Course record MDST
MDST 1001
Foundations of Media Studies
University of Colorado Boulder
834 grades25 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score29/100
Below average
Sandra Ristovska 485 grades · 1 term 2.98GPA
485 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ristovska vs. the course average
A
−1.0
B
+1.2
C
+0.3
D
same
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
3.0% withdrew · 15 of 500 enrolled.
Overall4.51 / 5
362 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.54
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration3.35
Connection4.93
Contribution4.21
Discussion4.59
Inclusivity4.33
Grading4.29
Reflection4.91
Respect4.96
Creativity4.17
Feedback4.76
Interaction4.57
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Anna Colleen Turner 294 grades · 1 term 2.96GPA
294 letter grades
Compare with the course
Turner vs. the course average
A
+1.4
B
−0.9
C
−0.5
D
−0.7
F
+0.7
Difference in percentage points.
2.6% withdrew · 8 of 302 enrolled.
Overall4.35 / 5
90 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.86
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.79
Collaboration4.11
Connection4.81
Contribution4.74
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.95
Grading4.81
Reflection4.81
Respect4.91
Creativity4.79
Feedback4.69
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.79
Questions4.81
Arthur Bamford 55 grades · 1 term 2.93GPA
55 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bamford vs. the course average
A
+1.5
B
−6.1
C
+0.4
D
+3.2
F
+1.0
Difference in percentage points.
3.5% withdrew · 2 of 57 enrolled.
Overall4.33 / 5
72 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.41
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration3.79
Connection4.60
Contribution4.09
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity4.71
Grading4.59
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.18
Interaction4.41
Challenge4.60
Questions4.50
Joel William Thurman 13 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.54
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration4.58
Connection4.85
Contribution4.74
Discussion4.76
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.31
Reflection4.88
Respect4.88
Creativity4.23
Feedback3.92
Interaction4.69
Challenge4.26
Questions4.69
Mark Edward Fairbrother 13 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.60
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.55
Reflection4.35
Respect4.85
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.75
Questions4.60
Brady Cullen Mcdonough 21 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.54
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.69
Connection4.77
Contribution4.52
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.88
Reflection4.88
Respect4.77
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.58
Questions4.92
Emma Joy Lawrence 19 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.90
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.75
Reflection4.95
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.90
Questions4.60
Audrey Michaela Mayes 18 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.74
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration4.51
Connection4.90
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity4.94
Grading4.49
Reflection4.79
Respect4.96
Creativity4.56
Feedback4.36
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.52
Questions4.68
Chiamaka Nneoma Keren-Happuch Odinenu 22 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.82
Technology4.56
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.81
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity4.89
Grading4.59
Reflection4.80
Respect4.87
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.79
Questions4.65
Katie Lynn Schwind 2 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.50
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Briah Baker 37 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.17
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.53
Contribution4.03
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.53
Grading3.90
Reflection4.27
Respect4.70
Creativity4.13
Feedback3.87
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.03
Questions4.30
Hibah Ahmad 36 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.63
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.70
Reflection4.77
Respect4.73
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.63
Questions4.80
Autumn Tyler 17 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.60
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.45
Reflection4.50
Respect4.85
Creativity3.85
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.25
Questions4.70
Dina Dorari 20 reported responses 3.76Eval / 5
Overall3.76 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.35
Technology4.05
Synthesis3.55
Collaboration3.55
Connection3.80
Contribution3.60
Discussion3.85
Inclusivity4.20
Grading3.75
Reflection3.70
Respect4.40
Creativity3.55
Feedback3.20
Interaction4.25
Challenge3.90
Questions4.10
Olga White 36 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.51
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.76
Contribution4.56
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.28
Reflection4.73
Respect4.78
Creativity4.38
Feedback4.26
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.49
Questions4.50
Stephanie Abdalla 29 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.29
Connection4.65
Contribution4.59
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.89
Grading4.69
Reflection4.87
Respect4.87
Creativity4.54
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.51
Questions4.78
Connor Mchale 24 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.85
Connection4.60
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.55
Reflection4.45
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.45
Questions4.50
Tara Coughlin 11 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.40
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.55
Reflection4.50
Respect4.75
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.30
Questions4.60
Warren Liu 67 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
67 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.47
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration4.15
Connection4.47
Contribution4.21
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.56
Reflection4.41
Respect4.59
Creativity4.39
Feedback4.07
Interaction4.47
Challenge4.42
Questions4.51
Oisin Sheerin 61 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
61 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.74
Collaboration4.46
Connection4.75
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.84
Grading4.78
Reflection4.79
Respect4.87
Creativity4.68
Feedback4.66
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.77
Questions4.83
Victoria Elisabeth Pihl S<F8>Rensen 134 reported responses 3.95Eval / 5
Overall3.95 / 5
134 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.43
Synthesis3.98
Collaboration3.83
Connection4.51
Contribution3.96
Discussion4.31
Inclusivity4.71
Grading4.01
Reflection4.18
Respect4.65
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.28
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.05
Questions4.18
Quinn Peterson 45 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5
45 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.16
Collaboration4.33
Connection4.57
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.72
Grading4.19
Reflection4.52
Respect4.60
Creativity4.11
Feedback4.08
Interaction4.51
Challenge4.25
Questions4.42
Shitong Li 23 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.45
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.00
Reflection4.50
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.20
Questions4.35
Sierra Rodriguez 38 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.40
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.15
Reflection4.55
Respect4.75
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.40
Questions4.60
Emma Mccormick 7 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.30
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity3.70
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.30
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.