Course record PHIL
PHIL 2270
Philosophy and Race
University of Colorado Boulder
1,790 grades35 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score47/100
Mixed record
Sandra Skene 291 grades · 1 term 3.71GPA
291 letter grades
Compare with the course
Skene vs. the course average
A
+20.6
B
−13.2
C
−4.6
D
−1.0
F
−1.8
Difference in percentage points.
2.0% withdrew · 6 of 297 enrolled.
Overall4.18 / 5
120 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology4.09
Synthesis3.93
Collaboration3.41
Connection4.76
Contribution3.81
Discussion4.39
Inclusivity4.78
Grading4.05
Reflection4.14
Respect4.76
Creativity3.45
Feedback3.45
Interaction4.33
Challenge3.93
Questions4.15
Colin C Smith 79 grades · 1 term 3.63GPA
79 letter grades
Compare with the course
Smith vs. the course average
A
+13.5
B
−4.3
C
−6.8
D
−2.4
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
1.3% withdrew · 1 of 80 enrolled.
Overall4.67 / 5
54 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.90
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.95
Grading4.75
Reflection4.65
Respect4.95
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.75
Questions4.95
Lisa N Thomas-Smith 41 grades · 1 term 3.56GPA
41 letter grades
Compare with the course
Thomas-Smith vs. the course average
A
+9.6
B
−3.9
C
−3.2
D
−2.4
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
4.7% withdrew · 2 of 43 enrolled.
Overall4.54 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.73
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.64
Inclusivity4.81
Grading4.73
Reflection4.78
Respect4.55
Creativity4.12
Feedback4.08
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.47
Questions4.77
Scott Andrew Hill 372 grades · 1 term 3.52GPA
372 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hill vs. the course average
A
+1.7
B
+2.9
C
−0.8
D
−1.6
F
−2.2
Difference in percentage points.
3.1% withdrew · 12 of 384 enrolled.
Overall4.60 / 5
132 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.84
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.71
Collaboration4.15
Connection4.87
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.93
Grading4.39
Reflection4.72
Respect4.94
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.13
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.67
Questions4.71
Daniel Immerman 35 grades · 1 term 3.51GPA
35 letter grades
Compare with the course
Immerman vs. the course average
A
+18.8
B
−20.2
C
−2.3
D
+3.3
F
+0.3
Difference in percentage points.
2.8% withdrew · 1 of 36 enrolled.
Overall4.92 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Zak Alexander Kopeikin 187 grades · 1 term 3.46GPA
187 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kopeikin vs. the course average
A
+10.5
B
−12.5
C
+2.7
D
−1.3
F
+0.7
Difference in percentage points.
1.6% withdrew · 3 of 190 enrolled.
Overall4.73 / 5
143 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.80
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.95
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.75
Questions4.80
Kierstan Bailey Thomas 35 grades · 1 term 3.39GPA
35 letter grades
Compare with the course
Thomas vs. the course average
A
−1.2
B
+8.4
C
−5.2
D
+0.5
F
−2.5
Difference in percentage points.
5.4% withdrew · 2 of 37 enrolled.
Overall2.46 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology2.30
Synthesis2.90
Collaboration1.90
Connection3.20
Contribution2.70
Discussion2.90
Inclusivity3.90
Grading1.80
Reflection2.90
Respect3.50
Creativity2.70
Feedback1.60
Interaction2.70
Challenge2.40
Questions1.90
Martin Alberto Chamorro 87 grades · 1 term 3.34GPA
87 letter grades
Compare with the course
Chamorro vs. the course average
A
+0.9
B
−4.0
C
+1.2
D
+3.3
F
−1.4
Difference in percentage points.
1.1% withdrew · 1 of 88 enrolled.
Overall4.58 / 5
151 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.82
Technology4.59
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.81
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.83
Grading4.30
Reflection4.62
Respect4.69
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.79
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.80
Questions4.66
Donna Reeves 37 grades · 1 term 3.19GPA
37 letter grades
Compare with the course
Reeves vs. the course average
A
−39.6
B
+41.7
C
+2.8
D
−2.4
F
−2.5
Difference in percentage points.
5.1% withdrew · 2 of 39 enrolled.
Overall4.31 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology3.30
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.70
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.90
Grading3.90
Reflection4.10
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.20
Questions4.50
Edward Andrew Greetis 478 grades · 1 term 3.14GPA
478 letter grades
Compare with the course
Greetis vs. the course average
A
−14.3
B
+10.1
C
+1.4
D
+0.5
F
+2.3
Difference in percentage points.
3.4% withdrew · 17 of 495 enrolled.
