Course record MKTG
MKTG 3350
Marketing Research and Analytics
University of Colorado Boulder
1,477 grades14 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score24/100
Below average
Ozlem Tuba Koc 503 grades · 1 term 3.14GPA
503 letter grades
Compare with the course
Koc vs. the course average
A
+3.4
B
+1.4
C
−3.8
D
−0.7
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
0.6% withdrew · 3 of 506 enrolled.
Overall4.41 / 5
246 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.16
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.97
Connection4.19
Contribution4.46
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.67
Reflection4.36
Respect4.74
Creativity4.01
Feedback4.29
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.45
Questions4.75
Amit Bhattacharjee 219 grades · 1 term 3.08GPA
219 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bhattacharjee vs. the course average
A
−4.8
B
+10.2
C
−3.2
D
−1.7
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
1.8% withdrew · 4 of 223 enrolled.
Overall3.22 / 5
70 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology3.40
Synthesis3.06
Collaboration3.74
Connection3.50
Contribution3.36
Discussion3.62
Inclusivity3.54
Grading2.36
Reflection3.04
Respect4.24
Creativity3.18
Feedback2.26
Interaction4.12
Challenge3.32
Questions2.80
Federico Bumbaca 272 grades · 1 term 2.98GPA
272 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bumbaca vs. the course average
A
−1.9
B
−0.5
C
+1.2
D
−0.2
F
+1.4
Difference in percentage points.
0.4% withdrew · 1 of 273 enrolled.
Overall4.06 / 5
174 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.59
Synthesis3.87
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.13
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.37
Inclusivity3.98
Grading3.92
Reflection4.14
Respect4.54
Creativity4.15
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.48
Challenge4.11
Questions4.50
John G. Lynch 180 grades · 1 term 2.98GPA
180 letter grades
Compare with the course
Lynch vs. the course average
A
−1.1
B
−5.7
C
+8.9
D
−1.7
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
1.6% withdrew · 3 of 183 enrolled.
Overall4.17 / 5
117 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.28
Technology3.95
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.43
Connection4.08
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity3.90
Grading3.63
Reflection4.30
Respect4.48
Creativity4.25
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.57
Challenge4.38
Questions4.35
Margaret T Head 254 grades · 1 term 2.96GPA
254 letter grades
Compare with the course
Head vs. the course average
A
+2.4
B
−8.0
C
+1.8
D
+4.2
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
0.8% withdrew · 2 of 256 enrolled.
Santiago Vicente Ventura Coello 49 grades · 1 term 2.84GPA
49 letter grades
Compare with the course
Coello vs. the course average
A
−11.1
B
+5.0
C
+4.2
D
+0.3
F
+1.6
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 49 enrolled.
Sikena Katrice Rolfe 10 reported responses 4.02Eval / 5
Overall4.02 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.70
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.20
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.30
Reflection4.00
Respect4.20
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.20
Questions4.30
Margaret Winter 29 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.70
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.85
Reflection4.65
Respect4.95
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.65
Questions4.80
Santiago Ventura 8 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.40
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.50
Reflection4.20
Respect4.20
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.20
Questions4.40
Meg Winter 93 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
93 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.66
Technology4.74
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.79
Connection4.70
Contribution4.71
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.79
Reflection4.72
Respect4.91
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.77
Questions4.97
John Anthony Ploumitsakos 8 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.90
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading5.00
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge5.00
Questions4.90
Ying Zeng 115 reported responses 4.01Eval / 5
Overall4.01 / 5
115 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.18
Technology4.27
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration4.14
Connection3.86
Contribution4.26
Discussion4.32
Inclusivity3.93
Grading3.67
Reflection4.13
Respect4.43
Creativity3.89
Feedback3.63
Interaction4.42
Challenge4.15
Questions4.27
Maggie David 14 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.70
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.60
Reflection4.30
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
William Rose 10 reported responses 3.87Eval / 5
Overall3.87 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology4.47
Synthesis4.16
Collaboration3.23
Connection4.46
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.22
Grading4.53
Reflection4.23
Respect4.93
Creativity4.24
Feedback3.93
Interaction4.12
Challenge4.39
Questions4.70
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.