Course record PHYS

PHYS 1110

General Physics 1

University of Colorado Boulder

7,800 grades143 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score15/100
Needs work

Professors 143 of 143

Colin G West 866 grades · 1 term 2.64GPA
22.9% A
32.0% B
35.9% C
4.6% D
4.6% F

866 letter grades

Compare with the course
West vs. the course average
A +1.2
B +1.7
C +0.1
D −2.2
F −0.9

Difference in percentage points.

6.1% withdrew · 56 of 922 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Loren Evan Hough 269 grades · 1 term 2.63GPA
22.3% A
36.1% B
26.4% C
12.6% D
2.6% F

269 letter grades

Compare with the course
Hough vs. the course average
A +0.6
B +5.8
C −9.4
D +5.8
F −2.9

Difference in percentage points.

7.9% withdrew · 23 of 292 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Murray John Holland 234 grades · 1 term 2.58GPA
19.2% A
31.2% B
40.6% C
6.0% D
3.0% F

234 letter grades

Compare with the course
Holland vs. the course average
A −2.5
B +1.0
C +4.8
D −0.8
F −2.5

Difference in percentage points.

5.3% withdrew · 13 of 247 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Daniel Ryan Bolton 2,312 grades · 1 term 2.51GPA
19.9% A
31.2% B
36.9% C
6.6% D
5.4% F

2,312 letter grades

Compare with the course
Bolton vs. the course average
A −1.8
B +0.9
C +1.1
D −0.2
F −0.1

Difference in percentage points.

6.2% withdrew · 152 of 2,464 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Michael A Dubson 3,489 grades · 1 term 2.50GPA
23.7% A
27.9% B
35.9% C
6.4% D
6.2% F

3,489 letter grades

Compare with the course
Dubson vs. the course average
A +2.0
B −2.4
C +0.1
D −0.4
F +0.7

Difference in percentage points.

8.1% withdrew · 307 of 3,796 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Eleanor R Hodby 406 grades · 1 term 2.48GPA
17.0% A
36.0% B
29.6% C
12.6% D
4.9% F

406 letter grades

Compare with the course
Hodby vs. the course average
A −4.7
B +5.7
C −6.2
D +5.8
F −0.6

Difference in percentage points.

12.3% withdrew · 57 of 463 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Victor Vladimir Gurarie 224 grades · 1 term 2.40GPA
15.2% A
32.1% B
40.2% C
6.7% D
5.8% F

224 letter grades

Compare with the course
Gurarie vs. the course average
A −6.5
B +1.9
C +4.4
D −0.1
F +0.3

Difference in percentage points.

11.5% withdrew · 29 of 253 enrolled.

Open full professor record
William Robert Groman 37 reported responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5

37 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.97
Technology4.33
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration4.35
Connection3.80
Contribution4.08
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity3.33
Grading3.70
Reflection4.18
Respect4.35
Creativity3.73
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.00
Questions4.35
Open full professor record
Jinkang Guo 35 reported responses 3.06Eval / 5
Overall3.06 / 5

35 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.53
Technology2.90
Synthesis2.75
Collaboration3.80
Connection2.60
Contribution3.55
Discussion2.78
Inclusivity2.00
Grading2.50
Reflection2.98
Respect3.40
Creativity2.58
Feedback2.42
Interaction3.70
Challenge3.45
Questions3.10
Open full professor record
Ian Michael Fogarty Florang 39 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

39 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.52
Synthesis4.08
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.08
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.43
Grading4.25
Reflection4.58
Respect4.62
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.58
Questions4.65
Open full professor record
Xiaoyang Huang 40 reported responses 4.01Eval / 5
Overall4.01 / 5

40 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.07
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration4.38
Connection3.70
Contribution4.18
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity3.65
Grading3.82
Reflection3.90
Respect4.25
Creativity3.67
Feedback3.83
Interaction4.15
Challenge4.13
Questions4.18
Open full professor record
Will Hettel 46 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5

46 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.02
Technology4.18
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration4.33
Connection3.63
Contribution3.93
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity3.30
Grading3.75
Reflection4.18
Respect4.53
Creativity3.72
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.30
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Zachary Sierzega 36 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5

36 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.13
Technology4.30
Synthesis3.97
Collaboration3.90
Connection3.73
Contribution3.75
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity2.70
Grading3.93
Reflection4.12
Respect4.43
Creativity3.67
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.38
Challenge4.33
Questions4.65
Open full professor record
Haixin Liu 38 reported responses 3.29Eval / 5
Overall3.29 / 5

