Course record PSCI

PSCI 3163

American Foreign Policy

University of Colorado Boulder

576 grades14 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score24/100
Below average

Professors 14 of 14

Glen Krutz 37 grades · 1 term 3.50GPA
67.6% A
29.7% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
2.7% F

37 letter grades

Compare with the course
Krutz vs. the course average
A +18.3
B +0.2
C −12.3
D −5.6
F −0.6

Difference in percentage points.

7.5% withdrew · 3 of 40 enrolled.

Grant Cohen 117 grades · 1 term 3.44GPA
59.0% A
34.2% B
5.1% C
1.7% D
0.0% F

117 letter grades

Compare with the course
Cohen vs. the course average
A +9.7
B +4.7
C −7.2
D −3.8
F −3.3

Difference in percentage points.

1.7% withdrew · 2 of 119 enrolled.

Aysegul Aydin 232 grades · 1 term 3.14GPA
56.9% A
18.5% B
10.8% C
8.6% D
5.2% F

232 letter grades

Compare with the course
Aydin vs. the course average
A +7.6
B −11.0
C −1.6
D +3.1
F +1.9

Difference in percentage points.

4.1% withdrew · 10 of 242 enrolled.

David H. Bearce 149 grades · 1 term 3.01GPA
35.6% A
37.6% B
18.8% C
6.7% D
1.3% F

149 letter grades

Compare with the course
Bearce vs. the course average
A −13.7
B +8.1
C +6.5
D +1.2
F −2.0

Difference in percentage points.

5.7% withdrew · 9 of 158 enrolled.

Steven Matthew Beard 41 grades · 1 term 2.56GPA
12.2% A
48.8% B
29.3% C
0.0% D
9.8% F

41 letter grades

Compare with the course
Beard vs. the course average
A −37.1
B +19.3
C +16.9
D −5.6
F +6.5

Difference in percentage points.

6.8% withdrew · 3 of 44 enrolled.

Morgan Christine Nadeau 33 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5

33 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.30
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.10
Reflection4.10
Respect4.60
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.40
Questions4.40
Ken Stallman 48 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5

48 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology4.36
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration4.35
Connection5.00
Contribution4.72
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.72
Reflection4.72
Respect4.72
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.72
Questions4.72
Michael David Kanner 4 reported responses 4.94Eval / 5
Overall4.94 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Samantha Register 23 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.60
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.10
Reflection4.60
Respect4.60
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Andrew Mcleer 21 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration3.50
Connection5.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect4.70
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Alexandra Philippidis 22 reported responses 3.87Eval / 5
Overall3.87 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology3.80
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.80
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.60
Grading3.70
Reflection3.50
Respect4.40
Creativity3.50
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.30
Challenge3.90
Questions4.30
Zohar Naaman 20 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.60
Contribution3.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.20
Reflection4.00
Respect4.70
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.50
Interaction3.90
Challenge4.20
Questions4.40
Aine Katherine Santala 15 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.70
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Anna Kowalski 20 reported responses 3.67Eval / 5
Overall3.67 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology3.50
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration3.60
Connection3.80
Contribution3.40
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity3.70
Grading3.30
Reflection3.10
Respect4.40
Creativity3.40
Feedback3.70
Interaction3.70
Challenge3.80
Questions3.80
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.