PHIL 1100 — Ethics at University of Colorado Boulder

Michael Scott Sechman 62 grades · 1 term 3.78GPA

87.1% A

8.1% B

3.2% C

0.0% D

1.6% F

62 letter grades

Compare with the course

Sechman vs. the course average

A +45.1

B −25.6

C −11.3

D −3.9

F −4.2

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 62 enrolled.

Open full professor record

Wayne Nicholas Hardaker 40 grades · 1 term 3.56GPA

72.5% A

20.0% B

2.5% C

5.0% D

0.0% F

40 letter grades

Compare with the course

Hardaker vs. the course average

A +30.5

B −13.7

C −12.1

D +1.1

F −5.8

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 40 enrolled.

Open full professor record

Emily Jean Slome 67 grades · 1 term 3.52GPA

65.7% A

28.4% B

3.0% C

0.0% D

3.0% F

67 letter grades

Compare with the course

Slome vs. the course average

A +23.7

B −5.4

C −11.6

D −3.9

F −2.9

Difference in percentage points.

2.9% withdrew · 2 of 69 enrolled.

Open full professor record

Michael J Zerella 128 grades · 1 term 3.48GPA

64.1% A

26.6% B

7.8% C

0.8% D

0.8% F

128 letter grades

Compare with the course

Zerella vs. the course average

A +22.1

B −7.2

C −6.7

D −3.1

F −5.1

Difference in percentage points.

0.8% withdrew · 1 of 129 enrolled.

Open full professor record

Thomas Anthony Bonn 56 grades · 1 term 3.41GPA

55.4% A

33.9% B

8.9% C

0.0% D

1.8% F

56 letter grades

Compare with the course

Bonn vs. the course average

A +13.3

B +0.2

C −5.6

D −3.9

F −4.1

Difference in percentage points.

3.4% withdrew · 2 of 58 enrolled.

Open full professor record

Christopher Ray Dengler 59 grades · 1 term 3.32GPA

62.7% A

20.3% B

11.9% C

3.4% D

1.7% F

59 letter grades

Compare with the course

Dengler vs. the course average

A +20.7

B −13.4

C −2.7

D −0.5

F −4.1

Difference in percentage points.

4.8% withdrew · 3 of 62 enrolled.

Open full professor record

Jason Timothy Potter 39 grades · 1 term 3.30GPA

48.7% A

35.9% B

15.4% C

0.0% D

0.0% F

39 letter grades

Compare with the course

Potter vs. the course average

A +6.7

B +2.2

C +0.8

D −3.9

F −5.8

Difference in percentage points.

2.5% withdrew · 1 of 40 enrolled.

Open full professor record

Stanley Matthew Stolte 71 grades · 1 term 3.24GPA

52.1% A

35.2% B

2.8% C

4.2% D

5.6% F

71 letter grades

Compare with the course

Stolte vs. the course average

A +10.1

B +1.5

C −11.7

D +0.3

F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

6.6% withdrew · 5 of 76 enrolled.

Open full professor record

Donna Reeves 36 grades · 1 term 3.20GPA

22.2% A

66.7% B

11.1% C

0.0% D

0.0% F

36 letter grades

Compare with the course

Reeves vs. the course average

A −19.8

B +33.0

C −3.4

D −3.9

F −5.8

Difference in percentage points.

5.3% withdrew · 2 of 38 enrolled.

Open full professor record

Daniel Douglas Carr 66 grades · 1 term 3.18GPA

42.4% A

40.9% B

12.1% C

1.5% D

3.0% F

66 letter grades

Compare with the course

Carr vs. the course average

A +0.4

B +7.2

C −2.4

D −2.4

F −2.8

Difference in percentage points.

5.7% withdrew · 4 of 70 enrolled.

Open full professor record

Kelsi Macken Nagy 36 grades · 1 term 3.17GPA

27.8% A

61.1% B

11.1% C

0.0% D

0.0% F

36 letter grades

Compare with the course

Nagy vs. the course average

A −14.2

B +27.4

C −3.4

D −3.9

F −5.8

Difference in percentage points.