38 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology3.55
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration3.75
Connection2.68
Contribution3.72
Discussion3.55
Inclusivity2.93
Grading2.95
Reflection3.30
Respect4.03
Creativity3.15
Feedback2.75
Interaction3.80
Challenge3.10
Questions3.68
Open full professor record
Yan Jin 40 reported responses 3.81Eval / 5
Overall3.81 / 5

40 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology3.93
Synthesis3.55
Collaboration4.10
Connection3.58
Contribution4.12
Discussion3.93
Inclusivity2.72
Grading3.35
Reflection3.90
Respect4.60
Creativity3.40
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.22
Challenge3.63
Questions4.00
Open full professor record
Chase Glenn Brooks 30 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.03
Collaboration4.23
Connection3.90
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity3.17
Grading3.47
Reflection4.47
Respect4.50
Creativity3.87
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.57
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Tobias Gaillard Oliver 25 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5

25 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.33
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.72
Grading4.15
Reflection4.45
Respect4.55
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.27
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.45
Questions4.53
Open full professor record
Haoqing Zhang 18 reported responses 2.81Eval / 5
Overall2.81 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.75
Technology2.50
Synthesis2.45
Collaboration2.95
Connection2.40
Contribution3.20
Discussion3.20
Inclusivity3.10
Grading2.45
Reflection2.95
Respect3.30
Creativity2.75
Feedback2.45
Interaction3.40
Challenge2.60
Questions2.85
Open full professor record
Daniel Lis 33 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5

33 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.01
Technology3.96
Synthesis3.82
Collaboration4.33
Connection3.73
Contribution4.44
Discussion4.36
Inclusivity2.78
Grading3.45
Reflection4.10
Respect4.47
Creativity4.05
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.34
Questions4.34
Open full professor record
Michael Anthony Paolino 19 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.65
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.55
Grading3.40
Reflection4.50
Respect4.65
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.45
Open full professor record
Sarah Kerr 3 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Edwin Camilo Chaparro 37 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

37 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.93
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.48
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.18
Reflection4.35
Respect4.58
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.08
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.25
Questions4.53
Open full professor record
Pedro Victor Bulhoes Barros Portela De Melo 43 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

43 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.44
Technology4.34
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.66
Connection4.02
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity4.14
Grading4.20
Reflection4.46
Respect4.64
Creativity4.18
Feedback4.44
Interaction4.66
Challenge4.38
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Dylan P Mcnally 30 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.18
Collaboration4.57
Connection4.13
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity3.35
Grading3.78
Reflection4.32
Respect4.40
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.60
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
Justin Nicoski 23 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology3.93
Synthesis3.93
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.05
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.48
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.50
Reflection4.15
Respect4.60
Creativity4.25
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.45
Questions4.58
Open full professor record
Zheng Luo 27 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5

27 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.18
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.30
Connection3.75
Contribution4.38
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.73
Grading3.98
Reflection4.25
Respect4.10
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.30
Questions4.30
Open full professor record
Trystan Raymond Smith 28 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

28 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.15
Synthesis3.98
Collaboration4.48
Connection4.08
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.58
Grading4.28
Reflection4.25
Respect4.43
Creativity4.03
Feedback4.03
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.43
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Nikolay Yegovtsev 11 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.45
Connection3.80
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity3.25
Grading3.65
Reflection4.15
Respect4.80
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.25
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Caitlin Ellen Cash 4 reported responses 4.96Eval / 5
Overall4.96 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.30
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Sankalp Gaur 5 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.40
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.20
Reflection4.40
Respect5.00
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Yorick Andeweg 28 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

28 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.33
Synthesis3.88
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.18
Contribution4.32
Discussion4.58
Inclusivity3.58
Grading4.38
Reflection4.57
Respect4.67
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Edward R Kinney 300 reported responses 4.04Eval / 5
Overall4.04 / 5

300 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology3.71
Synthesis3.98
Collaboration4.58
Connection3.77
Contribution4.28
Discussion3.99
Inclusivity3.11
Grading3.73
Reflection4.31
Respect4.27
Creativity3.64
Feedback3.62
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.06
Questions4.14
Open full professor record
Jose Armando Delgado 24 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology3.62
Synthesis4.18
Collaboration4.87
Connection3.93
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.20
Grading3.83
Reflection4.70
Respect4.87
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Tyler Chase Sterling 43 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5

