Course record PSYC
PSYC 1001
General Psychology
University of Colorado Boulder
10,769 grades26 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score28/100
Below average
Beth Harrington 37 grades · 1 term 3.70GPA
37 letter grades
Compare with the course
Harrington vs. the course average
A
+37.0
B
−23.1
C
−9.5
D
−3.6
F
−0.8
Difference in percentage points.
2.6% withdrew · 1 of 38 enrolled.
Overall3.32 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology3.31
Synthesis3.49
Collaboration2.95
Connection4.49
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.03
Inclusivity4.42
Grading3.26
Reflection3.65
Respect4.04
Creativity3.01
Feedback2.84
Interaction4.24
Challenge3.26
Questions3.51
Jennifer M Stratford Ph.D. 1,611 grades · 1 term 3.45GPA
1,611 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ph.D. vs. the course average
A
+14.5
B
−5.3
C
−5.2
D
−2.0
F
−2.0
Difference in percentage points.
1.6% withdrew · 26 of 1,637 enrolled.
Chelsea Patrick Pierotti 376 grades · 1 term 3.40GPA
376 letter grades
Compare with the course
Pierotti vs. the course average
A
+14.4
B
−4.9
C
−8.7
D
−0.7
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
1.8% withdrew · 7 of 383 enrolled.
Overall4.24 / 5
136 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.12
Collaboration3.75
Connection4.88
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.68
Grading4.63
Reflection4.55
Respect4.70
Creativity4.12
Feedback3.84
Interaction4.47
Challenge4.35
Questions4.81
Shaw L. Ketels 54 grades · 1 term 3.33GPA
54 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ketels vs. the course average
A
+0.5
B
+7.7
C
−1.1
D
−3.6
F
−3.5
Difference in percentage points.
3.6% withdrew · 2 of 56 enrolled.
Overall4.19 / 5
381 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.24
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.11
Collaboration4.07
Connection4.36
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.44
Inclusivity4.38
Grading4.23
Reflection4.36
Respect4.58
Creativity4.07
Feedback3.65
Interaction4.43
Challenge4.37
Questions4.23
Lorna Cinnamon Bidwell Kovalev 1,083 grades · 1 term 3.31GPA
1,083 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kovalev vs. the course average
A
+3.5
B
+1.8
C
−2.2
D
−1.1
F
−2.0
Difference in percentage points.
1.5% withdrew · 16 of 1,099 enrolled.
Andrew Cummings 508 grades · 1 term 3.28GPA
508 letter grades
Compare with the course
Cummings vs. the course average
A
+9.8
B
−8.4
C
−1.7
D
−0.1
F
+0.4
Difference in percentage points.
1.6% withdrew · 8 of 516 enrolled.
Overall4.56 / 5
210 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.79
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration4.76
Connection4.91
Contribution4.76
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.97
Reflection4.74
Respect4.88
Creativity4.52
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.75
Questions4.98
Kelly Gildersleeve 2,210 grades · 1 term 3.15GPA
2,210 letter grades
Compare with the course
Gildersleeve vs. the course average
A
+2.4
B
−4.9
C
+1.0
D
+0.6
F
+0.9
Difference in percentage points.
2.5% withdrew · 57 of 2,267 enrolled.
Overall4.38 / 5
1,988 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.22
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.22
Collaboration3.62
Connection4.66
Contribution3.88
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.58
Reflection4.53
Respect4.78
Creativity3.98
Feedback3.87
Interaction4.47
Challenge4.42
Questions4.70
D Brett King 1,853 grades · 1 term 3.09GPA
1,853 letter grades
Compare with the course
King vs. the course average
A
−8.6
B
+8.1
C
+1.7
D
−0.5
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
2.1% withdrew · 39 of 1,892 enrolled.
Overall4.25 / 5
552 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.67
Technology4.84
Synthesis3.55
Collaboration4.09
Connection4.33
Contribution4.14
Discussion3.63
Inclusivity3.88
Grading4.44
Reflection4.37
Respect4.68
Creativity3.67
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.54
Challenge4.70
Questions4.04
Angela Bryan 814 grades · 1 term 3.02GPA
814 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bryan vs. the course average
A
−7.3
B
+2.0
C
+3.9
D
+0.2
F
+1.3
Difference in percentage points.
2.4% withdrew · 20 of 834 enrolled.