2.7% withdrew · 1 of 37 enrolled.

Open full professor record

Benjamin Michael Kultgen 221 grades · 1 term 3.15GPA

48.9% A

32.1% B

12.2% C

4.1% D

2.7% F

221 letter grades

Compare with the course

Kultgen vs. the course average

A +6.9

B −1.6

C −2.3

D +0.2

F −3.1

Difference in percentage points.

2.6% withdrew · 6 of 227 enrolled.

Open full professor record

Wyatt Monroe Mcdaniel 200 grades · 1 term 3.15GPA

50.0% A

33.0% B

8.5% C

2.5% D

6.0% F

200 letter grades

Compare with the course

Mcdaniel vs. the course average

A +8.0

B −0.7

C −6.1

D −1.4

F +0.2

Difference in percentage points.

2.4% withdrew · 5 of 205 enrolled.

Open full professor record

Daniel Sturgis 63 grades · 1 term 3.10GPA

36.5% A

41.3% B

20.6% C

1.6% D

0.0% F

63 letter grades

Compare with the course

Sturgis vs. the course average

A −5.5

B +7.6

C +6.1

D −2.3

F −5.8

Difference in percentage points.

10.0% withdrew · 7 of 70 enrolled.

Open full professor record

Scott Benjamin Ritner 34 grades · 1 term 3.04GPA

41.2% A

41.2% B

8.8% C

2.9% D

5.9% F

34 letter grades

Compare with the course

Ritner vs. the course average

A −0.8

B +7.5

C −5.7

D −0.9

F same

Difference in percentage points.

8.1% withdrew · 3 of 37 enrolled.

Open full professor record

Joseph Leo Frigault 26 grades · 1 term 3.03GPA

26.9% A

53.8% B

11.5% C

7.7% D

0.0% F

26 letter grades

Compare with the course

Frigault vs. the course average

A −15.1

B +20.1

C −3.0

D +3.8

F −5.8

Difference in percentage points.

3.7% withdrew · 1 of 27 enrolled.

Open full professor record

Derick Hughes 135 grades · 1 term 3.02GPA

42.2% A

36.3% B

10.4% C

5.2% D

5.9% F

135 letter grades

Compare with the course

Hughes vs. the course average

A +0.2

B +2.6

C −4.2

D +1.3

F +0.1

Difference in percentage points.

4.3% withdrew · 6 of 141 enrolled.

Open full professor record

Christopher Charles Heathwood 180 grades · 1 term 3.02GPA

43.9% A

31.7% B

13.9% C

5.6% D

5.0% F

180 letter grades

Compare with the course

Heathwood vs. the course average

A +1.9

B −2.0

C −0.7

D +1.7

F −0.8

Difference in percentage points.

3.2% withdrew · 6 of 186 enrolled.

Open full professor record

Daniel Jacobson 267 grades · 1 term 3.01GPA

47.2% A

28.5% B

13.1% C

5.6% D

5.6% F

267 letter grades

Compare with the course

Jacobson vs. the course average

A +5.2

B −5.2

C −1.5

D +1.7

F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

4.6% withdrew · 13 of 280 enrolled.

Open full professor record

Adam Joseph Shriver 46 grades · 1 term 3.00GPA

50.0% A

28.3% B

13.0% C

0.0% D

8.7% F

46 letter grades

Compare with the course

Shriver vs. the course average

A +8.0

B −5.5

C −1.5

D −3.9

F +2.9

Difference in percentage points.

2.1% withdrew · 1 of 47 enrolled.

Open full professor record

Julia Levin 38 grades · 1 term 2.92GPA

34.2% A

39.5% B

18.4% C

2.6% D

5.3% F

38 letter grades

Compare with the course

Levin vs. the course average

A −7.8

B +5.8

C +3.9

D −1.2

F −0.6

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 38 enrolled.

Open full professor record

Eric C Brown 39 grades · 1 term 2.88GPA

30.8% A

43.6% B

17.9% C

2.6% D

5.1% F

39 letter grades

Compare with the course

Brown vs. the course average

A −11.2

B +9.9

C +3.4

D −1.3

F −0.7

Difference in percentage points.