43 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.24
Technology3.50
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration4.53
Connection4.20
Contribution4.24
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity3.92
Grading3.94
Reflection4.29
Respect4.36
Creativity4.13
Feedback4.17
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.30
Questions4.46
Open full professor record
Joseph Bush 26 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

26 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.13
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.13
Reflection4.50
Respect4.95
Creativity3.83
Feedback4.32
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.48
Questions4.68
Open full professor record
Yifan Hong 36 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5

36 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.16
Technology3.90
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.73
Connection3.92
Contribution4.21
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity3.75
Grading3.98
Reflection4.63
Respect4.79
Creativity4.23
Feedback4.29
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.30
Questions4.54
Open full professor record
Ahmed Hossameldin Biby 27 reported responses 3.18Eval / 5
Overall3.18 / 5

27 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.48
Technology2.20
Synthesis3.33
Collaboration4.15
Connection3.00
Contribution3.63
Discussion3.18
Inclusivity2.17
Grading2.50
Reflection3.83
Respect3.83
Creativity3.25
Feedback2.23
Interaction4.18
Challenge2.95
Questions3.30
Open full professor record
Yu Zhang 7 reported responses 3.90Eval / 5
Overall3.90 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology2.85
Synthesis3.65
Collaboration4.30
Connection3.50
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.70
Grading3.00
Reflection4.15
Respect4.35
Creativity3.35
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.75
Challenge3.75
Questions4.10
Open full professor record
Blake Alexander Lee 58 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

58 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.38
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.37
Contribution4.38
Discussion4.36
Inclusivity3.86
Grading4.06
Reflection4.53
Respect4.51
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.09
Interaction4.51
Challenge4.60
Questions4.77
Open full professor record
Chao Yin 13 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.61
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.89
Connection3.88
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.66
Inclusivity3.12
Grading4.68
Reflection4.79
Respect4.70
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.51
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.68
Questions4.85
Open full professor record
Jack Hollis Farrell 104 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5

104 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology3.84
Synthesis4.19
Collaboration4.62
Connection3.99
Contribution4.44
Discussion4.51
Inclusivity3.38
Grading3.96
Reflection4.48
Respect4.45
Creativity4.19
Feedback4.18
Interaction4.69
Challenge4.52
Questions4.46
Open full professor record
Lauren Kennedy 49 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

49 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.24
Synthesis4.54
Collaboration4.76
Connection4.16
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.25
Reflection4.59
Respect4.71
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.17
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.78
Questions4.71
Open full professor record
Carter Robert Mashburn 20 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology3.70
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.43
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.07
Reflection4.70
Respect4.30
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.87
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Mengyu Wu 30 reported responses 4.02Eval / 5
Overall4.02 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.27
Technology3.69
Synthesis4.09
Collaboration4.57
Connection4.13
Contribution3.81
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity3.35
Grading3.68
Reflection4.39
Respect4.46
Creativity3.98
Feedback3.74
Interaction4.47
Challenge4.41
Questions4.37
Open full professor record
Daphne Blumin 8 reported responses 3.69Eval / 5
Overall3.69 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology2.80
Synthesis3.65
Collaboration3.90
Connection2.85
Contribution3.65
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity2.95
Grading3.05
Reflection3.25
Respect4.50
Creativity3.50
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.25
Challenge3.65
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Kaixuan Ji 5 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology3.00
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.40
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity1.30
Grading3.20
Reflection4.40
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Jose Zenon Cortez 31 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5

31 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.28
Technology3.83
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.65
Connection3.85
Contribution4.38
Discussion4.28
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.73
Reflection4.43
Respect4.60
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.25
Questions4.35
Open full professor record
Evan Michael Indge 5 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.20
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Jose Paulo Dincao 12 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology3.70
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.15
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.90
Grading3.75
Reflection4.55
Respect4.60
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.45
Questions4.55
Open full professor record
William Gordon Cain Iii 28 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

