Course record PSCI
PSCI 1101
Introduction to American Politics
University of Colorado Boulder
3,092 grades51 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score24/100
Below average
Vanessa Anne Baird 249 grades · 1 term 3.32GPA
249 letter grades
Compare with the course
Baird vs. the course average
A
+18.1
B
−16.0
C
−2.0
D
−1.9
F
+1.9
Difference in percentage points.
5.7% withdrew · 15 of 264 enrolled.
Overall3.45 / 5
409 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.77
Technology3.17
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration3.03
Connection3.70
Contribution3.10
Discussion3.37
Inclusivity3.80
Grading3.23
Reflection3.47
Respect3.87
Creativity3.57
Feedback3.03
Interaction3.70
Challenge3.67
Questions3.70
Srinivas C Parinandi 611 grades · 1 term 3.25GPA
611 letter grades
Compare with the course
Parinandi vs. the course average
A
+6.2
B
−0.4
C
−3.6
D
−0.2
F
−2.0
Difference in percentage points.
3.2% withdrew · 20 of 631 enrolled.
Overall4.25 / 5
375 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.37
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration3.76
Connection4.74
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.17
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.06
Reflection4.34
Respect4.62
Creativity4.28
Feedback3.76
Interaction3.99
Challenge4.35
Questions4.51
Janet Lynn Donavan 1,102 grades · 1 term 3.16GPA
1,102 letter grades
Compare with the course
Donavan vs. the course average
A
+1.8
B
+0.4
C
−1.1
D
−0.4
F
−0.8
Difference in percentage points.
3.4% withdrew · 39 of 1,141 enrolled.
Overall4.16 / 5
601 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.31
Synthesis4.11
Collaboration3.23
Connection4.80
Contribution3.72
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.29
Reflection4.11
Respect4.70
Creativity4.19
Feedback3.79
Interaction4.04
Challenge4.21
Questions4.22
John David Griffin 751 grades · 1 term 2.99GPA
751 letter grades
Compare with the course
Griffin vs. the course average
A
−5.6
B
+2.5
C
+1.9
D
+1.1
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
4.1% withdrew · 32 of 783 enrolled.
Overall4.23 / 5
230 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.49
Technology4.24
Synthesis4.22
Collaboration3.42
Connection4.80
Contribution3.92
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.51
Grading4.47
Reflection4.35
Respect4.73
Creativity3.95
Feedback3.63
Interaction4.42
Challenge4.36
Questions4.36
Anand Edward Sokhey 379 grades · 1 term 2.72GPA
379 letter grades
Compare with the course
Sokhey vs. the course average
A
−16.1
B
+5.0
C
+6.4
D
+0.6
F
+4.2
Difference in percentage points.
3.8% withdrew · 15 of 394 enrolled.
Overall4.01 / 5
275 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration2.90
Connection4.60
Contribution3.40
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.10
Reflection4.20
Respect4.70
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.20
Questions4.30
Madeline Mary Mader 67 reported responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5
67 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.81
Technology4.92
Synthesis4.81
Collaboration3.56
Connection4.86
Contribution4.82
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.91
Grading3.99
Reflection4.88
Respect4.95
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.31
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.43
Questions4.90
Ian Thomas Shapiro 29 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.80
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.45
Reflection4.55
Respect4.85
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.65
Andrew Trimble 56 reported responses 3.85Eval / 5
Overall3.85 / 5
56 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.68
Technology3.93
Synthesis3.73
Collaboration3.15
Connection4.06
Contribution3.82
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.12
Grading3.37
Reflection3.76
Respect4.80
Creativity3.43
Feedback3.11
Interaction4.21
Challenge3.86
Questions4.19
Samantha Register 104 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
104 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration3.40
Connection4.69
Contribution4.69
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.59
Grading4.39
Reflection4.49
Respect4.60
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.29
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.39
Questions4.69
Spencer Bradley 30 reported responses 3.68Eval / 5
Overall3.68 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology3.95
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration2.95
Connection4.30
Contribution3.65
Discussion4.05
Inclusivity4.35
Grading3.60
Reflection4.05
Respect4.25
Creativity3.35
Feedback3.10
Interaction3.55
Challenge3.80
Questions3.95
Tyler Patrick Garrett 111 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
111 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.72
Connection4.77
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.73
Reflection4.60
Respect4.94
Creativity4.27
Feedback4.26
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.49
Questions4.75
Sinan Nadarevic 90 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
90 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.47
Synthesis4.16
Collaboration4.21
Connection4.23
Contribution4.16
Discussion4.41
Inclusivity4.13
Grading4.55
Reflection4.23
Respect4.49
Creativity4.07
Feedback4.16
Interaction4.49
Challenge4.39
Questions4.52
Christopher St Hilaire Jorde 38 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration3.81
Connection4.87
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.72
Grading4.66
Reflection4.71
Respect4.83
Creativity4.74
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.69
Questions4.76
Owen Fite 28 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.70
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.35
Reflection4.45
Respect4.65
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.55
Questions4.60
Alexander Lee Jensen 59 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5
59 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.18
Collaboration3.44
Connection4.67
Contribution3.97
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.50
Reflection4.61
Respect4.74
Creativity3.76
Feedback4.29
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.36
Questions4.62
Courtney J Johnson 28 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.80
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.45
Questions4.90
Morgan Christine Nadeau 19 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.85
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.70
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Marija Sajekaite 14 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.55
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.65
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.30
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.15
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.10
Questions4.70
Michael Montgomery Byrd 88 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
88 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.34
Technology4.38
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration4.03
Connection4.59
Contribution4.39
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.72
Grading4.53
Reflection4.40
Respect4.82
Creativity3.95
Feedback4.22
Interaction4.44
Challenge4.38
Questions4.76
Pavel Bacovsky 13 reported responses 4.04Eval / 5
Overall4.04 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.10
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.20
Reflection3.90
Respect4.10
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.00
Questions4.30
Alex Jensen 25 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.90
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.65
Reflection4.75
Respect4.90
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.65
Questions4.65
Allan Tellis 61 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
61 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.56
Collaboration4.66
Connection4.79
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.89
Inclusivity4.79
Grading4.65
Reflection4.79
Respect4.87
Creativity4.37
Feedback4.36
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.71
Questions4.80
Davis Hughes 16 reported responses 3.77Eval / 5
