Course record MUSC
MUSC 1121
Aural Skills Lab, Semester 1
University of Colorado Boulder
277 grades16 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score44/100
Mixed record
Samuel Falotico 25 grades · 1 term 3.64GPA
25 letter grades
Compare with the course
Falotico vs. the course average
A
+7.7
B
+4.2
C
−5.7
D
−2.9
F
−3.2
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 25 enrolled.
Overall4.76 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.20
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.95
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.85
Questions4.95
John Harrington Boggs 25 grades · 1 term 3.52GPA
25 letter grades
Compare with the course
Boggs vs. the course average
A
+11.7
B
−3.8
C
−9.7
D
+1.1
F
+0.8
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 25 enrolled.
Overall4.68 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology5.00
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.75
Reflection4.65
Respect5.00
Creativity3.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.80
Mark L Arnett 38 grades · 1 term 3.49GPA
38 letter grades
Compare with the course
Arnett vs. the course average
A
+10.8
B
−8.0
C
+0.8
D
−2.9
F
−0.6
Difference in percentage points.
5.0% withdrew · 2 of 40 enrolled.
Overall4.66 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.63
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.51
Collaboration4.05
Connection3.87
Contribution4.18
Discussion4.66
Inclusivity3.32
Grading4.77
Reflection4.79
Respect4.64
Creativity4.33
Feedback4.89
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.79
Questions4.72
Kevin Gunia 27 grades · 1 term 3.40GPA
27 letter grades
Compare with the course
Gunia vs. the course average
A
+21.2
B
−16.4
C
−9.7
D
−2.9
F
+7.9
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 27 enrolled.
Overall4.81 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.35
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.95
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.85
Questions5.00
Karin Buer 69 grades · 1 term 3.36GPA
69 letter grades
Compare with the course
Buer vs. the course average
A
−5.2
B
+9.5
C
−1.1
D
−1.4
F
−1.8
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 69 enrolled.
Overall4.59 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.74
Technology3.73
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration4.06
Connection3.94
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.52
Grading4.52
Reflection4.57
Respect4.72
Creativity4.76
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.93
Questions4.84
Blake Clawson 28 grades · 1 term 2.96GPA
28 letter grades
Compare with the course
Clawson vs. the course average
A
−13.9
B
−2.4
C
+8.1
D
+7.8
F
+0.3
Difference in percentage points.
3.4% withdrew · 1 of 29 enrolled.
Overall4.35 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration4.10
Connection3.45
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.35
Reflection4.55
Respect4.75
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.85
Questions4.80
Abigail Kellems 25 grades · 1 term 2.94GPA
25 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kellems vs. the course average
A
−12.3
B
−3.8
C
+14.3
D
+1.1
F
+0.8
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 25 enrolled.
Samuel Curtis Henderson 14 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.49GPA
14 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 14 enrolled.
Overall3.82 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.65
Collaboration4.50
Connection2.90
Contribution4.00
Discussion3.75
Inclusivity4.15
Grading3.80
Reflection3.55
Respect4.40
Creativity2.25
Feedback3.55
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.00
Questions4.40
Julia Grace Sills 14 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.03GPA
14 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 14 enrolled.
Overall4.53 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.25
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.60
Reflection4.90
Respect4.50
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.60
Questions4.75
Lauren Renee Lier 12 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.94GPA
12 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 12 enrolled.
Overall4.79 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.45
Connection3.60
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.90
Reflection4.80
Respect4.95
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.95
Philip C Chang 2 reported responses 3.67Eval / 5
Overall3.67 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection3.00
Respect4.50
Creativity2.50
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge2.50
Questions4.50
Abby Kellems 12 reported responses 3.90Eval / 5
Overall3.90 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.45
Connection2.75
Contribution3.50
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity1.60
Grading4.15
Reflection3.50
Respect4.50
Creativity3.60
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.85
Questions4.70
Leah Renee Porter Tracy 4 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology4.35
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration3.15
Connection3.50
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity1.75
Grading4.65
Reflection4.35
Respect5.00
Creativity3.85
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.85
Questions4.50
Ben Work 18 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.15
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.25
Connection3.70
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.05
Reflection4.20
Respect4.80
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.20
Questions4.30
Noah Nussbaum 26 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.05
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.90
Reflection4.75
Respect4.80
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.70
Questions4.95
Indigo Farmer 5 reported responses 3.58Eval / 5
Overall3.58 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.50
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration3.85
Connection1.50
Contribution3.00
Discussion3.65
Inclusivity2.50
Grading4.15
Reflection3.65
Respect4.00
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.15
Interaction3.35
Challenge3.25
Questions3.75
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.