Course record NRSC
NRSC 2125
Introduction to Neuroscience I: Foundations
University of Colorado Boulder
442 grades14 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2022–2026
Flunk Score26/100
Below average
Serge Campeau 213 grades · 1 term 3.03GPA
213 letter grades
Compare with the course
Campeau vs. the course average
A
−0.4
B
+4.5
C
−1.4
D
−1.9
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
3.6% withdrew · 8 of 221 enrolled.
Overall4.52 / 5
158 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.54
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.05
Connection4.69
Contribution4.13
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.31
Grading4.54
Reflection4.68
Respect4.78
Creativity4.11
Feedback3.66
Interaction4.54
Challenge4.61
Questions4.82
Michael V Baratta 210 grades · 1 term 2.82GPA
210 letter grades
Compare with the course
Baratta vs. the course average
A
−3.6
B
−3.2
C
+3.1
D
+2.4
F
+1.3
Difference in percentage points.
5.8% withdrew · 13 of 223 enrolled.
Overall4.37 / 5
153 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration3.42
Connection4.73
Contribution3.83
Discussion4.42
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.56
Reflection4.47
Respect4.81
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.65
Interaction4.21
Challenge4.71
Questions4.74
Elizabeth Ronda Woodruff 19 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.89GPA
19 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 19 enrolled.
Overall4.85 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.90
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.80
Reflection4.90
Respect4.80
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Lydia Rader 22 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.50
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.60
Reflection4.90
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.80
Questions4.85
Anushri Kartik Narayan 24 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.81
Technology4.91
Synthesis4.81
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.81
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity4.79
Grading4.89
Reflection4.96
Respect4.93
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.81
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.91
Questions4.93
Kris Lauridsen 14 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.40
Connection3.95
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.65
Reflection4.55
Respect4.35
Creativity3.55
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.20
Questions4.85
Elora Wolf Williams 31 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.22
Technology4.47
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration3.78
Connection4.34
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.48
Inclusivity4.22
Grading4.20
Reflection4.43
Respect4.66
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.48
Interaction4.17
Challenge4.50
Questions4.47
Kelly Winther 48 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
48 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.44
Collaboration4.41
Connection4.73
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.92
Reflection4.92
Respect4.89
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.82
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.93
Questions4.93
Jhair Branco Torres 27 reported responses 3.59Eval / 5
Overall3.59 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology3.71
Synthesis3.22
Collaboration2.90
Connection3.83
Contribution3.51
Discussion3.71
Inclusivity3.64
Grading3.45
Reflection3.91
Respect4.54
Creativity3.59
Feedback2.46
Interaction3.48
Challenge3.84
Questions4.13
Helen King Strnad 4 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.70
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Carlin Pendell 40 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.22
Collaboration4.38
Connection4.35
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.65
Reflection4.62
Respect4.79
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.31
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.66
Questions4.69
Jennifer Gove 26 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.15
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.55
Reflection4.40
Respect4.90
Creativity3.70
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.05
Questions4.65
Jacqui Fallon 11 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.10
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.40
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Skylar Ruffner 37 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.92
Synthesis4.71
Collaboration4.29
Connection4.57
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.83
Reflection4.82
Respect5.00
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.71
Challenge4.80
Questions4.96
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.