Course record PSCI
PSCI 2004
Survey of Western Political Thought
University of Colorado Boulder
1,583 grades22 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score18/100
Needs work
Tamar Malloy 423 grades · 1 term 2.78GPA
423 letter grades
Compare with the course
Malloy vs. the course average
A
+8.7
B
−6.6
C
−5.2
D
−0.5
F
+3.6
Difference in percentage points.
4.9% withdrew · 22 of 445 enrolled.
Overall4.03 / 5
449 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology3.34
Synthesis4.17
Collaboration3.54
Connection3.99
Contribution3.84
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity4.29
Grading4.11
Reflection4.37
Respect4.58
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.48
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.37
Questions4.46
Michaele L. Ferguson 556 grades · 1 term 2.76GPA
556 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ferguson vs. the course average
A
+0.7
B
+0.3
C
+1.1
D
−0.8
F
−1.4
Difference in percentage points.
4.8% withdrew · 28 of 584 enrolled.
Overall3.82 / 5
215 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology3.61
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration3.68
Connection4.39
Contribution3.89
Discussion4.19
Inclusivity4.49
Grading3.59
Reflection4.19
Respect4.39
Creativity4.08
Feedback3.38
Interaction4.29
Challenge4.28
Questions4.29
Steven Jon Vanderheiden 604 grades · 1 term 2.61GPA
604 letter grades
Compare with the course
Vanderheiden vs. the course average
A
−6.8
B
+4.3
C
+2.7
D
+1.1
F
−1.3
Difference in percentage points.
4.1% withdrew · 26 of 630 enrolled.
Overall3.83 / 5
279 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.09
Technology3.65
Synthesis3.69
Collaboration2.65
Connection3.65
Contribution3.25
Discussion3.57
Inclusivity4.16
Grading3.37
Reflection3.85
Respect4.40
Creativity3.84
Feedback2.93
Interaction3.86
Challenge3.78
Questions3.89
Jeffrey Chadwick 129 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5
129 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.56
Technology4.42
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.56
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.78
Grading3.96
Reflection4.50
Respect4.66
Creativity4.57
Feedback3.98
Interaction4.71
Challenge4.57
Questions4.21
Zoe Rebecca Moss 163 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
163 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.56
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.41
Collaboration4.68
Connection4.48
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.51
Grading4.73
Reflection4.67
Respect4.81
Creativity4.41
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.53
Questions4.90
Isaac Sours 93 reported responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5
93 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.41
Technology4.08
Synthesis4.18
Collaboration4.29
Connection4.30
Contribution4.01
Discussion4.37
Inclusivity4.47
Grading3.54
Reflection4.34
Respect4.42
Creativity3.97
Feedback3.63
Interaction4.24
Challenge4.37
Questions4.36
Allan Tellis 109 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
109 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.26
Technology4.04
Synthesis4.03
Collaboration3.99
Connection4.12
Contribution4.01
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.14
Grading4.11
Reflection4.12
Respect4.22
Creativity3.86
Feedback3.87
Interaction4.05
Challenge4.18
Questions4.36
Owen Fite 81 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
81 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.47
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration4.53
Connection4.46
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.54
Grading4.43
Reflection4.70
Respect4.85
Creativity4.02
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.56
Questions4.76
Mohammad Rezwanul Haque Masud 105 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
105 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration4.61
Connection4.79
Contribution4.72
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.85
Reflection4.84
Respect4.85
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.89
Questions4.80
Kimberly Elaine Killen 12 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.65
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.45
Reflection4.50
Respect4.85
Creativity3.80
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Sarah Elizabeth Brown 132 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
132 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.97
Technology4.96
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.92
Connection4.92
Contribution4.92
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.64
Reflection4.97
Respect4.93
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.86
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.82
Matthew Thomas Harvey 21 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.55
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.55
Reflection4.60
Respect4.75
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Danielle Anderson 43 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.48
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration3.74
Connection4.49
Contribution4.59
Discussion4.36
Inclusivity4.83
Grading4.16
Reflection4.53
Respect4.44
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.29
Interaction4.12
Challenge4.77
Questions4.51
Scott Benjamin Ritner 15 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.41
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.79
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.05
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.42
Inclusivity4.23
Grading4.59
Reflection4.59
Respect4.42
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.61
Questions4.24
Autumn Taylor 30 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.34
Synthesis4.74
Collaboration4.38
Connection4.80
Contribution4.52
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.77
Reflection4.73
Respect4.63
Creativity4.69
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.73
Questions4.78
Kabin Jo 86 reported responses 3.80Eval / 5
Overall3.80 / 5
86 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.94
Technology3.73
Synthesis3.78
Collaboration4.39
Connection3.69
Contribution4.36
Discussion4.38
Inclusivity4.11
Grading3.21
Reflection4.19
Respect4.60
Creativity3.32
Feedback3.24
Interaction4.66
Challenge3.72
Questions3.72
Case Osborn 34 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.10
Connection3.80
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.05
Grading4.15
Reflection4.35
Respect4.55
Creativity3.65
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.40
Questions4.45
Kyra Rossier 58 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
58 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.05
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.53
Connection4.36
Contribution4.61
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity4.69
Grading4.04
Reflection4.66
Respect4.62
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.18
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.76
Questions4.50
Kristen Anna 25 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology3.95
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.50
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.65
Reflection4.55
Respect4.55
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.40
Questions4.65
Alex Newhouse 33 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.65
Reflection4.80
Respect4.75
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Stacey Bui 33 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.25
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.41
Reflection4.73
Respect4.71
Creativity4.46
Feedback4.46
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.74
Questions4.67
Kamazhay Bermagambetova 38 reported responses 3.60Eval / 5
Overall3.60 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology3.51
Synthesis3.72
Collaboration4.12
Connection3.44
Contribution3.86
Discussion4.22
Inclusivity3.93
Grading3.13
Reflection3.68
Respect3.93
Creativity3.52
Feedback3.14
Interaction3.87
Challenge3.41
Questions3.68
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.