Course record PHYS
PHYS 2210
Classical Mechanics and Mathematical Methods 1
University of Colorado Boulder
874 grades14 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score25/100
Below average
Andreas Becker 123 grades · 1 term 3.06GPA
123 letter grades
Compare with the course
Becker vs. the course average
A
+4.4
B
−5.7
C
+3.3
D
+2.7
F
−4.7
Difference in percentage points.
7.5% withdrew · 10 of 133 enrolled.
Overall4.84 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.60
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.80
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Ethan Neil 269 grades · 1 term 3.01GPA
269 letter grades
Compare with the course
Neil vs. the course average
A
−0.7
B
+4.4
C
−1.4
D
−2.7
F
+0.5
Difference in percentage points.
8.2% withdrew · 24 of 293 enrolled.
Overall4.53 / 5
91 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.52
Synthesis4.51
Collaboration4.68
Connection4.50
Contribution4.18
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity3.67
Grading4.33
Reflection4.43
Respect4.81
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.62
Questions4.34
Meredith D Betterton 167 grades · 1 term 3.00GPA
167 letter grades
Compare with the course
Betterton vs. the course average
A
−2.5
B
+6.2
C
−4.5
D
+0.8
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
5.6% withdrew · 10 of 177 enrolled.
Overall4.23 / 5
99 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.21
Synthesis4.19
Collaboration4.68
Connection4.11
Contribution3.98
Discussion4.29
Inclusivity3.77
Grading3.53
Reflection4.29
Respect4.57
Creativity3.73
Feedback3.33
Interaction4.31
Challenge4.21
Questions4.01
Dennis Vadimovich Perepelitsa 127 grades · 1 term 2.98GPA
127 letter grades
Compare with the course
Perepelitsa vs. the course average
A
+2.9
B
−1.0
C
−2.9
D
−2.2
F
+3.2
Difference in percentage points.
4.5% withdrew · 6 of 133 enrolled.
Overall4.51 / 5
66 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.65
Connection4.40
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.50
Reflection4.65
Respect4.95
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.75
Questions4.80
Michael A Dubson 75 grades · 1 term 2.84GPA
75 letter grades
Compare with the course
Dubson vs. the course average
A
+2.0
B
−9.6
C
+3.0
D
+3.4
F
+1.2
Difference in percentage points.
6.3% withdrew · 5 of 80 enrolled.
Overall4.41 / 5
46 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.10
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.30
Reflection4.60
Respect4.40
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Keith A Ulmer 59 grades · 1 term 2.82GPA
59 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ulmer vs. the course average
A
−4.7
B
−2.1
C
+3.3
D
+3.9
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
3.3% withdrew · 2 of 61 enrolled.
Overall4.71 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.70
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.90
Questions4.70
Steven J Pollock 54 grades · 1 term 2.81GPA
54 letter grades
Compare with the course
Pollock vs. the course average
A
−3.1
B
−10.5
C
+12.6
D
+1.0
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
6.9% withdrew · 4 of 58 enrolled.
Aaron Sokolik 1 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Reflection5.00
Interaction5.00
Trevor Geerdts 1 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Reflection5.00
Interaction5.00
Roman Gabriel Marcarelli 1 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Reflection5.00
Interaction5.00
Sara Moore 1 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Reflection5.00
Interaction5.00
Christopher Akers 28 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.30
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.40
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.50
Michael Andrew Calkins 40 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.20
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.10
Reflection4.30
Respect4.40
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.40
Questions4.50
Alysia Diane Marino 28 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.30
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.20
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.60
Questions4.50
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.