Course record PSCI

PSCI 3206

The Environment and Public Policy

University of Colorado Boulder

741 grades15 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score33/100
Below average

Professors 15 of 15

Nancy E Billica 461 grades · 1 term 3.39GPA
62.0% A
25.4% B
8.7% C
0.9% D
3.0% F

461 letter grades

Compare with the course
Billica vs. the course average
A +9.8
B −5.9
C −3.2
D −1.2
F +0.5

Difference in percentage points.

2.3% withdrew · 11 of 472 enrolled.

Michelle Elizabeth Benedum 70 grades · 1 term 3.28GPA
61.4% A
21.4% B
8.6% C
2.9% D
5.7% F

70 letter grades

Compare with the course
Benedum vs. the course average
A +9.2
B −9.9
C −3.3
D +0.8
F +3.2

Difference in percentage points.

1.4% withdrew · 1 of 71 enrolled.

Steven Jon Vanderheiden 133 grades · 1 term 3.12GPA
36.1% A
46.6% B
14.3% C
2.3% D
0.8% F

133 letter grades

Compare with the course
Vanderheiden vs. the course average
A −16.1
B +15.3
C +2.4
D +0.2
F −1.8

Difference in percentage points.

1.5% withdrew · 2 of 135 enrolled.

Adriana Lizette Molina Garzon 77 grades · 1 term 2.71GPA
13.0% A
49.4% B
29.9% C
7.8% D
0.0% F

77 letter grades

Compare with the course
Garzon vs. the course average
A −39.2
B +18.0
C +18.0
D +5.8
F −2.6

Difference in percentage points.

1.3% withdrew · 1 of 78 enrolled.

David Warshay 31 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5

31 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration3.40
Connection4.90
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.60
Grading3.70
Reflection4.60
Respect4.50
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.10
Questions4.50
Rachel Janie O'Neal 38 reported responses 3.76Eval / 5
Overall3.76 / 5

38 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology3.70
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration2.50
Connection4.70
Contribution3.90
Discussion3.60
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.40
Reflection4.30
Respect4.40
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.20
Interaction4.10
Challenge3.80
Questions3.90
Mateusz Michal Leszczynski 26 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

26 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration3.30
Connection4.90
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect4.70
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.30
Questions4.50
Kyle Lee Engels 27 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5

27 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.40
Connection4.80
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.60
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.40
Questions4.80
Dania Arayssi 76 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5

76 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.56
Technology4.54
Synthesis4.56
Collaboration3.89
Connection4.76
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.23
Inclusivity4.63
Grading4.29
Reflection4.54
Respect4.55
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.26
Interaction4.42
Challenge4.43
Questions4.56
Waverly B Eichhorst 25 reported responses 4.01Eval / 5
Overall4.01 / 5

25 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration2.50
Connection4.60
Contribution3.40
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.20
Reflection4.00
Respect4.30
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.30
Interaction3.40
Challenge4.20
Questions4.60
Samuel Kelcey Foredyce 19 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.50
Reflection4.70
Respect4.70
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Autumn Taylor 19 reported responses 3.51Eval / 5
Overall3.51 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology3.40
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration2.10
Connection4.50
Contribution3.10
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity4.20
Grading3.40
Reflection3.30
Respect4.30
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.60
Interaction3.20
Challenge3.50
Questions4.10
Joy Dertinger 34 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5

34 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.90
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.80
Reflection4.50
Respect4.40
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.20
Questions4.20
Zohar Naaman 34 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5

34 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.90
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.10
Reflection4.50
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.40
Questions4.60
Maxwell Cory Nathanson 11 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.90
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.90
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.70
Reflection5.00
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.50
Challenge5.00
Questions4.90
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.