Course record NRSC
NRSC 2200
Laboratory Techniques in Neuroscience
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable18 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score79/100
Strong
Heidi E W Day 369 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
369 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.72
Contribution4.82
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.36
Grading4.81
Reflection4.84
Respect4.82
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.87
Questions4.90
Brandon Marquart 25 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.74
Technology4.96
Synthesis4.54
Collaboration4.84
Connection4.79
Contribution4.74
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.73
Reflection4.86
Respect4.96
Creativity4.79
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.91
Questions4.91
Annie Ly 22 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.66
Connection4.50
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity3.92
Grading4.70
Reflection4.51
Respect4.94
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.79
Questions4.78
Connor John Mcnulty 37 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.59
Synthesis4.29
Collaboration4.79
Connection4.29
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.18
Reflection4.40
Respect4.40
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.68
Questions4.57
Gabriel William Costanza-Chavez 30 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.79
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration4.99
Connection4.79
Contribution4.79
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.19
Grading4.70
Reflection4.89
Respect4.90
Creativity4.69
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Nathan Anderson 17 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.60
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.40
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.80
Jhair Branco Torres 14 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.70
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Elora Wolf Williams 15 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.70
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Deepika Dokuru 36 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.22
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.17
Contribution4.39
Discussion4.59
Inclusivity4.02
Grading4.42
Reflection4.44
Respect4.54
Creativity4.08
Feedback4.16
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.55
Questions4.34
Helen King Strnad 18 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.90
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Maya Paulson 39 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.92
Connection4.70
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.34
Grading4.88
Reflection4.77
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.75
Questions5.00
Emma Keppler 38 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.68
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.41
Grading4.72
Reflection4.78
Respect4.88
Creativity4.78
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.88
Questions4.90
Greta Missbach 33 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.33
Contribution4.66
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.86
Reflection4.78
Respect4.88
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.74
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.78
Questions4.85
Jennifer Marie Stratford 36 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.25
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.90
Reflection4.80
Respect4.95
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Claudia Paniagua-Ugarte 37 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.82
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.82
Contribution4.92
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.81
Grading4.85
Reflection4.92
Respect5.00
Creativity4.68
Feedback4.85
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.85
Jeremy Taylor 30 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.92
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.60
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.88
Reflection4.98
Respect4.82
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.98
Interaction4.90
Challenge5.00
Questions4.98
Elizabeth Ann Stubblefield 16 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.20
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.50
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Lia Farrell 18 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.90
Reflection4.90
Respect4.80
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.