Course record PHIL
PHIL 2200
Major Social and Political Theories
University of Colorado Boulder
315 grades13 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score28/100
Below average
Wayne Nicholas Hardaker 37 grades · 1 term 3.81GPA
37 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hardaker vs. the course average
A
+51.7
B
−32.1
C
−17.1
D
+1.9
F
−4.4
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 37 enrolled.
Overall4.76 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge5.00
Questions4.90
Yong Dou Kim 28 grades · 1 term 3.28GPA
28 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kim vs. the course average
A
+17.9
B
−10.6
C
−10.0
D
+3.7
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
3.4% withdrew · 1 of 29 enrolled.
Overall4.99 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Hye-Ryoung Kang 30 grades · 1 term 3.08GPA
30 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kang vs. the course average
A
+7.1
B
−2.1
C
−10.5
D
+3.2
F
+2.2
Difference in percentage points.
3.2% withdrew · 1 of 31 enrolled.
Overall4.05 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology3.40
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.80
Reflection3.90
Respect4.30
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.30
Questions3.20
Caleb Herman Perl 31 grades · 1 term 3.06GPA
31 letter grades
Compare with the course
Perl vs. the course average
A
−17.1
B
+26.0
C
−1.0
D
−3.5
F
−4.4
Difference in percentage points.
3.1% withdrew · 1 of 32 enrolled.
Stanley Matthew Stolte 27 grades · 1 term 2.95GPA
27 letter grades
Compare with the course
Stolte vs. the course average
A
+9.0
B
−21.0
C
+8.8
D
+0.2
F
+3.0
Difference in percentage points.
12.9% withdrew · 4 of 31 enrolled.
Overall4.22 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.30
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.00
Reflection4.30
Respect4.30
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.30
Questions4.50
Donna Reeves 35 grades · 1 term 2.94GPA
35 letter grades
Compare with the course
Reeves vs. the course average
A
−25.7
B
+30.8
C
same
D
−0.6
F
−4.4
Difference in percentage points.
7.9% withdrew · 3 of 38 enrolled.
Overall4.47 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology2.90
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.60
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.70
Grading3.40
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.40
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.60
Questions4.20
Benjamin Michael Kultgen 37 grades · 1 term 2.86GPA
37 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kultgen vs. the course average
A
−5.0
B
−5.0
C
+12.6
D
−0.8
F
−1.7
Difference in percentage points.
5.1% withdrew · 2 of 39 enrolled.
Overall4.72 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.70
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.50
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Edward Andrew Greetis 57 grades · 1 term 2.79GPA
57 letter grades
Compare with the course
Greetis vs. the course average
A
−11.3
B
+8.3
C
+0.4
D
−3.5
F
+6.1
Difference in percentage points.
9.5% withdrew · 6 of 63 enrolled.
Overall4.34 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.95
Connection4.60
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.75
Grading3.95
Reflection4.65
Respect4.65
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.55
Questions4.50
Spencer Jay Case 33 grades · 1 term 2.67GPA
33 letter grades
Compare with the course
Case vs. the course average
A
−18.6
B
−1.8
C
+16.2
D
+2.6
F
+1.6
Difference in percentage points.
5.7% withdrew · 2 of 35 enrolled.
Overall4.13 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.70
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.60
Grading3.70
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity3.40
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.20
Questions4.20
Heather M Stewart 20 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.70
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.20
Reflection4.40
Respect4.90
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
John Joseph Porter 15 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.90
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.20
Reflection5.00
Respect4.90
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.60
Alan G Sumler 12 reported responses 3.54Eval / 5
Overall3.54 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration2.70
Connection4.00
Contribution2.90
Discussion3.20
Inclusivity3.90
Grading3.50
Reflection3.90
Respect4.30
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.10
Interaction3.40
Challenge3.80
Questions3.60
Erica A Nieblas 23 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.76
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration3.67
Connection4.88
Contribution4.36
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.81
Reflection4.78
Respect4.90
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.42
Challenge4.47
Questions4.62
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.