Overall3.77 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology3.35
Synthesis3.15
Collaboration3.90
Connection3.65
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.05
Grading3.80
Reflection4.05
Respect4.25
Creativity3.20
Feedback3.45
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.45
Questions4.15
Katie Sevin 236 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
236 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.36
Technology4.47
Synthesis4.12
Collaboration3.56
Connection4.52
Contribution3.92
Discussion4.36
Inclusivity4.54
Grading4.42
Reflection4.35
Respect4.54
Creativity4.21
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.34
Challenge4.41
Questions4.55
Katie Marie Glenn 98 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
98 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.56
Technology4.61
Synthesis4.44
Collaboration4.37
Connection4.72
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.66
Inclusivity4.68
Grading4.65
Reflection4.69
Respect4.77
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.66
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.54
Questions4.68
Julie Marie Shepherd 2 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.50
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.00
Joey Pedersen 34 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.44
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration4.69
Connection4.46
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity4.72
Grading4.46
Reflection4.59
Respect4.76
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.62
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.55
Questions4.85
Mateusz Michal Leszczynski 13 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.65
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.45
Reflection4.60
Respect4.75
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.35
Questions4.65
Case Osborn 28 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.85
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect4.85
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.55
Questions4.80
Annie Martin 30 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.75
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.30
Reflection4.75
Respect4.80
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.35
Questions4.70
Dane Burgos 41 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.55
Reflection4.70
Respect4.85
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Stone Neilon 42 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.90
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.80
Reflection4.90
Respect4.85
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.60
Questions4.85
Grayson Moore 45 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
45 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.25
Connection4.60
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.60
Reflection4.65
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.50
Questions4.85
Damon Charles Roberts 6 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.50
Reflection4.00
Respect4.30
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Ken Stallman 15 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.86
Synthesis4.42
Collaboration4.23
Connection4.84
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.59
Reflection4.74
Respect4.78
Creativity4.46
Feedback3.89
Interaction4.64
Challenge4.86
Questions4.64
Poushali Mohanta 168 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5
168 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.28
Technology4.27
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.83
Connection4.40
Contribution3.88
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.17
Reflection4.12
Respect4.47
Creativity4.16
Feedback4.07
Interaction4.36
Challenge4.05
Questions4.26
Eman Bensreiti 184 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5
184 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.34
Synthesis4.21
Collaboration3.87
Connection4.40
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.48
Grading4.30
Reflection4.24
Respect4.57
Creativity4.16
Feedback3.98
Interaction4.34
Challenge4.26
Questions4.32
Ansgarius Manek 27 reported responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.54
Technology4.39
Synthesis4.42
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.75
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.56
Inclusivity4.63
Grading4.05
Reflection4.63
Respect4.69
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.56
Challenge4.28
Questions4.52
Patrick Ochoa 32 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.35
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.40
Reflection4.30
Respect4.65
Creativity3.70
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.35
Questions4.70
Cayleb Stives 149 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
149 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.71
Synthesis4.34
Collaboration3.94
Connection4.68
Contribution4.18
Discussion4.41
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.28
Reflection4.58
Respect4.61
Creativity4.46
Feedback4.34
Interaction4.43
Challenge4.34
Questions4.55
Samuel Kelcey Foredyce 31 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.90
Reflection4.55
Respect4.70
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.65
Questions4.80
Benjamin Vandreew 38 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.51
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.72
Connection4.75
Contribution4.46
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.58
Grading4.59
Reflection4.56
Respect4.90
Creativity4.44
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.56
Questions4.86
Katie Henze 124 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5
124 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.20
Connection4.80
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.20
Respect4.50
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.30
Questions4.40
Alexandra Victoria Palmer 19 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.66
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.64
Collaboration4.48
Connection4.76
Contribution4.81
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.91
Grading4.59
Reflection4.67
Respect4.86
Creativity4.64
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.61
Challenge4.72
Questions4.76
Zeynep Oguz 38 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.65
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.50
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.05
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.60
Jacob Brooks 19 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.49
Collaboration4.14
Connection4.63
Contribution3.98
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.48
Reflection4.28
Respect4.85
Creativity4.06
Feedback4.07
Interaction4.34
Challenge4.75
Questions4.53
Donald Caviness 28 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.45
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.40
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.60
Questions4.50
Claudette Medina 33 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.51
Technology4.32
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.62
Connection4.66
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.58
Inclusivity4.67
Grading3.99
Reflection4.39
Respect4.53
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.83
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.15
Questions4.37
Marayna Martinez 65 reported responses 4.01Eval / 5
Overall4.01 / 5
65 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.30
Connection4.50
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.10
Reflection4.00
Respect4.70
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.20
Questions4.10
Katherine Louise Sevin 10 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.80
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.70
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.20
Reflection4.35
Respect4.70
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.30
Questions4.85
Alba Ramos Escobar 14 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.70
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.20
Reflection4.25
Respect4.80
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.20
Questions4.50
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.