Course record MUSC

MUSC 2121

Aural Skills Lab, Semester 3

University of Colorado Boulder

223 grades13 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score44/100
Mixed record

Professors 13 of 13

Devin Ariel Guerrero 31 grades · 1 term 3.68GPA
77.4% A
16.1% B
6.5% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

31 letter grades

Compare with the course
Guerrero vs. the course average
A +20.9
B −14.4
C −0.7
D −4.0
F −1.8

Difference in percentage points.

3.1% withdrew · 1 of 32 enrolled.

Abigail Kellems 27 grades · 1 term 3.41GPA
55.6% A
33.3% B
11.1% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

27 letter grades

Compare with the course
Kellems vs. the course average
A −0.9
B +2.8
C +3.9
D −4.0
F −1.8

Difference in percentage points.

3.6% withdrew · 1 of 28 enrolled.

Philip C Chang 29 grades · 1 term 3.22GPA
51.7% A
31.0% B
6.9% C
6.9% D
3.4% F

29 letter grades

Compare with the course
Chang vs. the course average
A −4.8
B +0.5
C −0.3
D +2.9
F +1.7

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 29 enrolled.

Max Allan Wolpert 52 grades · 1 term 3.17GPA
48.1% A
32.7% B
11.5% C
5.8% D
1.9% F

52 letter grades

Compare with the course
Wolpert vs. the course average
A −8.4
B +2.2
C +4.4
D +1.7
F +0.1

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 52 enrolled.

Kevin Gunia 15 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.85GPA
86.7% A
13.3% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

15 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 15 enrolled.

Karin Buer 18 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.60GPA
66.7% A
33.3% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

18 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 18 enrolled.

Mark L Arnett 17 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.14GPA
52.9% A
23.5% B
11.8% C
11.8% D
0.0% F

17 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 17 enrolled.

Blake Clawson 15 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.12GPA
33.3% A
60.0% B
0.0% C
6.7% D
0.0% F

15 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 15 enrolled.

Victor Chinbat Avila Luvsangenden 19 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.93GPA
42.1% A
36.8% B
5.3% C
5.3% D
10.5% F

19 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 19 enrolled.

Abby Kellems 8 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology4.35
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration4.15
Connection3.20
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.50
Reflection3.80
Respect4.65
Creativity3.75
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.65
Questions4.50
Lauren Renee Lier 14 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.05
Connection4.30
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.80
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.75
Questions4.75
Ethan Bonnell 9 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.70
Connection3.85
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity3.10
Grading4.30
Reflection4.20
Respect4.85
Creativity4.15
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.55
Questions4.25
Leah Renee Porter Tracy 22 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.80
Connection3.90
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.15
Grading4.85
Reflection4.25
Respect4.90
Creativity3.65
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.