Course record PHYS

PHYS 2010

General Physics 1

University of Colorado Boulder

2,318 grades76 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score22/100
Below average

Professors 76 of 76

Cindy Anne Regal 237 grades · 1 term 2.76GPA
29.1% A
29.1% B
35.0% C
3.4% D
3.4% F

237 letter grades

Compare with the course
Regal vs. the course average
A +5.9
B −3.1
C +0.8
D −2.9
F −0.7

Difference in percentage points.

3.7% withdrew · 9 of 246 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Loren Evan Hough 166 grades · 1 term 2.74GPA
24.7% A
34.3% B
38.0% C
1.8% D
1.2% F

166 letter grades

Compare with the course
Hough vs. the course average
A +1.4
B +2.2
C +3.7
D −4.4
F −2.9

Difference in percentage points.

4.6% withdrew · 8 of 174 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Mihaly Horanyi 173 grades · 1 term 2.70GPA
24.3% A
37.0% B
28.3% C
6.9% D
3.5% F

173 letter grades

Compare with the course
Horanyi vs. the course average
A +1.0
B +4.8
C −5.9
D +0.7
F −0.6

Difference in percentage points.

8.5% withdrew · 16 of 189 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Colin G West 337 grades · 1 term 2.64GPA
20.8% A
40.1% B
25.5% C
11.9% D
1.8% F

337 letter grades

Compare with the course
West vs. the course average
A −2.5
B +7.9
C −8.7
D +5.6
F −2.3

Difference in percentage points.

2.9% withdrew · 10 of 347 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Eleanor R Hodby 1,254 grades · 1 term 2.55GPA
22.6% A
29.6% B
36.8% C
5.9% D
5.0% F

1,254 letter grades

Compare with the course
Hodby vs. the course average
A −0.6
B −2.6
C +2.6
D −0.4
F +0.9

Difference in percentage points.

7.3% withdrew · 99 of 1,353 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Kevin M Stenson 151 grades · 1 term 2.55GPA
21.9% A
33.1% B
33.1% C
5.3% D
6.6% F

151 letter grades

Compare with the course
Stenson vs. the course average
A −1.4
B +0.9
C −1.1
D −1.0
F +2.5

Difference in percentage points.

9.6% withdrew · 16 of 167 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Alyx Patterson 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Marcel Mazur 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Sarang Yeola 22 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.05
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.25
Grading4.60
Reflection4.30
Respect4.85
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.45
Questions4.55
Open full professor record
Kenneth Jon Higginbotham 42 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

42 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.17
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.36
Grading4.23
Reflection4.65
Respect4.90
Creativity4.76
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.81
Questions4.82
Open full professor record
Shunjie Han 19 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.15
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.55
Reflection4.55
Respect4.90
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.45
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.60
Questions4.85
Open full professor record
Mengyu Wu 20 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.70
Contribution4.40
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.35
Reflection4.05
Respect4.20
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.55
Challenge3.95
Questions4.45
Open full professor record
Sina G Lewis 19 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.05
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.45
Reflection4.75
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.45
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Ryan Yik Wah Lau 43 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5

43 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.55
Contribution3.75
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.50
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Wei Mao 17 reported responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.45
Collaboration4.30
Connection3.35
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity2.40
Grading4.00
Reflection4.20
Respect4.45
Creativity4.05
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.15
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Sankalp Gaur 53 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

53 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.81
Technology4.59
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.67
Contribution4.66
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity3.76
Grading4.78
Reflection4.79
Respect4.85
Creativity4.68
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.78
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Anna Hasenfratz 23 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.05
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.30
Reflection4.70
Respect4.85
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.55
Questions4.85
Open full professor record
John C Zaris 13 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.35
Contribution4.95
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.65
Reflection4.90
Respect4.95
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.95
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.85
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Roman Gabriel Marcarelli 32 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

