Course record PMUS
PMUS 1205
Keyboard-Musicianship 2
University of Colorado Boulder
131 grades17 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score60/100
Strong
Mario L Barbosa 30 grades · 1 term 3.66GPA
30 letter grades
Compare with the course
Barbosa vs. the course average
A
−3.3
B
+6.3
C
−1.5
D
same
F
−1.5
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 30 enrolled.
Overall3.65 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.83
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.71
Collaboration3.33
Connection3.58
Contribution3.50
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity2.81
Grading2.94
Reflection3.44
Respect4.38
Creativity3.83
Feedback3.46
Interaction4.06
Challenge3.67
Questions4.38
Yukino Miyake 10 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.90GPA
10 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 10 enrolled.
Overall4.84 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.10
Connection5.00
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.80
Fernanda Nieto-Pulido 10 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.74GPA
10 letter grades · Limited sample
9.1% withdrew · 1 of 11 enrolled.
Angela Schmitt 23 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.69GPA
23 letter grades · Limited sample
4.2% withdrew · 1 of 24 enrolled.
Bryan Chung Chieh Chuan 24 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.68GPA
24 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 24 enrolled.
Er-Hsuan Li 11 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.55GPA
11 letter grades · Limited sample
8.3% withdrew · 1 of 12 enrolled.
Overall4.46 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration3.15
Connection3.20
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.90
Reflection4.35
Respect4.70
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
James Hunter Morris 11 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.34GPA
11 letter grades · Limited sample
8.3% withdrew · 1 of 12 enrolled.
Overall4.46 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.25
Reflection4.25
Respect4.75
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.85
Questions4.75
Carl Jackson Feaster 12 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.29GPA
12 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 12 enrolled.
Overall4.24 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology4.05
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.10
Connection3.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.50
Reflection3.65
Respect4.90
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.15
Questions4.40
Joel David Reid 7 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.65
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.90
Reflection4.75
Respect5.00
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.65
Questions4.60
Anastasiia Pavlenko 11 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.35
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.65
Reflection4.50
Respect4.60
Creativity3.95
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.75
Questions4.85
Maria Fernanda Nieto Pulido 16 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.70
Technology4.25
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration3.85
Connection3.55
Contribution3.75
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.20
Reflection4.30
Respect4.60
Creativity3.95
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.35
Questions4.50
Angelique Scully 6 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.75
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.85
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Kimia Peykarzadeh 5 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.50
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.00
Reflection4.50
Respect4.60
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.60
Questions4.40
Ethan Stahl 4 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.50
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.75
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.75
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.75
Questions4.75
Gregory Worthley 35 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.71
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.06
Connection4.68
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.07
Grading4.87
Reflection4.59
Respect4.99
Creativity4.71
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.96
Questions4.97
Chirapa Wungkaom 21 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.08
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.68
Connection3.65
Contribution4.04
Discussion4.16
Inclusivity3.09
Grading4.27
Reflection4.23
Respect5.00
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.54
Questions4.81
Olivia Nicole Brewer 4 reported responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.85
Synthesis2.85
Collaboration3.65
Connection3.50
Contribution2.85
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.15
Reflection4.15
Respect4.00
Creativity3.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.