Course record MUEL
MUEL 1115
Piano Class 1
University of Colorado Boulder
438 grades22 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score52/100
Mixed record
Elizabeth Jane Smith 36 grades · 1 term 3.66GPA
36 letter grades
Compare with the course
Smith vs. the course average
A
+5.2
B
−1.4
C
+3.3
D
−2.3
F
−4.8
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 36 enrolled.
Overall5.00 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Joel David Reid 42 grades · 1 term 3.53GPA
42 letter grades
Compare with the course
Reid vs. the course average
A
+3.6
B
−1.0
C
−5.0
D
+2.5
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
6.7% withdrew · 3 of 45 enrolled.
Overall4.76 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.97
Technology4.86
Synthesis4.81
Collaboration4.03
Connection4.82
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.79
Reflection4.75
Respect4.74
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.46
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.87
Questions4.48
James Hunter Morris 67 grades · 1 term 3.51GPA
67 letter grades
Compare with the course
Morris vs. the course average
A
+8.0
B
−6.3
C
−2.0
D
−2.3
F
+2.7
Difference in percentage points.
2.9% withdrew · 2 of 69 enrolled.
Overall4.64 / 5
53 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.56
Collaboration3.32
Connection4.20
Contribution3.57
Discussion4.32
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.82
Reflection4.90
Respect4.98
Creativity4.79
Feedback4.87
Interaction4.24
Challenge4.86
Questions4.91
Angela Schmitt 33 grades · 1 term 3.42GPA
33 letter grades
Compare with the course
Schmitt vs. the course average
A
−9.0
B
+5.9
C
+7.1
D
+0.7
F
−4.8
Difference in percentage points.
8.3% withdrew · 3 of 36 enrolled.
Overall4.44 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.77
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.31
Collaboration3.27
Connection4.08
Contribution4.38
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity3.92
Grading5.00
Reflection4.31
Respect5.00
Creativity4.83
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.09
Challenge4.62
Questions4.86
Nicholas Oliver Brewer 34 grades · 1 term 3.39GPA
34 letter grades
Compare with the course
Brewer vs. the course average
A
−7.9
B
+8.2
C
+3.8
D
−2.3
F
−1.9
Difference in percentage points.
2.9% withdrew · 1 of 35 enrolled.
Kimia Peykarzadeh 30 grades · 1 term 3.37GPA
30 letter grades
Compare with the course
Peykarzadeh vs. the course average
A
−5.9
B
+4.7
C
−1.7
D
+1.1
F
+1.9
Difference in percentage points.
9.1% withdrew · 3 of 33 enrolled.
Overall4.74 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.89
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.53
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.84
Grading4.52
Reflection4.78
Respect4.89
Creativity4.68
Feedback4.76
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.76
Questions4.94
Mario L Barbosa 62 grades · 1 term 3.31GPA
62 letter grades
Compare with the course
Barbosa vs. the course average
A
−3.2
B
−2.4
C
−0.2
D
+2.6
F
+3.3
Difference in percentage points.
8.8% withdrew · 6 of 68 enrolled.
Overall4.50 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.58
Connection3.87
Contribution4.46
Discussion4.51
Inclusivity3.83
Grading4.15
Reflection4.49
Respect4.82
Creativity4.54
Feedback4.38
Interaction4.56
Challenge4.67
Questions4.58
Ethan Stahl 24 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.65GPA
24 letter grades · Limited sample
4.0% withdrew · 1 of 25 enrolled.
Overall4.78 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.35
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.70
Reflection4.85
Respect4.85
Creativity4.70
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.85
Questions4.85
Carl Jackson Feaster 21 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.63GPA
21 letter grades · Limited sample
4.5% withdrew · 1 of 22 enrolled.
Alejandro M. Cremaschi 23 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.59GPA
23 letter grades · Limited sample
4.2% withdrew · 1 of 24 enrolled.
Overall4.66 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.28
Technology4.97
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration3.86
Connection4.50
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.99
Inclusivity4.47
Grading4.92
Reflection4.45
Respect4.60
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.55
Questions4.97
Yukino Miyake 12 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.45GPA
12 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 12 enrolled.
Er-Hsuan Li 22 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.44GPA
22 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 22 enrolled.
Elizabeth Pearl Strickland 11 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.39GPA
11 letter grades · Limited sample
8.3% withdrew · 1 of 12 enrolled.
Overall3.99 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.81
Technology4.28
Synthesis3.66
Collaboration2.81
Connection3.38
Contribution3.09
Discussion3.28
Inclusivity2.56
Grading3.97
Reflection4.41
Respect4.28
Creativity3.66
Feedback3.34
Interaction4.34
Challenge4.19
Questions4.19
Anastasiia Pavlenko 21 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.10GPA
21 letter grades · Limited sample
8.7% withdrew · 2 of 23 enrolled.
Overall4.37 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology4.77
Synthesis3.96
Collaboration2.96
Connection3.35
Contribution3.91
Discussion3.98
Inclusivity3.04
Grading4.92
Reflection4.33
Respect4.62
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.92
Interaction3.26
Challenge4.35
Questions4.73
Nadia Rodriguez 1 reported responses 2.12Eval / 5
Overall2.12 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Synthesis1.00
Collaboration2.00
Discussion2.00
Grading1.00
Reflection2.00
Respect3.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback1.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge1.00
Questions5.00
Sofia Rivera 3 reported responses 4.98Eval / 5
Overall4.98 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.70
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Nick Brewer 16 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.21
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.21
Connection4.32
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity3.32
Grading4.67
Reflection4.62
Respect4.76
Creativity4.56
Feedback4.81
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.71
Questions4.85
Luca Pompilio 10 reported responses 4.01Eval / 5
Overall4.01 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.16
Technology3.84
Synthesis3.88
Collaboration3.30
Connection2.95
Contribution3.98
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity1.12
Grading4.79
Reflection3.77
Respect3.64
Creativity3.75
Feedback4.32
Interaction5.00
Challenge3.98
Questions4.56
Olivia Nicole Brewer 27 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.82
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration3.53
Connection3.75
Contribution3.91
Discussion4.43
Inclusivity3.63
Grading4.68
Reflection4.52
Respect4.45
Creativity4.26
Feedback4.82
Interaction3.75
Challenge4.48
Questions4.84
Warner Nunez Solano 4 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Gregory Worthley 7 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration2.00
Connection4.30
Contribution4.65
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.93
Reflection4.72
Respect4.95
Creativity4.05
Feedback4.93
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.72
Questions4.95
Tatyana Palmer 3 reported responses 3.39Eval / 5
Overall3.39 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration1.00
Connection2.00
Contribution2.00
Discussion3.00
Inclusivity1.00
Grading4.30
Reflection3.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.30
Interaction1.00
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.