Course record PHYS

PHYS 1125

General Physics 2 for Majors

University of Colorado Boulder

451 grades16 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score21/100
Below average

Professors 16 of 16

Shuo Sun 82 grades · 1 term 3.03GPA
36.6% A
39.0% B
22.0% C
0.0% D
2.4% F

82 letter grades

Compare with the course
Sun vs. the course average
A +7.1
B +1.6
C −5.1
D −1.3
F −2.2

Difference in percentage points.

3.5% withdrew · 3 of 85 enrolled.

Paul D Beale 170 grades · 1 term 2.92GPA
34.1% A
37.1% B
23.5% C
0.0% D
5.3% F

170 letter grades

Compare with the course
Beale vs. the course average
A +4.6
B −0.4
C −3.5
D −1.3
F +0.6

Difference in percentage points.

5.6% withdrew · 10 of 180 enrolled.

Michael Andrew Calkins 94 grades · 1 term 2.68GPA
20.2% A
41.5% B
31.9% C
0.0% D
6.4% F

94 letter grades

Compare with the course
Calkins vs. the course average
A −9.3
B +4.0
C +4.9
D −1.3
F +1.7

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 94 enrolled.

Meredith D Betterton 105 grades · 1 term 2.63GPA
24.8% A
33.3% B
32.4% C
5.7% D
3.8% F

105 letter grades

Compare with the course
Betterton vs. the course average
A −4.7
B −4.1
C +5.3
D +4.4
F −0.8

Difference in percentage points.

6.3% withdrew · 7 of 112 enrolled.

Sterling Lee Tyler 19 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.35
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.65
Reflection4.80
Respect4.85
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.65
Questions4.85
John Wilson 21 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.30
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.55
Reflection4.85
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.95
Questions4.90
Tyler Chase Sterling 13 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology3.90
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.30
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.10
Reflection4.30
Respect4.55
Creativity3.85
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.65
Questions4.85
Daphne Blumin 16 reported responses 3.47Eval / 5
Overall3.47 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology2.90
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.25
Connection3.55
Contribution3.95
Discussion3.75
Inclusivity2.60
Grading2.80
Reflection3.95
Respect4.15
Creativity3.05
Feedback2.90
Interaction4.10
Challenge3.10
Questions3.15
Jack Hollis Farrell 13 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology3.70
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.95
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity2.50
Grading3.75
Reflection4.45
Respect4.50
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.30
Questions4.75
Omar J French 10 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.10
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.30
Reflection4.65
Respect4.80
Creativity3.75
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.45
Questions4.65
Eric Cornell 66 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5

66 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.40
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.30
Reflection4.40
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Johannes Reinking 29 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

29 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.50
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.17
Reflection4.57
Respect4.57
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.23
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.63
Questions4.67
Kenneth Jon Higginbotham 11 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.20
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.40
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Cole Shank 16 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.40
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.15
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.90
Questions4.85
Jonan-Rohi Plueger 26 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

26 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.30
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.50
Reflection4.70
Respect4.95
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.85
Questions4.80
Jonas Boettner 29 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5

29 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.57
Contribution4.87
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.13
Grading4.60
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.93
Challenge5.00
Questions4.83
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.