2.5% withdrew · 1 of 40 enrolled.

Open full professor record

Merily Salura 68 grades · 1 term 2.86GPA

41.2% A

27.9% B

19.1% C

4.4% D

7.4% F

68 letter grades

Compare with the course

Salura vs. the course average

A −0.8

B −5.8

C +4.6

D +0.5

F +1.5

Difference in percentage points.

5.6% withdrew · 4 of 72 enrolled.

Open full professor record

Robert C Pasnau 72 grades · 1 term 2.80GPA

27.8% A

43.1% B

18.1% C

4.2% D

6.9% F

72 letter grades

Compare with the course

Pasnau vs. the course average

A −14.2

B +9.3

C +3.5

D +0.3

F +1.1

Difference in percentage points.

1.4% withdrew · 1 of 73 enrolled.

Open full professor record

Claudia Mills 85 grades · 1 term 2.76GPA

24.7% A

35.3% B

31.8% C

5.9% D

2.4% F

85 letter grades

Compare with the course

Mills vs. the course average

A −17.3

B +1.6

C +17.2

D +2.0

F −3.5

Difference in percentage points.

3.4% withdrew · 3 of 88 enrolled.

Open full professor record

Andrew Raymond Young 61 grades · 1 term 2.71GPA

26.2% A

39.3% B

16.4% C

13.1% D

4.9% F

61 letter grades

Compare with the course

Young vs. the course average

A −15.8

B +5.6

C +1.8

D +9.2

F −0.9

Difference in percentage points.

10.3% withdrew · 7 of 68 enrolled.

Open full professor record

Richard Alonzo Fyfe 127 grades · 1 term 2.66GPA

25.2% A

41.7% B

20.5% C

3.1% D

9.4% F

127 letter grades

Compare with the course

Fyfe vs. the course average

A −16.8

B +8.0

C +5.9

D −0.7

F +3.6

Difference in percentage points.

5.9% withdrew · 8 of 135 enrolled.

Open full professor record

Brian Thomas Talbot 137 grades · 1 term 2.63GPA

24.1% A

38.0% B

28.5% C

2.2% D

7.3% F

137 letter grades

Compare with the course

Talbot vs. the course average

A −17.9

B +4.2

C +13.9

D −1.7

F +1.5

Difference in percentage points.

4.2% withdrew · 6 of 143 enrolled.

Open full professor record

Gagan G S Sapkota 60 grades · 1 term 2.60GPA

25.0% A

35.0% B

25.0% C

8.3% D

6.7% F

60 letter grades

Compare with the course

Sapkota vs. the course average

A −17.0

B +1.3

C +10.4

D +4.5

F +0.8

Difference in percentage points.

4.8% withdrew · 3 of 63 enrolled.

Open full professor record

Patrick R Leland 96 grades · 1 term 2.47GPA

30.2% A

31.3% B

16.7% C

6.3% D

15.6% F

96 letter grades

Compare with the course

Leland vs. the course average

A −11.8

B −2.5

C +2.1

D +2.4

F +9.8

Difference in percentage points.

10.3% withdrew · 11 of 107 enrolled.

Open full professor record

Evan Jaymes Frook 57 grades · 1 term 2.42GPA

26.3% A

26.3% B

28.1% C

8.8% D

10.5% F

57 letter grades

Compare with the course

Frook vs. the course average

A −15.7

B −7.4

C +13.5

D +4.9

F +4.7

Difference in percentage points.

5.0% withdrew · 3 of 60 enrolled.

Open full professor record

Spencer Jay Case 66 grades · 1 term 2.31GPA

21.2% A

33.3% B

21.2% C

3.0% D

21.2% F

66 letter grades

Compare with the course

Case vs. the course average

A −20.8

B −0.4

C +6.7

D −0.9

F +15.4

Difference in percentage points.

4.3% withdrew · 3 of 69 enrolled.