28 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.18
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.35
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.48
Grading3.88
Reflection4.55
Respect4.88
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.53
Questions4.68
Open full professor record
Arpi Lilit Grigorian 10 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology3.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.00
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.15
Reflection4.40
Respect4.65
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.35
Open full professor record
Matteo Wilczak 11 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology3.05
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.75
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.90
Reflection4.15
Respect4.60
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.00
Questions4.65
Open full professor record
Branden Lee Esses 17 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.35
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.45
Reflection4.65
Respect4.50
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.75
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Benjamin Thomas Freid 18 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.35
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.45
Reflection4.65
Respect4.65
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.65
Questions4.45
Open full professor record
Vladimir Illich Gorokhovsky 8 reported responses 3.48Eval / 5
Overall3.48 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.65
Technology2.25
Synthesis2.85
Collaboration4.80
Connection2.85
Contribution4.15
Discussion3.45
Inclusivity2.75
Grading3.10
Reflection3.75
Respect4.05
Creativity2.85
Feedback3.25
Interaction3.95
Challenge3.00
Questions3.65
Open full professor record
Sarah Jones 17 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.15
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.30
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.65
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Eric Zimmerman 6 reported responses 3.92Eval / 5
Overall3.92 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology3.50
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.10
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.20
Respect3.50
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.40
Interaction5.00
Challenge3.00
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Edward Tortorici 4 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.30
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity2.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Trevor Geerdts 29 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

29 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.42
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.21
Grading4.38
Reflection4.84
Respect4.79
Creativity4.54
Feedback4.67
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.79
Questions4.86
Open full professor record
Jose Pagan 3 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity2.70
Grading3.70
Reflection5.00
Respect4.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Ben Freid 20 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology3.95
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.15
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.45
Grading3.85
Reflection4.60
Respect4.50
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.65
Open full professor record
Eric Fang 33 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5

33 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology3.50
Synthesis3.97
Collaboration4.83
Connection3.60
Contribution4.38
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity3.22
Grading3.62
Reflection4.32
Respect4.63
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.35
Questions4.43
Open full professor record
Molly Griston 45 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

45 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology3.90
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.40
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.25
Reflection4.70
Respect4.70
Creativity4.28
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.65
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Jonan-Rohi Plueger 28 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

28 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.95
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.28
Contribution4.97
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.62
Grading4.30
Reflection4.70
Respect4.99
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.70
Questions4.69
Open full professor record
Camille Yoke 40 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

40 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology3.85
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.95
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity2.68
Grading3.92
Reflection4.45
Respect4.80
Creativity3.97
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.60
Questions4.73
Open full professor record
Kenneth Jon Higginbotham 11 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.75
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity2.65
Grading3.00
Reflection4.30
Respect4.90
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Seth Grable 110 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

110 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.50
Contribution3.91
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.34
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.25
Feedback3.66
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Xiongwei Liu 14 reported responses 4.07Eval / 5
Overall4.07 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology2.93
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.37
Connection3.37
Contribution4.17
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.57
Reflection4.33
Respect4.33
Creativity3.77
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.47
Challenge3.93
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Lyryl Varekamp 34 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5

34 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology3.63
Synthesis3.98
Collaboration4.65
Connection3.68
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.13
Inclusivity3.30
Grading3.98
Reflection4.28
Respect4.33
Creativity3.55
Feedback3.78
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.35
Questions4.53
Open full professor record
Kai Win Wong 6 reported responses 3.37Eval / 5
Overall3.37 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology2.50
Synthesis3.15
Collaboration3.25
Connection3.60
Contribution3.25
Discussion3.40
Inclusivity1.00
Grading3.50
Reflection3.00
Respect3.25
Creativity2.50
Feedback3.50
Interaction3.35
Challenge3.35
Questions3.90
Open full professor record
Nicole Luna 8 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.17
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.83
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.33
Reflection4.90
Respect4.83
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.13
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Nanako Shitara 14 reported responses 3.98Eval / 5
Overall3.98 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology3.45
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.70
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity2.60
Grading3.15
Reflection4.00
Respect4.60
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.15
Challenge4.45
Questions4.30
Open full professor record
Mert Okyay 8 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology3.30
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.00
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.90
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Sofia Brown 37 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

37 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology3.90
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.10
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity3.55
Grading3.80
Reflection4.43
Respect4.73
Creativity3.88
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.25
Questions4.68
Open full professor record
Isabella Zane 50 reported responses 3.75Eval / 5
Overall3.75 / 5

50 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.09
Technology3.05
Synthesis4.02
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.92
Contribution4.27
Discussion3.76
Inclusivity3.14
Grading2.68
Reflection3.94
Respect4.39
Creativity3.68
Feedback3.23
Interaction4.21
Challenge3.84
Questions3.65
Open full professor record
Alyx Patterson 19 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology3.75
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.40
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.85
Grading3.35
Reflection4.45
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.40
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Marcel Mazur 45 reported responses 3.94Eval / 5
Overall3.94 / 5