Overall4.51 / 5
252 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.88
Technology4.24
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.61
Connection4.77
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.89
Grading4.22
Reflection4.54
Respect4.77
Creativity4.41
Feedback4.08
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.59
Questions4.51
Connor Kayhan Kianpour 97 grades · 1 term 3.02GPA
97 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kianpour vs. the course average
A
−14.8
B
−2.2
C
+10.5
D
+6.9
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
1.0% withdrew · 1 of 98 enrolled.
Overall4.58 / 5
82 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.91
Technology4.19
Synthesis4.69
Collaboration3.81
Connection4.74
Contribution4.71
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.92
Grading4.54
Reflection4.74
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.67
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.78
Questions4.81
Ajene Nicar Robinson-Burris 51 grades · 1 term 2.85GPA
51 letter grades
Compare with the course
Robinson-Burris vs. the course average
A
−20.0
B
+3.5
C
+3.7
D
+3.5
F
+9.3
Difference in percentage points.
13.6% withdrew · 8 of 59 enrolled.
Martin Ablerto Chamorro 10 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration3.90
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.50
Reflection5.00
Respect4.90
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Jason Pranaitis 23 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.40
Reflection4.70
Respect4.70
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.30
Questions4.50
Brandon Michael Price 42 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Dawn Marie Jacob 30 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.77
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.93
Grading4.87
Reflection4.83
Respect4.93
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.87
Questions4.90
Amanda Michelle Loeffelholz 20 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration4.57
Connection4.87
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.73
Reflection4.87
Respect4.87
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.87
Questions4.83
Quinn Thomas Hermon 26 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration3.97
Connection4.63
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.97
Reflection4.53
Respect4.37
Creativity3.30
Feedback3.87
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.13
Questions4.63
Joseph Wilson 1 reported responses 3.60Eval / 5
Overall3.60 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration2.00
Connection3.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity3.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.00
Questions4.00
Anthony Neal Sharra 64 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
64 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.83
Technology4.04
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.07
Connection4.65
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.31
Reflection4.90
Respect4.92
Creativity4.17
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.69
Questions4.77
Jennifer Joyce Gallagher 49 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.63
Connection4.77
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.87
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.37
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.63
Questions4.93
Ajene Nicar Robinson-Figuereo 7 reported responses 2.73Eval / 5
Overall2.73 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.23
Technology2.77
Synthesis3.07
Collaboration2.85
Connection3.77
Contribution3.30
Discussion2.99
Inclusivity3.62
Grading2.77
Reflection3.68
Respect3.84
Creativity2.68
Feedback2.00
Interaction3.07
Challenge2.77
Questions2.00
Brita Ager-Hart 14 reported responses 3.97Eval / 5
Overall3.97 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.60
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.03
Connection4.13
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.17
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.83
Reflection4.13
Respect4.50
Creativity3.77
Feedback3.47
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.97
Questions4.20
Derick Hughes 50 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
50 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.49
Synthesis4.41
Collaboration3.08
Connection4.39
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.24
Inclusivity4.69
Grading4.02
Reflection4.34
Respect4.50
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.21
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.48
Questions4.26
Joy Webb 27 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.93
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.97
Grading4.70
Reflection4.80
Respect4.97
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.80
Questions4.83
Travis Rebello 37 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.37
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.57
Connection4.80
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.43
Reflection4.83
Respect4.90
Creativity3.93
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.80
Questions4.83
Cole Baisch 3 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.70
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Vishnu Sridharan 37 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.60
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.60
Grading3.95
Reflection4.35
Respect4.60
Creativity4.15
Feedback3.65
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.30
Questions4.00
Erica A Nieblas 14 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.95
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.74
Collaboration4.96
Connection4.97
Contribution4.97
Discussion4.17
Inclusivity4.99
Grading4.23
Reflection4.77
Respect4.96
Creativity4.69
Feedback3.72
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.45
Questions4.33
Sparrow Locurto 19 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.07
Technology3.87
Synthesis3.83
Collaboration4.03
Connection4.37
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.37
Inclusivity4.43
Grading3.67
Reflection4.23
Respect4.57
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.33
Challenge4.07
Questions4.37
Idowu Odeyemi 10 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.44
Technology4.23
Synthesis3.91
Collaboration2.35
Connection4.37
Contribution3.25
Discussion3.93
Inclusivity4.46
Grading3.91
Reflection4.23
Respect4.23
Creativity4.55
Feedback3.39
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.75
Questions3.98
Matthew Francis Kelley 26 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.70
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.50
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Wayne Nicholas Hardaker 6 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.70
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.30
Reflection4.70
Respect4.70
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.50
Questions4.70
Levi Smith 16 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.83
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration3.83
Connection4.93
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.93
Grading4.13
Reflection4.50
Respect4.93
Creativity3.53
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.63
Rebecca Bailey 7 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.70
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.90
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.30
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.