32 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.49
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.55
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.13
Grading4.69
Reflection4.55
Respect4.91
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.85
Questions4.91
Open full professor record
Zhijing Niu 2 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Collaboration2.00
Connection5.00
Contribution2.00
Discussion4.50
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction3.50
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Yan Jin 7 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.90
Contribution4.70
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.40
Reflection4.70
Respect4.50
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.00
Interaction3.40
Challenge4.70
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Zheng Luo 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Jose Hiram Pagan Jr 18 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.65
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.60
Reflection4.65
Respect4.60
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.80
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Bade Sayki 14 reported responses 4.93Eval / 5
Overall4.93 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.75
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading5.00
Reflection4.95
Respect5.00
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.95
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Aaron Sokolik 34 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5

34 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology3.60
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.33
Contribution4.51
Discussion3.93
Inclusivity4.27
Grading3.66
Reflection4.05
Respect4.55
Creativity3.52
Feedback3.46
Interaction4.58
Challenge3.79
Questions3.88
Open full professor record
Yilun Song 13 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.70
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.20
Reflection4.60
Respect4.50
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.55
Questions4.15
Open full professor record
Noah Lordi 18 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.60
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.85
Reflection4.65
Respect4.95
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
Carter Patterson 15 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.35
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.65
Grading4.35
Reflection4.55
Respect4.95
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.35
Questions4.65
Open full professor record
Daniel Glenn Steckhahn 12 reported responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.65
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.10
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.25
Grading3.90
Reflection3.90
Respect4.40
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.90
Questions4.10
Open full professor record
Justin Nicoski 13 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.55
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.90
Grading3.85
Reflection4.85
Respect4.85
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.35
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Yifei Ni 10 reported responses 3.86Eval / 5
Overall3.86 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.55
Technology3.45
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.30
Contribution3.70
Discussion3.85
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.40
Reflection3.65
Respect4.10
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.55
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.85
Questions4.20
Open full professor record
Cai E. Cash 72 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5

72 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.61
Technology4.39
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.78
Contribution4.74
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.21
Grading4.79
Reflection4.78
Respect4.93
Creativity4.68
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.90
Questions4.84
Open full professor record
Luke Zhou 5 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.20
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.80
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.60
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Sara Moore 18 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.45
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.35
Grading4.45
Reflection4.45
Respect4.85
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.65
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Braden Larsen 13 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.20
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.25
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.85
Questions4.45
Open full professor record
Daphne Blumin 21 reported responses 3.79Eval / 5
Overall3.79 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology3.70
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.35
Connection3.75
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity3.25
Grading3.60
Reflection3.80
Respect4.50
Creativity3.80
Feedback2.80
Interaction4.60
Challenge3.40
Questions3.45
Open full professor record
Trevor Geerdts 11 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.55
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.65
Reflection4.75
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Jacob Monahan 110 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5

110 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.84
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.69
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.74
Contribution4.82
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.14
Grading4.74
Reflection4.86
Respect4.86
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.89
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.91
Questions4.95
Open full professor record
Seth Grable 45 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5

45 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.60
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.75
Reflection4.75
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.75
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Renee Michelle Gurganus 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Reflection5.00
Interaction5.00
Open full professor record
Nikolay Yegovtsev 35 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5

35 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.63
Connection4.33
Contribution4.18
Discussion4.43
Inclusivity4.18
Grading4.25
Reflection4.35
Respect4.75
Creativity4.17
Feedback3.98
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.48
Questions4.38
Open full professor record
Daniel Ryan Bolton 21 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.91
Technology4.91
Synthesis4.84
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.71
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.74
Grading4.91
Reflection4.86
Respect4.94
Creativity4.86
Feedback4.86
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.62
Questions4.97
Open full professor record
Danny Wendt 1 reported responses 3.15Eval / 5
Overall3.15 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology1.00
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion3.00
Inclusivity1.00
Grading3.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity2.00
Feedback2.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge2.00
Questions4.00
Open full professor record
Kristopher Bunker 4 reported responses 3.50Eval / 5
Overall3.50 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.75
Synthesis3.25
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.50
Contribution2.75
Inclusivity1.67
Reflection4.00
Interaction4.25
Open full professor record
Michael Joseph Schefferstein 5 reported responses 3.51Eval / 5
Overall3.51 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence1.95
Synthesis2.68
Collaboration3.45
Connection3.73
Contribution2.41
Inclusivity2.37
Reflection4.00
Interaction4.59
Open full professor record
Cade Pair 66 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