45 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.98
Technology3.68
Synthesis3.86
Collaboration4.26
Connection3.86
Contribution3.96
Discussion3.94
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.74
Reflection3.92
Respect4.50
Creativity3.72
Feedback3.62
Interaction4.40
Challenge3.78
Questions3.92
Open full professor record
Jonathan Friduss 40 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5

40 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology3.45
Synthesis3.93
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.10
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity3.43
Grading3.75
Reflection4.28
Respect4.45
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.97
Interaction4.57
Challenge4.30
Questions4.43
Open full professor record
Keegan Finger 15 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology3.45
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.10
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity2.75
Grading4.00
Reflection4.35
Respect4.55
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Tobin Leo Munsat 1 reported responses 3.71Eval / 5
Overall3.71 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration2.00
Connection4.00
Contribution1.00
Inclusivity1.00
Reflection4.00
Interaction5.00
Open full professor record
Shunjie Han 23 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.20
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.05
Grading4.15
Reflection4.55
Respect4.55
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.50
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
Eli Katz 12 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology3.95
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration4.10
Connection3.35
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity3.15
Grading4.05
Reflection4.35
Respect4.25
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.45
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Fatema Fairooz 4 reported responses 3.89Eval / 5
Overall3.89 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology2.20
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion3.20
Inclusivity4.70
Grading3.00
Reflection4.80
Respect4.20
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.20
Questions3.00
Open full professor record
Kevin M Stenson 5 reported responses 3.64Eval / 5
Overall3.64 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Synthesis3.17
Collaboration3.33
Connection4.00
Contribution4.50
Inclusivity2.50
Reflection3.17
Interaction3.50
Open full professor record
Alex Ball 36 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5

36 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.03
Synthesis4.13
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.02
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.70
Grading3.97
Reflection4.55
Respect4.90
Creativity4.13
Feedback4.48
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.63
Questions4.82
Open full professor record
Emma Burton 33 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

33 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.72
Connection4.13
Contribution4.52
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.10
Reflection4.70
Respect4.87
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.80
Questions4.93
Open full professor record
Elyssa Roeder 28 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

28 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.23
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.38
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.48
Grading3.93
Reflection4.50
Respect4.63
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.68
Questions4.55
Open full professor record
Gewei Chen 34 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

34 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.02
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.35
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.28
Reflection4.60
Respect4.93
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.72
Questions4.65
Open full professor record
Cole Shank 51 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5

51 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.96
Technology3.48
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.54
Connection3.98
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity3.14
Grading3.79
Reflection4.34
Respect4.38
Creativity3.64
Feedback4.04
Interaction4.52
Challenge4.25
Questions4.36
Open full professor record
Michael Topper 62 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5

62 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology3.45
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.68
Connection3.90
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.48
Inclusivity3.43
Grading3.65
Reflection4.20
Respect4.00
Creativity3.95
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.28
Questions4.45
Open full professor record
Dmitri Anatoljevich Uzdensky 16 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology3.60
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.10
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.15
Grading3.70
Reflection4.35
Respect4.30
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.45
Open full professor record
Luke Adams 14 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology3.90
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.25
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.90
Reflection4.75
Respect4.65
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.75
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
Matthew Fox 40 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

40 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.98
Technology4.51
Synthesis4.97
Collaboration4.99
Connection4.97
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.93
Grading4.05
Reflection4.90
Respect4.99
Creativity4.97
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.85
Questions4.99
Open full professor record
Leo Beck 29 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

29 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.18
Collaboration4.63
Connection4.13
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.20
Grading3.83
Reflection4.55
Respect4.70
Creativity4.23
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.25
Questions4.55
Open full professor record
Max Weiner 12 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.05
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.50
Reflection4.65
Respect4.80
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.60
Questions4.95
Open full professor record
Gang Cao 2 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Inclusivity4.00
Reflection5.00
Interaction5.00
Open full professor record
Husna Amini 34 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

34 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.22
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.08
Contribution4.28
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.17
Grading4.13
Reflection4.38
Respect4.73
Creativity4.28
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.48
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Jay Hwang 29 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5

29 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology3.72
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.40
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.05
Reflection4.40
Respect4.83
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.13
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.33
Questions4.68
Open full professor record
Donna Depolo 37 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