Open full professor record

Kristin Demetriou 71 grades · 1 term 2.23GPA

22.5% A

32.4% B

16.9% C

5.6% D

22.5% F

71 letter grades

Compare with the course

Demetriou vs. the course average

A −19.5

B −1.3

C +2.3

D +1.8

F +16.7

Difference in percentage points.

11.3% withdrew · 9 of 80 enrolled.

Open full professor record

Nathaniel Edward Anderson 51 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5

Overall4.38 / 5

51 reported responses

Scale 1–5

Critical examination of evidence4.47

Technology4.27

Synthesis4.47

Collaboration4.13

Connection4.40

Contribution4.30

Discussion4.63

Inclusivity4.47

Grading4.17

Reflection4.60

Respect4.60

Creativity3.93

Feedback4.30

Interaction4.63

Challenge4.40

Questions4.57

Open full professor record

Megan Louise Kitts 55 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5

Overall4.32 / 5

55 reported responses

Scale 1–5

Critical examination of evidence4.60

Technology4.40

Synthesis4.12

Collaboration2.89

Connection4.30

Contribution4.30

Discussion4.32

Inclusivity4.41

Grading4.02

Reflection3.95

Respect4.60

Creativity4.08

Feedback4.12

Interaction4.05

Challenge4.30

Questions4.14

Open full professor record

Jonathyn C Zapf 7 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5

Overall4.73 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5

Critical examination of evidence4.90

Technology4.40

Synthesis4.60

Collaboration4.10

Connection4.90

Contribution4.90

Discussion4.70

Inclusivity4.90

Grading4.90

Reflection4.90

Respect4.90

Creativity4.70

Feedback4.90

Interaction4.60

Challenge4.40

Questions5.00

Open full professor record

Ethan Chapman 14 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5

Overall4.62 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5

Critical examination of evidence4.63

Technology4.53

Synthesis4.57

Collaboration4.37

Connection4.63

Contribution4.50

Discussion4.93

Inclusivity4.93

Grading4.57

Reflection4.80

Respect4.77

Creativity4.30

Feedback4.47

Interaction4.50

Challenge4.83

Questions4.77

Open full professor record

Matthew Robert Pike 72 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5

Overall4.75 / 5

72 reported responses

Scale 1–5

Critical examination of evidence4.85

Technology4.88

Synthesis4.66

Collaboration4.55

Connection4.94

Contribution4.84

Discussion4.81

Inclusivity4.63

Grading4.76

Reflection4.90

Respect4.93

Creativity4.73

Feedback4.69

Interaction4.84

Challenge4.88

Questions4.87

Open full professor record

Andrew David Chapman 3 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5

Overall4.66 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5

Critical examination of evidence4.30

Technology5.00

Synthesis3.70

Collaboration4.30

Connection4.30

Contribution4.70

Discussion5.00

Inclusivity4.30

Grading5.00

Reflection4.30

Respect5.00

Creativity5.00

Feedback4.70

Interaction4.70

Challenge4.30

Questions5.00

Open full professor record

Eric Fox 3 reported responses 4.11Eval / 5

Overall4.11 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5

Critical examination of evidence4.30

Technology3.00

Synthesis3.70

Collaboration4.30

Connection4.30

Contribution4.70

Discussion3.00

Inclusivity4.30

Grading3.00

Reflection4.30

Respect5.00

Creativity5.00

Feedback3.50

Interaction4.70

Challenge4.50

Questions3.50

Open full professor record

Henry Campbell 5 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5