66 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.59
Contribution4.66
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.01
Grading4.60
Reflection4.67
Respect4.75
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.82
Questions4.82
Open full professor record
Jake Sitison 9 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.85
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.10
Reflection4.70
Respect4.85
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.55
Questions4.55
Open full professor record
Spencer Jordan Hall 38 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5

38 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.64
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.89
Connection4.30
Contribution4.59
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.38
Grading4.51
Reflection4.52
Respect4.95
Creativity4.68
Feedback4.61
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.74
Questions4.83
Open full professor record
Tin Nghia Nguyen 32 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

32 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.39
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.40
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity3.89
Grading4.42
Reflection4.53
Respect4.61
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.71
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Matteo Wilczak 18 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.85
Reflection4.90
Respect4.85
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.95
Questions4.95
Open full professor record
Phillip Glenn Morgan 9 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.80
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.85
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.40
Reflection4.50
Respect4.10
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.75
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Gewei Chen 2 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Grading4.00
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.00
Open full professor record
Keita Richardson 14 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.45
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.60
Reflection4.65
Respect4.50
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.55
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Xianliang Lu 7 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology3.85
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.85
Connection3.90
Contribution4.40
Discussion3.60
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.95
Reflection4.10
Respect4.50
Creativity3.75
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.35
Questions4.05
Open full professor record
Nathan Mackey 51 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

51 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.44
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.60
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.02
Grading4.50
Reflection4.56
Respect4.85
Creativity4.71
Feedback4.79
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.81
Questions4.94
Open full professor record
Johannes Reinking 19 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.15
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity2.35
Grading4.10
Reflection4.15
Respect4.85
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.70
Questions4.55
Open full professor record
Tobias Gaillard Oliver 27 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

27 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.55
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.35
Reflection4.60
Respect4.55
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.55
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
Mert Okyay 56 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5

56 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.87
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.52
Contribution4.91
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.59
Grading4.52
Reflection4.62
Respect4.94
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.89
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.81
Questions4.93
Open full professor record
Andres Villani Davila 29 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5

29 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.85
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.75
Reflection4.80
Respect4.70
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.75
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
Nereida Martinez 26 reported responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5

26 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.05
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.10
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity3.95
Grading3.80
Reflection4.20
Respect4.30
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.15
Questions4.05
Open full professor record
Alex Fix 34 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5

34 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.97
Connection4.80
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.80
Reflection4.83
Respect4.87
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.87
Questions4.97
Open full professor record
Corbin Allison 1 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis2.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge3.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Matthew Fox 4 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Arnulf Taylor 33 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

33 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.20
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.35
Grading4.70
Reflection4.60
Respect4.85
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Joe Mccarty 35 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

35 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.40
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.30
Reflection4.70
Respect4.75
Creativity4.05
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.70
Questions4.65
Open full professor record
Noah Welikson 36 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5

36 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.60
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.65
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.85
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
Elliot Roberts 34 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5

34 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.60
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.75
Reflection4.70
Respect4.75
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.90
Questions4.95
Open full professor record
Leo Illing 36 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5

36 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.70
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.70
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.85
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Ben Bobell 43 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

43 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration4.76
Connection4.73
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.77
Reflection4.85
Respect4.88
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.84
Questions4.92
Open full professor record
Matthew Marzano 14 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.90
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.50
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Michael H Ritzwoller 71 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5

71 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.50
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Rudolph Rodriguez 16 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.30
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.05
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect4.65
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.65
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Chanin Kumpeerakij 5 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.35
Technology3.75
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.65
Contribution3.65
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.10
Reflection3.10
Respect4.40
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.25
Questions4.65
Open full professor record
Xeen Meighan 2 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology3.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.00
Questions3.50
Open full professor record
David Perl Nussbaum 38 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

38 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.60
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.50
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.90
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Branden Lee Esses 2 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.