37 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology3.72
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.79
Connection4.03
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity3.86
Grading3.78
Reflection4.48
Respect4.67
Creativity4.39
Feedback4.19
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.55
Questions4.52
Open full professor record
Vikina Martinez 34 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

34 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology3.95
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.18
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.30
Reflection4.60
Respect4.65
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.13
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.55
Questions4.55
Open full professor record
Oluwafunmilayo Comfort Adedokun 41 reported responses 3.74Eval / 5
Overall3.74 / 5

41 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.02
Technology3.13
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.47
Connection3.68
Contribution3.93
Discussion3.85
Inclusivity3.47
Grading3.08
Reflection3.80
Respect4.33
Creativity3.72
Feedback3.15
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.65
Questions3.78
Open full professor record
Yichi Zhang 22 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology3.90
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.30
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.05
Grading4.25
Reflection4.60
Respect4.70
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.40
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Ben Johnston 12 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology3.75
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.80
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.65
Grading4.25
Reflection4.25
Respect4.50
Creativity3.85
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.75
Questions4.65
Open full professor record
Joonseok Hur 3 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.30
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Tyler C Mcmaken 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Spencer Jordan Hall 12 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.86
Connection4.67
Contribution4.81
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.43
Reflection4.71
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.62
Interaction4.95
Challenge5.00
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Corbin Allison 30 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.28
Technology3.75
Synthesis4.18
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.13
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity3.48
Grading3.95
Reflection4.27
Respect4.53
Creativity4.15
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.50
Questions4.30
Open full professor record
Katherine Slattery 31 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

31 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.95
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.60
Grading3.65
Reflection4.50
Respect4.68
Creativity3.98
Feedback4.38
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.33
Questions4.83
Open full professor record
Joe Mccarty 38 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

38 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology3.97
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.47
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity3.33
Grading3.83
Reflection4.52
Respect4.72
Creativity4.02
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.58
Questions4.52
Open full professor record
Elena Ros 19 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology3.95
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.20
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.65
Grading4.30
Reflection4.45
Respect4.50
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.50
Questions4.65
Open full professor record
Yun Ma 38 reported responses 3.78Eval / 5
Overall3.78 / 5

38 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.93
Technology3.05
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.63
Contribution3.88
Discussion3.83
Inclusivity3.23
Grading3.37
Reflection3.73
Respect4.30
Creativity3.17
Feedback3.45
Interaction4.38
Challenge3.70
Questions4.12
Open full professor record
Henry Jordan 33 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5

33 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.18
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity3.53
Grading4.05
Reflection4.63
Respect4.75
Creativity4.28
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.68
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Vimal Palanivelrajan 28 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5

28 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology3.58
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.68
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.75
Grading3.55
Reflection4.20
Respect4.45
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.45
Questions4.45
Open full professor record
Krish Patel 33 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

33 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology3.83
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.30
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity3.88
Grading3.95
Reflection4.65
Respect4.63
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.70
Questions4.88
Open full professor record
Michael Freeman 25 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5

25 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology3.50
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.65
Connection3.85
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.05
Reflection4.45
Respect4.25
Creativity4.05
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.30
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Ben Bobell 39 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

39 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.33
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.18
Grading4.58
Reflection4.65
Respect4.65
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Matthew Smith 33 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

33 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology3.85
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.72
Connection4.40
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity3.68
Grading4.13
Reflection4.53
Respect4.55
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.77
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Jiazheng Li 18 reported responses 3.98Eval / 5
Overall3.98 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology3.23
Synthesis3.73
Collaboration4.10
Connection3.57
Contribution3.83
Discussion4.23
Inclusivity2.37
Grading3.57
Reflection3.87
Respect4.40
Creativity4.07
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.47
Challenge3.97
Questions4.17
Open full professor record
Tianhao Liu 37 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5

37 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology3.67
Synthesis4.34
Collaboration4.74
Connection4.16
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity3.94
Grading3.81
Reflection4.19
Respect4.62
Creativity3.77
Feedback4.08
Interaction4.54
Challenge4.31
Questions4.36
Open full professor record
Cade Pair 8 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.10
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.00
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.10
Questions4.20
Open full professor record
Ben Mcdonough 39 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

39 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.62
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.18
Grading4.47
Reflection4.77
Respect4.85
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.75
Questions4.77
Open full professor record
Xianliang Lu 32 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5

