Course record MCDB
MCDB 3140
Cell Biology Laboratory
University of Colorado Boulder
828 grades24 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score69/100
Strong
Cheryl Ann Pinzone 99 grades · 1 term 3.77GPA
99 letter grades
Compare with the course
Pinzone vs. the course average
A
+9.4
B
−4.1
C
−2.6
D
−0.4
F
−2.3
Difference in percentage points.
2.0% withdrew · 2 of 101 enrolled.
Overall4.56 / 5
71 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.60
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.70
Reflection4.60
Respect4.70
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.50
Questions4.70
Alison Jane Vigers 95 grades · 1 term 3.62GPA
95 letter grades
Compare with the course
Vigers vs. the course average
A
−2.9
B
+4.9
C
−0.4
D
−0.4
F
−1.2
Difference in percentage points.
2.1% withdrew · 2 of 97 enrolled.
Kristin Moore 634 grades · 1 term 3.52GPA
634 letter grades
Compare with the course
Moore vs. the course average
A
−1.0
B
−0.1
C
+0.5
D
+0.1
F
+0.5
Difference in percentage points.
1.7% withdrew · 11 of 645 enrolled.
Overall4.69 / 5
518 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.68
Contribution4.61
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity4.02
Grading4.78
Reflection4.72
Respect4.86
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.78
Questions4.86
Erin Rose Taylor 14 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.88
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.88
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.98
Contribution4.82
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.91
Reflection4.91
Respect4.93
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.63
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.86
Questions4.88
Elise Barteld 24 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.86
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.88
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.53
Contribution4.83
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.98
Reflection4.78
Respect4.85
Creativity4.86
Feedback4.98
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.95
Questions4.98
Andrew Lee 39 reported responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.83
Technology4.96
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration4.94
Connection4.86
Contribution4.93
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity4.13
Grading4.94
Reflection4.70
Respect4.94
Creativity4.83
Feedback4.96
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.91
Questions4.87
Gregory Lee Maas 20 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.88
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.62
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity4.92
Grading4.78
Reflection4.65
Respect4.93
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.88
Questions4.90
Stella Nichol Koliavas 31 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.82
Technology4.92
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.86
Connection4.75
Contribution4.71
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.36
Grading4.69
Reflection4.90
Respect4.99
Creativity4.69
Feedback4.97
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.88
Questions4.99
Darya Tarasivna Poliyenko 15 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.48
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.41
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity4.28
Grading4.68
Reflection4.71
Respect4.71
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.68
Questions4.86
Olivia Marie Delletorri 18 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.50
Contribution4.72
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.22
Grading4.65
Reflection4.80
Respect4.75
Creativity4.61
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.88
Questions4.85
Mark Matyas 20 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.25
Contribution4.72
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.02
Grading4.72
Reflection4.67
Respect4.98
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.78
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.77
Ryan Sayegh 7 reported responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.70
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.40
Grading5.00
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Zachary Sky Hazlett 11 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.80
Reflection5.00
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Chelsea Drown 13 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.40
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.80
Respect4.60
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.90
Challenge5.00
Questions4.60
Chance Sine 12 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.50
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.60
Questions5.00
Erin O'Connor 7 reported responses 4.93Eval / 5
Overall4.93 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.90
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.90
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Michaela Mccright 11 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.10
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.70
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Jason Flint 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Kerrie Elizabeth Macmillan 18 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.83
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.75
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.33
Grading4.85
Reflection4.88
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.92
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.78
Questions4.92
Nick Johnson 9 reported responses 4.98Eval / 5
Overall4.98 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Nishanth Narayan 13 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.80
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Waverly Gebhardt 8 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.20
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.40
Questions4.90
Conor Mchugh 6 reported responses 4.93Eval / 5
Overall4.93 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Chelsea Marie Toner 223 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
223 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.66
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.46
Contribution4.66
Discussion4.76
Inclusivity3.78
Grading4.68
Reflection4.68
Respect4.80
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.48
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.66
Questions4.80
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.