Course record MUEL
MUEL 2061
Introduction to Music Technology
University of Colorado Boulder
332 grades12 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score72/100
Strong
Conor Abbott Brown 33 grades · 1 term 3.95GPA
33 letter grades
Compare with the course
Brown vs. the course average
A
+11.7
B
−5.1
C
−4.5
D
−0.9
F
−1.2
Difference in percentage points.
8.3% withdrew · 3 of 36 enrolled.
Overall4.79 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.98
Collaboration4.07
Connection4.28
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.68
Grading4.82
Reflection4.78
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.93
Questions5.00
Alan Mackwell 31 grades · 1 term 3.88GPA
31 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mackwell vs. the course average
A
+8.3
B
−4.9
C
−1.3
D
−0.9
F
−1.2
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 31 enrolled.
Overall4.72 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.61
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.91
Collaboration3.55
Connection3.09
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.82
Grading4.97
Reflection4.92
Respect4.97
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.42
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.28
Questions4.38
Sean A Winters 30 grades · 1 term 3.84GPA
30 letter grades
Compare with the course
Winters vs. the course average
A
+8.1
B
−4.8
C
−4.5
D
+2.4
F
−1.2
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 30 enrolled.
Overall4.56 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.02
Technology4.96
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration3.76
Connection4.31
Contribution4.27
Discussion3.81
Inclusivity3.67
Grading3.96
Reflection4.17
Respect4.44
Creativity4.54
Feedback3.55
Interaction4.44
Challenge4.74
Questions3.62
Jessica Ann Lause 56 grades · 1 term 3.75GPA
56 letter grades
Compare with the course
Lause vs. the course average
A
+0.5
B
+2.6
C
−4.5
D
+0.9
F
+0.6
Difference in percentage points.
5.1% withdrew · 3 of 59 enrolled.
Overall4.65 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.02
Connection4.48
Contribution4.51
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.51
Grading4.52
Reflection4.46
Respect4.93
Creativity4.98
Feedback4.91
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.84
Questions4.82
Charles Mcclung 48 grades · 1 term 3.74GPA
48 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mcclung vs. the course average
A
+2.3
B
−4.0
C
+1.7
D
−0.9
F
+0.9
Difference in percentage points.
11.1% withdrew · 6 of 54 enrolled.
Overall4.73 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.86
Collaboration4.57
Connection4.62
Contribution4.82
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.52
Grading4.91
Reflection4.52
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.86
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.86
Questions4.95
Gracie Jane Fagan 30 grades · 1 term 3.69GPA
30 letter grades
Compare with the course
Fagan vs. the course average
A
−1.9
B
−1.5
C
+2.1
D
+2.4
F
−1.2
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 30 enrolled.
Overall4.66 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.56
Technology4.97
Synthesis4.96
Collaboration3.94
Connection4.22
Contribution4.82
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity3.64
Grading4.94
Reflection4.71
Respect4.37
Creativity4.98
Feedback4.44
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.94
Questions4.86
Ilan Blanck 60 grades · 1 term 3.61GPA
60 letter grades
Compare with the course
Blanck vs. the course average
A
−8.6
B
+3.5
C
+7.1
D
−0.9
F
−1.2
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 60 enrolled.
Overall4.81 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.18
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.24
Connection4.63
Contribution4.82
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.71
Grading4.79
Reflection4.79
Respect4.95
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.99
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.78
Questions4.95
John Clay Allen 29 grades · 1 term 3.42GPA
29 letter grades
Compare with the course
Allen vs. the course average
A
−16.3
B
+12.6
C
+2.4
D
−0.9
F
+2.2
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 29 enrolled.
Overall4.61 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.97
Collaboration4.11
Connection4.63
Contribution4.71
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.36
Grading4.64
Reflection4.69
Respect4.76
Creativity4.82
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.71
Challenge4.93
Questions4.76
David Paul Landon 15 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.61GPA
15 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 15 enrolled.
Jessie Lause 3 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.42
Connection4.00
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
John Earl Drumheller Iii 10 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.93
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection5.00
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.93
Reflection4.72
Respect4.93
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.93
Questions4.78
Addison Hill 23 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration3.94
Connection4.32
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity4.48
Grading4.75
Reflection4.55
Respect4.92
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.58
Questions4.85
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.