Course record MDST
MDST 3711
Media and Popular Culture
University of Colorado Boulder
1,097 grades21 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score40/100
Mixed record
Joel William Thurman 56 grades · 1 term 3.85GPA
56 letter grades
Compare with the course
Thurman vs. the course average
A
+39.9
B
−25.2
C
−8.9
D
−2.5
F
−3.4
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 56 enrolled.
Overall4.66 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.90
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.45
Reflection4.70
Respect4.95
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Rory Bledsoe 30 grades · 1 term 3.73GPA
30 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bledsoe vs. the course average
A
+32.4
B
−15.9
C
−10.7
D
−2.5
F
−3.4
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 30 enrolled.
Overall4.82 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.90
Connection5.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.40
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.60
Shaylynn Lynch Lesinski 30 grades · 1 term 3.67GPA
30 letter grades
Compare with the course
Lesinski vs. the course average
A
+22.4
B
−5.9
C
−10.7
D
−2.5
F
−3.4
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 30 enrolled.
Overall4.98 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Matthew Dale Pickard 29 grades · 1 term 3.67GPA
29 letter grades
Compare with the course
Pickard vs. the course average
A
+35.2
B
−29.0
C
−3.8
D
−2.5
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 29 enrolled.
Overall4.72 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.71
Collaboration3.61
Connection4.90
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.76
Grading4.60
Reflection4.76
Respect4.81
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.34
Challenge4.61
Questions4.88
Ully Damari Putri 49 grades · 1 term 3.30GPA
49 letter grades
Compare with the course
Putri vs. the course average
A
+9.6
B
−7.3
C
−0.5
D
−0.4
F
−1.3
Difference in percentage points.
2.0% withdrew · 1 of 50 enrolled.
Overall4.26 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.48
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity4.91
Grading4.45
Reflection4.62
Respect4.75
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.68
Questions4.29
Talia Aygun 56 grades · 1 term 3.22GPA
56 letter grades
Compare with the course
Aygun vs. the course average
A
+11.3
B
−10.9
C
−1.7
D
−0.7
F
+2.0
Difference in percentage points.
1.8% withdrew · 1 of 57 enrolled.
Overall4.59 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.75
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.55
Reflection4.45
Respect4.95
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.45
Questions4.80
Kevan Feshami 28 grades · 1 term 3.18GPA
28 letter grades
Compare with the course
Feshami vs. the course average
A
+23.8
B
−28.8
C
−7.1
D
+1.1
F
+10.9
Difference in percentage points.
6.7% withdrew · 2 of 30 enrolled.
Overall4.95 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.90
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Cassandra Dana 28 grades · 1 term 3.18GPA
28 letter grades
Compare with the course
Dana vs. the course average
A
+16.7
B
−25.2
C
+3.6
D
+1.1
F
+3.8
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 28 enrolled.
Ediz Ozelkan 348 grades · 1 term 3.17GPA
348 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ozelkan vs. the course average
A
+0.1
B
−0.9
C
+0.3
D
+0.1
F
+0.4
Difference in percentage points.
3.9% withdrew · 14 of 362 enrolled.
Overall4.63 / 5
158 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.54
Technology4.86
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration3.72
Connection4.70
Contribution4.66
Discussion4.51
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.74
Reflection4.68
Respect4.67
Creativity4.74
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.39
Challenge4.68
Questions4.60
Anat Leshnick 340 grades · 1 term 3.08GPA
340 letter grades
Compare with the course
Leshnick vs. the course average
A
−14.6
B
+16.1
C
−0.7
D
−0.1
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
1.4% withdrew · 5 of 345 enrolled.
Overall4.33 / 5
152 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.64
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.24
Connection4.89
Contribution4.86
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.74
Grading4.32
Reflection4.74
Respect4.76
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.27
Interaction4.47
Challenge4.72
Questions4.11
Rachel Lara Van Der Merwe 35 grades · 1 term 3.07GPA
35 letter grades
Compare with the course
Merwe vs. the course average
A
−1.9
B
−4.5
C
+3.6
D
+6.1
F
−3.4
Difference in percentage points.
10.3% withdrew · 4 of 39 enrolled.
Arthur Bamford 68 grades · 1 term 2.58GPA
68 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bamford vs. the course average
A
−31.4
B
+5.3
C
+21.7
D
+2.0
F
+2.5
Difference in percentage points.
2.9% withdrew · 2 of 70 enrolled.
Overall4.54 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.75
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.45
Questions4.65
Samira Rajabi 10 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.97
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.97
Collaboration4.96
Connection4.98
Contribution4.97
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.91
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.96
Feedback4.04
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.98
Questions5.00
Charlie Dana 6 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.80
Questions4.70
Hibah Ahmad 19 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.74
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.77
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity4.81
Grading4.24
Reflection4.74
Respect4.81
Creativity4.74
Feedback4.06
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.74
Questions4.61
Olga White 33 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.24
Synthesis4.24
Collaboration4.03
Connection4.52
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.42
Inclusivity4.47
Grading3.93
Reflection4.01
Respect4.22
Creativity4.07
Feedback3.72
Interaction4.36
Challenge4.18
Questions4.08
Rachel Ramlawi 9 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration3.90
Connection5.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.80
Reflection5.00
Respect4.60
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.60
Questions5.00
Iris Ghatak 11 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.90
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.80
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Victoria Elisabeth Pihl S<F8>Rensen 10 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.60
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.90
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Dina Dorari 1 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Julie Renee Estlick 8 reported responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.90
Contribution3.80
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.40
Reflection4.10
Respect4.10
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.50
Questions3.90
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.