Course record PSCI
PSCI 2223
Introduction to International Relations
University of Colorado Boulder
2,459 grades39 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score22/100
Below average
Aysegul Aydin 575 grades · 1 term 3.65GPA
575 letter grades
Compare with the course
Aydin vs. the course average
A
+38.5
B
−19.2
C
−13.3
D
−3.2
F
−2.7
Difference in percentage points.
2.4% withdrew · 14 of 589 enrolled.
Overall3.69 / 5
185 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.82
Technology3.34
Synthesis3.68
Collaboration3.45
Connection3.99
Contribution3.86
Discussion3.84
Inclusivity4.03
Grading3.24
Reflection3.70
Respect4.13
Creativity3.48
Feedback2.67
Interaction3.94
Challenge3.42
Questions3.67
Clara Park 631 grades · 1 term 2.95GPA
631 letter grades
Compare with the course
Park vs. the course average
A
−8.2
B
+10.9
C
−1.4
D
−2.6
F
+1.4
Difference in percentage points.
3.1% withdrew · 20 of 651 enrolled.
Jaroslav Tir 640 grades · 1 term 2.85GPA
640 letter grades
Compare with the course
Tir vs. the course average
A
−4.8
B
+0.1
C
+1.7
D
+1.9
F
+1.1
Difference in percentage points.
4.5% withdrew · 30 of 670 enrolled.
Overall4.13 / 5
329 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.29
Synthesis4.22
Collaboration3.25
Connection4.70
Contribution4.42
Discussion4.64
Inclusivity4.56
Grading4.15
Reflection4.38
Respect4.70
Creativity3.96
Feedback3.55
Interaction4.26
Challenge4.44
Questions4.45
Steve S Chan 250 grades · 1 term 2.59GPA
250 letter grades
Compare with the course
Chan vs. the course average
A
−21.8
B
+8.6
C
+10.1
D
+3.0
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
4.9% withdrew · 13 of 263 enrolled.
Svetoslav Derderyan 29 grades · 1 term 2.59GPA
29 letter grades
Compare with the course
Derderyan vs. the course average
A
−24.1
B
+17.9
C
−1.7
D
+2.3
F
+5.7
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 29 enrolled.
Overall4.60 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.85
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.30
Reflection4.65
Respect4.90
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.80
Questions4.65
Megan Shannon Deutmeyer 317 grades · 1 term 2.52GPA
317 letter grades
Compare with the course
Deutmeyer vs. the course average
A
−23.4
B
+4.0
C
+15.4
D
+4.5
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
3.4% withdrew · 11 of 328 enrolled.
Michael David Kanner 17 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.88GPA
17 letter grades · Limited sample
10.5% withdrew · 2 of 19 enrolled.
Overall3.34 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology3.10
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration1.30
Connection4.50
Contribution3.40
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.10
Reflection3.00
Respect2.70
Creativity3.70
Feedback4.00
Interaction2.00
Challenge3.10
Questions3.80
Kathryn Rose Schauer 23 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.35
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.55
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.55
Questions4.95
Kyle Lee Engels 16 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.60
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.85
Reflection4.85
Respect4.95
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.55
Questions4.85
Jefferson Garrett Seaberg 46 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5
46 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.61
Synthesis4.34
Collaboration4.29
Connection4.59
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity4.52
Grading4.49
Reflection4.61
Respect4.73
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.22
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.48
Questions4.72
Ganesh Gorti 94 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
94 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.46
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration4.22
Connection4.51
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.34
Reflection4.42
Respect4.82
Creativity4.17
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.38
Questions4.63
Ken Stallman 28 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.28
Synthesis4.39
Collaboration4.17
Connection4.78
Contribution4.28
Discussion4.28
Inclusivity4.78
Grading3.96
Reflection4.68
Respect4.17
Creativity4.55
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.28
Questions4.07
Kimberlee Chang 4 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology3.80
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration3.00
Connection4.80
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity2.80
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.80
Questions4.50
Bora Park 222 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
222 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.42
Technology4.29
Synthesis4.04
Collaboration4.04
Connection4.86
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity4.79
Grading4.25
Reflection4.62
Respect4.65
Creativity4.27
Feedback3.78
Interaction4.26
Challenge4.23
Questions4.34
Alberto Miguel Burgos-Rivera 123 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
123 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.52
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.75
Contribution4.51
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.43
Reflection4.69
Respect4.71
Creativity4.33
Feedback4.28
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.59
Questions4.67
Steven Van De Laarschot 46 reported responses 3.63Eval / 5
Overall3.63 / 5
46 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.78
Technology4.09
Synthesis3.61
Collaboration3.57
Connection3.92
Contribution4.10
Discussion3.84
Inclusivity3.57
Grading3.53
Reflection4.05
Respect3.70
Creativity3.52
Feedback3.53
Interaction4.09
Challenge3.44
Questions4.18
Morgan Christine Nadeau 19 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.35
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.60
Reflection4.35
Respect4.70
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.70
Questions4.65
Dania Arayssi 78 reported responses 3.74Eval / 5
Overall3.74 / 5
78 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology3.53
Synthesis3.41
Collaboration4.05
Connection3.90
Contribution3.99
Discussion3.86
Inclusivity3.85
Grading2.79
Reflection3.73
Respect4.17
Creativity3.02
Feedback2.90
Interaction4.19
Challenge3.49
Questions3.49
Sara Louise Hoose 22 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.29
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.54
Contribution4.56
Discussion4.58
Inclusivity4.32
Grading4.56
Reflection4.49
Respect4.76
Creativity4.29
Feedback4.31
