Difference in percentage points.
4.3% withdrew · 16 of 374 enrolled.
Overall4.22 / 5
96 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.65
Synthesis3.87
Collaboration3.51
Connection3.97
Contribution3.67
Discussion4.17
Inclusivity3.78
Grading4.35
Reflection4.27
Respect4.62
Creativity3.89
Feedback3.92
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.35
Questions4.47
Joshua Raphael Correll 427 grades · 1 term 3.12GPA
427 letter grades
Compare with the course
Correll vs. the course average
A
+2.1
B
+2.7
C
−2.4
D
−2.4
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
5.7% withdrew · 26 of 453 enrolled.
Overall4.46 / 5
234 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.68
Technology4.53
Synthesis3.52
Collaboration4.52
Connection3.00
Contribution4.39
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity3.82
Grading4.25
Reflection3.68
Respect4.53
Creativity4.24
Feedback4.07
Interaction4.71
Challenge4.36
Questions4.46
Andrew Cummings 230 grades · 1 term 3.11GPA
230 letter grades
Compare with the course
Cummings vs. the course average
A
+3.3
B
−2.1
C
−0.2
D
+0.1
F
−1.1
Difference in percentage points.
0.4% withdrew · 1 of 231 enrolled.
Overall4.33 / 5
107 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.10
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.60
Reflection4.35
Respect4.65
Creativity3.95
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.35
Questions4.75
Ryan Dean Curtis 1,165 grades · 1 term 2.98GPA
1,165 letter grades
Compare with the course
Curtis vs. the course average
A
+1.4
B
−4.6
C
+0.7
D
+1.8
F
+0.7
Difference in percentage points.
3.7% withdrew · 45 of 1,210 enrolled.
Overall4.30 / 5
1,114 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.12
Technology4.71
Synthesis3.97
Collaboration4.02
Connection4.07
Contribution3.86
Discussion4.47
Inclusivity3.59
Grading4.51
Reflection4.54
Respect4.48
Creativity3.99
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.41
Challenge4.40
Questions4.53
Michael C Stallings 404 grades · 1 term 2.93GPA
404 letter grades
Compare with the course
Stallings vs. the course average
A
−7.3
B
+6.2
C
+1.9
D
−1.5
F
+0.7
Difference in percentage points.
3.8% withdrew · 16 of 420 enrolled.
Overall4.00 / 5
183 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.08
Technology4.32
Synthesis3.81
Collaboration3.32
Connection4.15
Contribution3.87
Discussion4.16
Inclusivity3.99
Grading4.14
Reflection4.12
Respect4.42
Creativity3.86
Feedback3.55
Interaction4.18
Challenge4.21
Questions4.42
Matthew C Keller 170 grades · 1 term 2.80GPA
170 letter grades
Compare with the course
Keller vs. the course average
A
−13.2
B
+9.0
C
+2.3
D
−0.1
F
+2.1
Difference in percentage points.
4.0% withdrew · 7 of 177 enrolled.
Overall3.44 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology3.60
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration3.20
Connection3.40
Contribution3.30
Discussion3.50
Inclusivity2.70
Grading3.40
Reflection3.50
Respect3.80
Creativity3.60
Feedback2.80
Interaction3.90
Challenge3.60
Questions3.70
Brooke Marie Huibregtse 91 grades · 1 term 2.77GPA
91 letter grades
Compare with the course
Huibregtse vs. the course average
A
−11.8
B
+0.7
C
+9.2
D
+3.5
F
−1.6
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 91 enrolled.