Overall4.31 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5

Critical examination of evidence5.00

Technology4.80

Synthesis4.80

Collaboration3.00

Connection4.60

Contribution4.60

Discussion4.40

Inclusivity4.20

Grading3.40

Reflection4.60

Respect4.80

Creativity5.00

Feedback5.00

Interaction3.20

Challenge4.60

Questions4.60

Open full professor record

Joy Webb 11 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5

Overall4.43 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5

Critical examination of evidence4.40

Technology4.60

Synthesis4.30

Collaboration3.90

Connection4.70

Contribution4.60

Discussion4.70

Inclusivity4.50

Grading4.50

Reflection4.40

Respect4.60

Creativity4.30

Feedback4.20

Interaction4.30

Challenge4.60

Questions4.30

Open full professor record

Charlie Roberts 71 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5

Overall4.49 / 5

71 reported responses

Scale 1–5

Critical examination of evidence4.98

Technology4.69

Synthesis4.91

Collaboration4.59

Connection4.75

Contribution4.98

Discussion4.99

Inclusivity4.73

Grading4.91

Reflection4.92

Respect4.95

Creativity4.03

Feedback4.01

Interaction4.95

Challenge4.85

Questions4.75

Open full professor record

Connor Kayhan Kianpour 12 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5

Overall4.88 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5

Critical examination of evidence5.00

Technology3.50

Synthesis4.80

Collaboration4.50

Connection4.90

Contribution5.00

Discussion5.00

Inclusivity5.00

Grading4.90

Reflection5.00

Respect4.90

Creativity4.80

Feedback4.80

Interaction4.80

Challenge5.00

Questions4.20

Open full professor record

Hunter Jin 11 reported responses 3.96Eval / 5

Overall3.96 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5

Critical examination of evidence4.40

Technology4.10

Synthesis3.90

Collaboration3.90

Connection4.40

Contribution4.10

Discussion3.80

Inclusivity4.60

Grading3.70

Reflection4.40

Respect4.40

Creativity3.60

Feedback3.40

Interaction4.40

Challenge3.90

Questions4.20

Open full professor record

Kristin Marie Mickelson 13 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5

Overall4.09 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5

Critical examination of evidence4.05

Technology3.58

Synthesis3.78

Collaboration2.92

Connection3.91

Contribution4.08

Discussion3.78

Inclusivity3.31

Grading3.78

Reflection4.05

Respect3.98

Creativity4.01

Feedback3.30

Interaction4.00

Challenge3.82

Questions3.93

Open full professor record

Hossein Mohayeji Nasr Abadi 52 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5

Overall4.15 / 5

52 reported responses

Scale 1–5

Critical examination of evidence4.36

Technology4.16

Synthesis4.30

Collaboration3.55

Connection4.37

Contribution4.03

Discussion4.31

Inclusivity4.32

Grading3.71

Reflection4.41

Respect4.51

Creativity3.83

Feedback3.82

Interaction4.12

Challenge4.26

Questions4.36

Open full professor record

Kyle Nathaneal York 94 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5

Overall4.50 / 5

94 reported responses

Scale 1–5

Critical examination of evidence4.68

Technology4.32

Synthesis4.52

Collaboration4.48

Connection4.62

Contribution4.62

Discussion4.86

Inclusivity4.70

Grading4.38

Reflection4.52

Respect4.88

Creativity4.12

Feedback3.92

Interaction4.80

Challenge4.60

Questions4.74

Open full professor record

Amanda Michelle Loeffelholz 35 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5