Interaction4.47
Challenge4.28
Questions4.68
Samuel Kelcey Foredyce 30 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.56
Synthesis4.39
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.87
Contribution4.38
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.62
Reflection4.63
Respect4.86
Creativity3.94
Feedback4.24
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.82
Questions4.85
Brendan James Connell 3 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge5.00
Questions4.70
Megan Shannon 365 reported responses 3.80Eval / 5
Overall3.80 / 5
365 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.12
Technology3.74
Synthesis3.88
Collaboration3.38
Connection4.35
Contribution3.60
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity4.38
Grading3.55
Reflection3.92
Respect4.38
Creativity3.63
Feedback3.02
Interaction4.03
Challenge3.85
Questions4.02
Kai Peterson 41 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.76
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.99
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.97
Grading4.77
Reflection4.95
Respect4.98
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.89
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.75
Questions4.89
Chris Jackson 27 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.93
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.95
Contribution4.96
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.96
Grading4.94
Reflection4.95
Respect4.96
Creativity4.93
Feedback4.92
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.94
Questions4.96
Anna Kowalski 100 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
100 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.59
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.74
Connection4.79
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.56
Reflection4.66
Respect4.77
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.56
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.68
Questions4.75
Danielle Anderson 78 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
78 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.49
Synthesis4.42
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.45
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.76
Inclusivity4.64
Grading4.33
Reflection4.59
Respect4.80
Creativity4.28
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.63
Questions4.67
Alexandra Philippidis 86 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
86 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.31
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.64
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity4.59
Grading4.49
Reflection4.46
Respect4.61
Creativity4.32
Feedback4.42
Interaction4.64
Challenge4.49
Questions4.68
Poushali Mohanta 16 reported responses 3.91Eval / 5
Overall3.91 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.70
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity4.05
Grading3.25
Reflection3.80
Respect4.55
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.55
Interaction4.75
Challenge3.90
Questions4.30
Zeynep Oguz 115 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
115 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.54
Technology4.41
Synthesis4.36
Collaboration4.81
Connection4.73
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.22
Reflection4.61
Respect4.75
Creativity4.31
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.43
Questions4.54
Ansgarius Manek 36 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.06
Synthesis3.86
Collaboration4.39
Connection4.16
Contribution4.32
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.13
Grading3.89
Reflection4.01
Respect4.58
Creativity3.45
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.73
Challenge3.87
Questions4.35
Alex Newhouse 44 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.65
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.65
Reflection4.75
Respect4.80
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.50
Questions4.70
Sam Moya 4 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology3.46
Synthesis4.16
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.93
Grading4.84
Reflection5.00
Respect4.93
Creativity4.84
Feedback4.07
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.16
Questions4.16
Rachel Janie O'Neal 40 reported responses 3.84Eval / 5
Overall3.84 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.21
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.62
Connection4.26
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.39
Inclusivity4.38
Grading3.73
Reflection4.05
Respect4.38
Creativity3.86
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.54
Challenge4.00
Questions4.29
Isha Banerjee 77 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
77 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.42
Collaboration4.69
Connection4.82
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.31
Reflection4.74
Respect4.79
Creativity4.11
Feedback4.41
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.73
Questions4.71
Donald Caviness 51 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
51 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.74
Contribution4.59
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.54
Grading4.05
Reflection4.59
Respect4.75
Creativity4.23
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.71
Challenge4.42
Questions4.53
Furkan Sumbul 11 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.55
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.45
Reflection4.85
Respect4.55
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.40
Questions4.35
Gato James 16 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.24
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration3.45
Connection4.65
Contribution4.22
Discussion4.24
Inclusivity4.84
Grading4.12
Reflection4.50
Respect4.78
Creativity3.33
Feedback3.93
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.19
Questions4.62
Taufiq E Faruque 37 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.29
Technology4.38
Synthesis4.04
Collaboration3.15
Connection4.56
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity4.47
Grading4.50
Reflection4.22
Respect4.71
Creativity3.80
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.19
Challenge4.15
Questions4.67
Inbo Park 10 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.35
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.10
Grading3.50
Reflection4.15
Respect4.80
Creativity3.70
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.35
Questions4.80
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.