Overall3.79 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration3.10
Connection3.80
Contribution3.30
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.00
Reflection3.70
Respect4.70
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.80
Questions4.20
Chelsea Brown 1 reported responses 3.60Eval / 5
Overall3.60 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion3.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.00
Reflection3.00
Respect4.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.00
Questions4.00
Katie Paulich 1 reported responses 4.94Eval / 5
Overall4.94 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Technology4.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Spencer Michael Moore 92 reported responses 3.85Eval / 5
Overall3.85 / 5
92 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.63
Technology4.19
Synthesis3.26
Collaboration4.01
Connection3.31
Contribution3.38
Discussion4.12
Inclusivity2.98
Grading3.54
Reflection3.75
Respect4.23
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.56
Interaction4.07
Challenge3.91
Questions4.27
Chelsea Andra Taylor 112 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
112 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.19
Collaboration4.46
Connection4.35
Contribution4.19
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity3.82
Grading4.79
Reflection4.46
Respect4.90
Creativity4.26
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.55
Questions4.83
Tanya Barbara Horwitz 66 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5
66 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.81
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.58
Connection3.47
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity3.23
Grading4.17
Reflection4.19
Respect4.51
Creativity3.78
Feedback4.08
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.14
Questions4.50
Spencer Dudley 69 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
69 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.09
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.29
Grading4.52
Reflection4.59
Respect4.89
Creativity4.64
Feedback4.61
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.77
Questions4.70
Charleen J Gust 29 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.50
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.55
Reflection4.70
Respect4.95
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.85
Questions4.90
Matthew Puretz 75 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
75 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.22
Collaboration4.41
Connection3.97
Contribution3.98
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity3.81
Grading4.52
Reflection4.20
Respect4.77
Creativity4.31
Feedback4.64
Interaction4.52
Challenge4.61
Questions4.81
Diane K Martichuski 87 reported responses 3.71Eval / 5
Overall3.71 / 5
87 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.49
Technology4.01
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration2.98
Connection3.45
Contribution3.64
Discussion3.65
Inclusivity3.95
Grading3.87
Reflection3.82
Respect4.36
Creativity2.97
Feedback3.96
Interaction3.94
Challenge3.98
Questions3.93
Nathan Anderson 18 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.00
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.10
Reflection4.05
Respect4.65
Creativity4.45
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.05
Questions4.30
Pamela Nicole Romero Villela 37 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.15
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.35
Reflection4.45
Respect4.85
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.55
Questions4.85
Jennifer Marie Stratford 126 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
126 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.60
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.90
Reflection4.80
Respect4.95
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Brandon Marquart 20 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.40
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.80
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
James Alan Kole 20 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.76
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration4.56
Connection4.51
Contribution4.39
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.27
Reflection4.47
Respect4.78
Creativity4.13
Feedback4.48
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.22
Questions4.73
Amanda Kelly Lococo 3 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.70
Connection2.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.30
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Lydia Rader 39 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.55
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.25
Grading5.00
Reflection4.75
Respect5.00
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.85
Questions5.00
Elizabeth Theresa Slivjak 38 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.40
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.75
Reflection4.55
Respect4.75
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.60
Questions4.85
Abraham Ray Ybarra 24 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.43
Connection3.83
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.46
Inclusivity3.68
Grading4.44
Reflection4.12
Respect4.49
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.39
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.43
Questions4.73
Mikaela Ann Rowe 52 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
52 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.61
Synthesis4.31
Collaboration4.49
Connection4.19
Contribution4.32
Discussion4.42
Inclusivity3.98
Grading4.70
Reflection4.63
Respect4.56
Creativity4.18
Feedback4.27
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.35
Questions4.55
Marrissa D Grant 27 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.54
Synthesis4.17
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.12
Contribution3.92
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity3.74
Grading4.66
Reflection4.01
Respect4.66
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.42
Interaction4.33
Challenge4.26
Questions4.35
Elena Chu Peterson 49 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.51
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.57
Contribution4.52
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.44
Grading4.76
Reflection4.69
Respect4.83
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.69
Interaction4.71
Challenge4.72
Questions4.92
Julia May Salinger 30 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.43
Contribution4.83
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.77
Reflection4.73
Respect4.83
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.87
Madeleine Gilliatt Wade 62 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
62 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.49
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.10
Contribution4.06
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.40
Reflection4.52
Respect4.92
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.66
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.70
Questions4.74