32 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.18
Technology3.50
Synthesis4.13
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.30
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.48
Inclusivity3.40
Grading3.77
Reflection4.40
Respect4.35
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.35
Questions4.58
Open full professor record
Xinrong Chen 30 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.22
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.24
Collaboration4.74
Connection4.00
Contribution4.36
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.62
Grading3.78
Reflection4.52
Respect4.68
Creativity4.24
Feedback4.12
Interaction4.52
Challenge4.06
Questions4.38
Open full professor record
Giaco Corsiglia 26 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5

26 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Wei-En Tseng 3 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.70
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.70
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Yu Fei Liu 38 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5

38 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.83
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.50
Contribution4.83
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.40
Reflection4.88
Respect4.88
Creativity4.68
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.88
Questions4.85
Open full professor record
Priya Tiwari 21 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology3.25
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.78
Connection4.05
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.15
Grading3.25
Reflection4.48
Respect4.35
Creativity4.05
Feedback4.08
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.45
Questions4.08
Open full professor record
Matthew Everette 26 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

26 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.47
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.43
Reflection4.73
Respect4.70
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.62
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Tao Yuan 21 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.41
Technology4.01
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.47
Connection4.32
Contribution4.36
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity4.42
Grading4.01
Reflection4.15
Respect4.86
Creativity4.34
Feedback4.06
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.32
Questions4.43
Open full professor record
Noah Schwartz 33 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

33 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.08
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.25
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity3.93
Grading4.10
Reflection4.70
Respect4.85
Creativity4.22
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.85
Questions4.93
Open full professor record
Hexiang Chang 36 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

36 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.05
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity3.75
Grading3.53
Reflection4.68
Respect4.75
Creativity4.38
Feedback4.28
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.88
Questions4.77
Open full professor record
Michael Oconnor 20 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.27
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.43
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity3.63
Grading4.38
Reflection4.82
Respect4.93
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.65
Questions4.88
Open full professor record
Harley Fasullo 31 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5

31 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.53
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.47
Reflection4.82
Respect4.88
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.83
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Emily Clark 21 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.20
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.45
Grading4.25
Reflection4.65
Respect4.50
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Luke Zhou 32 reported responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5

32 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.13
Technology3.55
Synthesis4.08
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.55
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.03
Inclusivity2.95
Grading3.75
Reflection4.15
Respect4.45
Creativity3.78
Feedback3.93
Interaction4.57
Challenge4.23
Questions4.35
Open full professor record
Thanmay Sunil Menon 16 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.95
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity2.95
Grading3.95
Reflection4.45
Respect4.75
Creativity3.80
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.55
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
Liam Keeley 30 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.78
Connection4.58
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity3.68
Grading4.10
Reflection4.65
Respect4.65
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.47
Questions4.58
Open full professor record
Josephine Meyer 6 reported responses 3.34Eval / 5
Overall3.34 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.20
Technology2.20
Synthesis2.60
Collaboration4.60
Connection2.80
Contribution4.00
Discussion2.50
Inclusivity2.00
Grading2.25
Reflection4.30
Respect4.50
Creativity2.60
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.50
Challenge2.70
Questions4.20
Open full professor record
Hayes Brodsky 22 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.30
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.57
Reflection4.80
Respect4.97
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.88
Questions4.85
Open full professor record
Arlo Marquez Grap 17 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.05
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.15
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity3.43
Grading4.20
Reflection4.43
Respect4.53
Creativity4.13
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
May An Van De Poll 24 reported responses 3.73Eval / 5
Overall3.73 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology2.75
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.65
Connection3.95
Contribution3.70
Discussion3.88
Inclusivity2.50
Grading2.98
Reflection3.93
Respect4.13
Creativity3.90
Feedback2.95
Interaction4.03
Challenge4.18
Questions3.93
Open full professor record
Joshua Friedman 13 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology3.50
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.67
Connection3.67
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.07
Inclusivity3.40
Grading3.83
Reflection4.37
Respect4.60
Creativity3.57
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.43
Open full professor record
Akshay Pal 9 reported responses 3.91Eval / 5
Overall3.91 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration4.15
Connection4.10
Contribution3.80
Discussion3.85
Inclusivity3.05
Grading4.00
Reflection4.25
Respect4.10
Creativity3.55
Feedback3.50
Interaction3.85
Challenge4.10
Questions4.00
Open full professor record
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.