Course record PHIL

PHIL 3190

War and Morality

University of Colorado Boulder

446 grades17 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score47/100
Mixed record

Professors 17 of 17

Scott Andrew Hill 39 grades · 1 term 3.81GPA
87.2% A
7.7% B
5.1% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

39 letter grades

Compare with the course
Hill vs. the course average
A +37.2
B −26.8
C −4.7
D −2.2
F −3.4

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 39 enrolled.

David A Youkey 200 grades · 1 term 3.55GPA
68.0% A
25.0% B
3.5% C
1.0% D
2.5% F

200 letter grades

Compare with the course
Youkey vs. the course average
A +18.0
B −9.5
C −6.4
D −1.2
F −0.9

Difference in percentage points.

2.4% withdrew · 5 of 205 enrolled.

Eric C Brown 138 grades · 1 term 2.93GPA
26.8% A
52.9% B
13.0% C
2.9% D
4.3% F

138 letter grades

Compare with the course
Brown vs. the course average
A −23.2
B +18.4
C +3.2
D +0.7
F +1.0

Difference in percentage points.

5.5% withdrew · 8 of 146 enrolled.

Jay Radley Geyer 35 grades · 1 term 2.79GPA
22.9% A
45.7% B
22.9% C
5.7% D
2.9% F

35 letter grades

Compare with the course
Geyer vs. the course average
A −27.1
B +11.2
C +13.0
D +3.5
F −0.5

Difference in percentage points.

5.4% withdrew · 2 of 37 enrolled.

Renaud Philippe Malcom Garner 34 grades · 1 term 2.53GPA
23.5% A
35.3% B
26.5% C
5.9% D
8.8% F

34 letter grades

Compare with the course
Garner vs. the course average
A −26.5
B +0.8
C +16.6
D +3.6
F +5.5

Difference in percentage points.

8.1% withdrew · 3 of 37 enrolled.

Richard Alonzo Fyfe 23 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.60
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.20
Reflection4.30
Respect4.90
Creativity3.80
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.20
Questions4.40
Daniel Sturgis 22 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.60
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.70
Reflection4.20
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Megan Louise Kitts 20 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.80
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.90
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Zak Alexander Kopeikin 20 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.80
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.80
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Sandra Skene 46 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

46 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.94
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.91
Collaboration4.78
Connection4.86
Contribution4.93
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.87
Reflection4.88
Respect4.86
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.92
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.89
Questions4.90
Katie Mccabe 14 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration3.40
Connection4.90
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.90
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.90
Questions4.80
Joy Webb 12 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration2.90
Connection4.70
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.00
Reflection4.40
Respect4.60
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.40
Questions4.60
Gail E. Linsenbard 4 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration2.70
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.20
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge5.00
Questions4.00
Kimberly Madero 4 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration2.70
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.80
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Edward Andrew Greetis 1 reported responses 3.44Eval / 5
Overall3.44 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology1.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion3.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading1.00
Reflection5.00
Creativity3.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge3.00
Questions1.00
Sparrow Locurto 1 reported responses 2.78Eval / 5
Overall2.78 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology1.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion1.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading1.00
Reflection5.00
Creativity2.00
Feedback1.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge2.00
Questions1.00
Apostolos Pittas 11 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.80
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.90
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.80
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.