Overall4.20 / 5
354 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.11
Technology4.42
Synthesis3.84
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.51
Contribution3.81
Discussion4.22
Inclusivity4.14
Grading4.23
Reflection4.39
Respect4.60
Creativity3.98
Feedback3.23
Interaction4.42
Challenge4.20
Questions4.33
Ryan Dean Curtis 2,223 grades · 1 term 2.96GPA
2,223 letter grades
Compare with the course
Curtis vs. the course average
A
−10.1
B
+3.4
C
+3.0
D
+1.9
F
+1.7
Difference in percentage points.
2.6% withdrew · 60 of 2,283 enrolled.
Overall4.19 / 5
1,984 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.19
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.13
Collaboration3.49
Connection4.65
Contribution3.66
Discussion4.32
Inclusivity4.37
Grading4.63
Reflection4.44
Respect4.66
Creativity4.06
Feedback3.69
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.41
Questions4.55
Margy Chen 1 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Synthesis2.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.00
Contribution3.00
Inclusivity3.00
Reflection4.00
Interaction5.00
Jennifer A. J. Schwartz 112 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
112 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.74
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.46
Connection4.79
Contribution4.76
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.41
Grading4.58
Reflection4.71
Respect4.79
Creativity4.61
Feedback4.66
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.71
Questions4.86
Jennifer Marie Stratford 1,015 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
1,015 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.36
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.28
Connection4.66
Contribution4.06
Discussion4.66
Inclusivity4.54
Grading4.67
Reflection4.54
Respect4.74
Creativity4.14
Feedback4.09
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.47
Questions4.74
Michael R Freedman 95 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
95 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology3.87
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration4.27
Connection4.85
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.34
Grading4.58
Reflection4.68
Respect4.89
Creativity4.25
Feedback3.88
Interaction4.64
Challenge4.79
Questions4.80
L Cinnamon Bidwell 235 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
235 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration4.25
Connection4.68
Contribution4.08
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.48
Grading4.50
Reflection4.58
Respect4.70
Creativity4.15
Feedback3.78
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.62
Jenny Schwartz 251 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
251 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.66
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.79
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.69
Grading4.67
Reflection4.75
Respect4.91
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.59
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.79
Questions4.84
Diane K Martichuski 40 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.04
Connection4.62
Contribution4.83
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.16
Grading4.50
Reflection4.33
Respect4.47
Creativity4.21
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.51
Challenge4.21
Questions4.26
Cinnamon Bidwell 558 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
558 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.28
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.18
Collaboration4.32
Connection4.68
Contribution4.06
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.38
Grading4.48
Reflection4.53
Respect4.68
Creativity4.04
Feedback3.56
Interaction4.56
Challenge4.38
Questions4.58
Joshua Raphael Correll 3 reported responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Synthesis3.13
Collaboration2.83
Connection4.13
Contribution2.26
Inclusivity3.43
Reflection4.00
Interaction5.00
Pia Sellery 1 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.00
Inclusivity3.00
Reflection4.00
Interaction5.00
Kate Bell 3 reported responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Synthesis3.13
Collaboration2.83
Connection4.13
Contribution2.26
Inclusivity3.43
Reflection4.00
Interaction5.00
Kelly Kandra Hughes 781 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
781 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration4.13
Connection4.67
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.54
Grading4.53
Reflection4.53
Respect4.80
Creativity4.07
Feedback4.07
Interaction4.61
Challenge4.47
Questions4.66
Kiri Burrow 18 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.83
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.87
Collaboration4.54
Connection4.87
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.72
Grading4.81
Reflection4.87
Respect4.86
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.87
Questions4.85
Michael Louis Caruso 650 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
650 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.34
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.34
Collaboration3.57
Connection4.62
Contribution4.03
Discussion4.41
Inclusivity4.63
Grading4.51
Reflection4.46
Respect4.78
Creativity4.31
Feedback3.66
Interaction4.32
Challenge4.48
Questions4.44
Matthew Junker 561 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5
561 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.12
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.99
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.48
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.14
Grading4.24
Reflection4.22
Respect4.38
Creativity3.96
Feedback3.29
Interaction4.48
Challenge4.22
Questions4.24
James Ernest Crum 110 reported responses 3.94Eval / 5
Overall3.94 / 5
110 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.40
Connection4.40
Contribution3.10
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.30
Reflection4.20
Respect4.60
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.20
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.10
Questions4.40
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.