Overall4.89 / 5

35 reported responses

Scale 1–5

Critical examination of evidence4.98

Technology4.79

Synthesis5.00

Collaboration4.04

Connection5.00

Contribution4.92

Discussion4.97

Inclusivity4.95

Grading4.91

Reflection4.97

Respect5.00

Creativity4.89

Feedback4.88

Interaction4.86

Challenge4.97

Questions4.95

Open full professor record

Eunjin Hong 22 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5

Overall4.19 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5

Critical examination of evidence4.70

Technology4.25

Synthesis4.59

Collaboration4.51

Connection4.48

Contribution4.66

Discussion4.76

Inclusivity4.87

Grading4.40

Reflection4.80

Respect4.50

Creativity4.18

Feedback4.24

Interaction4.76

Challenge4.67

Questions4.51

Open full professor record

Xingzhu Chen 17 reported responses 3.23Eval / 5

Overall3.23 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5

Critical examination of evidence3.97

Technology2.87

Synthesis3.40

Collaboration2.90

Connection3.47

Contribution3.43

Discussion3.27

Inclusivity3.73

Grading3.10

Reflection3.83

Respect3.77

Creativity2.17

Feedback2.33

Interaction3.63

Challenge3.47

Questions3.10

Open full professor record

Robert Anthony Williams 5 reported responses 3.70Eval / 5

Overall3.70 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5

Critical examination of evidence4.20

Technology3.40

Synthesis3.40

Collaboration3.00

Connection3.60

Contribution3.00

Discussion3.70

Inclusivity4.20

Grading3.80

Reflection3.60

Respect4.80

Creativity2.20

Feedback2.80

Interaction5.00

Challenge3.80

Questions4.20

Open full professor record

John Joseph Porter 38 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5

Overall4.67 / 5

38 reported responses

Scale 1–5

Critical examination of evidence4.90

Technology4.10

Synthesis4.70

Collaboration4.80

Connection4.80

Contribution4.80

Discussion5.00

Inclusivity4.80

Grading4.10

Reflection4.80

Respect4.90

Creativity4.60

Feedback4.30

Interaction5.00

Challenge4.90

Questions4.80

Open full professor record

Travis Rebello 85 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5

Overall4.69 / 5

85 reported responses

Scale 1–5

Critical examination of evidence4.89

Technology3.96

Synthesis4.56

Collaboration4.72

Connection4.50

Contribution4.73

Discussion4.92

Inclusivity4.67

Grading4.50

Reflection4.75

Respect4.85

Creativity4.31

Feedback4.44

Interaction4.96

Challenge4.66

Questions4.89

Open full professor record

Tim Burkhardt 57 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5

Overall4.47 / 5

57 reported responses

Scale 1–5

Critical examination of evidence4.75

Technology4.45

Synthesis4.65

Collaboration3.55

Connection4.75

Contribution4.40

Discussion4.80

Inclusivity4.65

Grading4.35

Reflection4.50

Respect4.85

Creativity3.80

Feedback4.25

Interaction4.65

Challenge4.70

Questions4.85

Open full professor record

Shane Bodhi Melnitzer 13 reported responses 4.93Eval / 5

Overall4.93 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5

Critical examination of evidence4.80

Technology4.90

Synthesis4.80

Collaboration4.80

Connection4.80

Contribution4.70

Discussion5.00

Inclusivity4.90

Grading5.00

Reflection4.70

Respect5.00

Creativity4.90

Feedback5.00

Interaction4.90

Challenge5.00

Questions5.00

Open full professor record

David Mghanga Mwakima 62 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5

Overall4.51 / 5

62 reported responses

Scale 1–5

Critical examination of evidence4.78

Technology4.56

Synthesis4.52

Collaboration4.03

Connection4.61

Contribution4.70

Discussion4.70

Inclusivity4.70

Grading4.30

Reflection4.67

Respect4.82

Creativity4.51

Feedback3.93

Interaction4.67

Challenge4.68

Questions4.69

Open full professor record

Alan G Sumler 8 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5

Overall4.21 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5

Critical examination of evidence4.60

Technology3.90

Synthesis4.00

Collaboration4.50

Connection4.50

Contribution4.40

Discussion4.00

Inclusivity4.50

Grading3.30

Reflection4.80

Respect5.00

Creativity4.20

Feedback3.80

Interaction4.90

Challenge4.00

Questions4.30

Open full professor record

Ruby Pfeifle 13 reported responses 3.97Eval / 5

Overall3.97 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5

Critical examination of evidence4.40

Technology4.10

Synthesis4.50

Collaboration3.50

Connection4.80

Contribution3.60

Discussion3.80

Inclusivity4.20

Grading3.40

Reflection4.40

Respect4.30

Creativity4.20

Feedback3.80

Interaction4.10

Challenge4.10

Questions4.10

Open full professor record

Jackie Han 49 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5

Overall4.44 / 5

49 reported responses

Scale 1–5

Critical examination of evidence4.73

Technology3.60

Synthesis4.43

Collaboration4.27

Connection4.30

Contribution4.60

Discussion4.73

Inclusivity4.30

Grading4.33

Reflection4.60

Respect4.57

Creativity3.60

Feedback4.20

Interaction4.80

Challenge4.57

Questions4.60

Open full professor record

Professors 60 of 60