Emily Brown 45 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
45 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.02
Technology4.99
Synthesis3.54
Collaboration4.04
Connection3.99
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.51
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.98
Reflection4.03
Respect4.99
Creativity4.01
Feedback4.03
Interaction4.51
Challenge3.56
Questions4.99
Sonia Tremblay 91 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
91 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.29
Technology4.92
Synthesis4.11
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.11
Contribution4.03
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity3.64
Grading4.58
Reflection4.60
Respect4.78
Creativity4.37
Feedback4.69
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.53
Questions4.88
Margy Chen 26 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.45
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.05
Grading4.90
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.65
Questions4.95
Eleanor Goulden 38 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.99
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.51
Connection4.99
Contribution4.99
Discussion4.51
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.01
Reflection4.50
Respect4.01
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.51
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Alex Flores 25 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.60
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity3.45
Grading4.60
Reflection4.55
Respect4.85
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.85
Questions4.80
Joongsan Hwang 99 reported responses 3.60Eval / 5
Overall3.60 / 5
99 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.43
Technology4.14
Synthesis3.37
Collaboration3.82
Connection3.28
Contribution3.15
Discussion3.67
Inclusivity2.95
Grading3.26
Reflection3.56
Respect3.84
Creativity3.28
Feedback3.17
Interaction3.99
Challenge3.35
Questions4.06
Pritalee Kadam 12 reported responses 3.29Eval / 5
Overall3.29 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology3.70
Synthesis3.45
Collaboration3.65
Connection3.25
Contribution3.15
Discussion3.55
Inclusivity2.90
Grading2.80
Reflection3.55
Respect4.05
Creativity3.40
Feedback2.50
Interaction3.60
Challenge3.45
Questions4.20
Jennifer Marie Weber 31 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.40
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.55
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.75
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.65
Questions4.90
Mario Choy 68 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5
68 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.07
Technology4.53
Synthesis3.92
Collaboration4.43
Connection3.68
Contribution3.83
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.07
Reflection3.98
Respect4.61
Creativity3.97
Feedback3.96
Interaction4.46
Challenge3.84
Questions4.37
Raegan Rychecky 23 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.85
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.05
Grading4.75
Reflection4.35
Respect4.50
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Chinmay Agrawal 23 reported responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.10
Connection3.85
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.55
Grading3.95
Reflection4.25
Respect4.35
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.65
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.20
Questions4.40
Rahul Kumar Mohan Kumar 30 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.85
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.30
Connection3.70
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity3.40
Grading3.95
Reflection4.15
Respect4.40
Creativity3.70
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.20
Questions4.65
Bailey Ann Steele 25 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.16
Technology4.59
Synthesis3.82
Collaboration4.04
Connection3.97
Contribution3.97
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.93
Grading4.31
Reflection4.15
Respect4.47
Creativity3.82
Feedback4.27
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.21
Questions4.52
Katherine Walsh 19 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.05
Collaboration4.10
Connection3.45
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.20
Grading4.40
Reflection4.25
Respect4.55
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.75
Questions4.85
Lynneatte Quenin 49 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.87
Synthesis3.97
Collaboration4.01
Connection3.77
Contribution3.81
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity3.14
Grading4.73
Reflection4.34
Respect4.42
Creativity4.39
Feedback4.51
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.37
Questions4.75
Jeremy Lawrence 19 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.40
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.95
Reflection4.80
Respect4.85
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.85
Questions5.00
Noah Berley 19 reported responses 3.32Eval / 5
Overall3.32 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.20
Technology3.45
Synthesis3.05
Collaboration3.40
Connection3.25
Contribution2.90
Discussion3.35
Inclusivity3.10
Grading3.20
Reflection3.35
Respect4.00
Creativity2.90
Feedback2.70
Interaction3.90
Challenge3.50
Questions3.70
Dani Grant 17 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.80
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.35
Reflection4.40
Respect4.85
Creativity4.05
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.45
Questions4.80
Matt Jones 121 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5
121 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration3.33
Connection4.20
Contribution3.67
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.20
Reflection4.33
Respect4.43
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.93
Interaction4.27
Challenge4.30
Questions4.57
Kushal Nagarajan 11 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.15
Connection4.10
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.50
Reflection4.60
Respect4.95
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Manan Doshi 41 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.49
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.42
Collaboration4.28
Connection4.40
Contribution4.07
Discussion4.42
Inclusivity4.22
Grading4.33
Reflection4.67
Respect4.57
Creativity4.44
Feedback4.61
Interaction4.47
Challenge4.48
Questions4.84
Jennifer Catherine Cole 23 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.66
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.39
Collaboration3.85
Connection4.77
Contribution4.44
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.56
Grading4.11
Reflection4.58
Respect4.77
Creativity4.33
Feedback3.98
Interaction4.61
Challenge4.75
Questions4.09
Luke Schaffer 36 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.00
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.45
Reflection4.55
Respect4.80
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Mateo Chavez 25 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.50
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.95
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.90
Questions4.95
Rayan Elahi 26 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.86
Technology4.96
Synthesis4.83
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.84
Contribution4.81
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.90
Reflection4.89
Respect4.95
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.93
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.92
Questions4.95
Aaptha Boggaram 36 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.18
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.01
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.22
Contribution3.92
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.21
Grading4.68
Reflection4.49
Respect4.73
Creativity4.26
Feedback4.76
Interaction4.52
Challenge4.43
Questions4.92
Ben Giber 40 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.76
Synthesis4.18
Collaboration4.41
Connection4.03
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity3.88
Grading4.65
Reflection4.63
Respect4.78
Creativity4.46
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.56
Challenge4.74
Questions4.90
Jisoo Kim 13 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.50
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.40
Reflection4.45
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.85
Questions4.85
Irena Kesselring 25 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.15
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.73
Reflection4.62
Respect4.78
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.82
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.57
Questions4.85
Gavriil Shchedrin 53 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
53 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.00
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.90
Grading3.90
Reflection4.10
Respect4.50
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.40
Questions4.50
Shriprajwal Krishnamurthy 18 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.70
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.00
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.05
Reflection4.20
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.45
Questions4.70
Ryan Thurman 34 reported responses 3.49Eval / 5
Overall3.49 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology3.20
Synthesis3.20
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.40
Contribution3.20
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.40
Reflection3.50
Respect4.30
Creativity3.70
Feedback2.80
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.50
Questions3.50
Prathik Bharath Jain 7 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration2.60
Connection3.40
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.80
Reflection3.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Irene Delatorre 14 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.60
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.90
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.80
Questions4.95
Brynn A Paulsen 13 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.91
Technology5.00
Synthesis3.74
Collaboration4.78
Connection4.04
Contribution3.91
Discussion4.48
Inclusivity3.52
Grading4.61
Reflection4.30
Respect4.83
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.61
Interaction4.52
Challenge4.52
Questions4.91
Amber Mikkelsen 23 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.65
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.45
Connection3.90
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.35
Grading4.20
Reflection4.40
Respect4.50
Creativity3.95
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.30
Questions4.70
Angie Gross 22 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.25
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.05
Reflection4.55
Respect4.65
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.30
Ryan John Goffredi 137 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
137 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.29
Technology4.74
Synthesis4.09
Collaboration4.11
Connection4.33
Contribution4.13
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity3.87
Grading4.66
Reflection4.47
Respect4.72
Creativity4.17
Feedback4.19
Interaction4.37
Challenge4.51
Questions4.78
Amy Texter 15 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.45
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.95
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Emily Haynes 43 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.34
Technology4.99
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration4.61
Connection4.06
Contribution4.38
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.71
Grading4.68
Reflection4.62
Respect4.85
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.54
Challenge4.75
Questions4.92
Anika Lindley 21 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.05
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.80
Reflection4.75
Respect4.75
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Alex Rogers 20 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.25
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.65
Reflection4.65
Respect4.85
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.65
Questions4.85
Kaleigh Clarke 30 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.48
Connection4.22
Contribution4.46
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity4.36
Grading4.76
Reflection4.68
Respect4.81
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.64
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.73
Questions4.83
Youngki Hong 47 reported responses 2.94Eval / 5
Overall2.94 / 5
47 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.10
Technology3.40
Synthesis2.50
Collaboration2.20
Connection3.10
Contribution3.40
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity2.50
Grading3.00
Reflection3.00
Respect3.80
Creativity2.50
Feedback1.90
Interaction3.10
Challenge3.10
Questions3.30
Saksham Khatwani 12 reported responses 3.95Eval / 5
Overall3.95 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration3.75
Connection3.95
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.20
Reflection3.75
Respect4.50
Creativity3.35
Feedback3.85
Interaction3.85
Challenge3.65
Questions4.60
Ankur Varma 6 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.70
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.10
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.20
Reflection4.30
Respect4.50
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.10
Questions4.10
Luiza Rosa 38 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.65
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.30
Connection3.65
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.60
Reflection4.45
Respect4.50
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.35
Questions4.35
Vinay Rajesh 30 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.60
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.55
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.55
Grading4.15
Reflection4.50
Respect4.60
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.35
Questions4.35
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.