Course record MATH
MATH 3140
Abstract Algebra 1
University of Colorado Boulder
227 grades14 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score23/100
Below average
Sebastian Ben Casalaina-Martin 35 grades · 1 term 3.11GPA
35 letter grades
Compare with the course
Casalaina-Martin vs. the course average
A
+5.4
B
+8.3
C
−9.5
D
−2.2
F
−2.0
Difference in percentage points.
5.4% withdrew · 2 of 37 enrolled.
Overall4.68 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.74
Technology4.11
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.93
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.82
Reflection4.82
Respect4.91
Creativity4.52
Feedback4.61
Interaction4.39
Challenge4.94
Questions4.84
Peter Mayr 41 grades · 1 term 2.95GPA
41 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mayr vs. the course average
A
+0.7
B
−4.0
C
+8.8
D
−2.2
F
−3.3
Difference in percentage points.
8.9% withdrew · 4 of 45 enrolled.
Overall4.32 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.61
Collaboration3.09
Connection4.38
Contribution4.39
Discussion4.49
Inclusivity4.18
Grading4.29
Reflection4.20
Respect4.22
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.41
Interaction4.09
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Richard Mutegeki Green 29 grades · 1 term 2.59GPA
29 letter grades
Compare with the course
Green vs. the course average
A
−8.7
B
+1.6
C
−4.3
D
+11.6
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
9.4% withdrew · 3 of 32 enrolled.
Overall4.28 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology3.54
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration2.90
Connection3.80
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.89
Grading4.52
Reflection4.65
Respect4.35
Creativity4.23
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.85
Questions4.71
Florencia Orosz 21 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.46GPA
21 letter grades · Limited sample
12.5% withdrew · 3 of 24 enrolled.
Overall4.63 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.70
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Franz Nathaniel Thiem 17 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.16GPA
17 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 17 enrolled.
Overall4.32 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.22
Technology3.98
Synthesis4.29
Collaboration4.72
Connection2.41
Contribution4.17
Discussion4.38
Inclusivity3.42
Grading4.26
Reflection4.58
Respect4.41
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.71
Challenge4.71
Questions4.48
David R Grant 20 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.99GPA
20 letter grades · Limited sample
16.7% withdrew · 4 of 24 enrolled.
Agnes Erzsebet Szendrei 23 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.51GPA
23 letter grades · Limited sample
11.5% withdrew · 3 of 26 enrolled.
Overall3.81 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.50
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.50
Connection2.10
Contribution3.00
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.80
Reflection4.00
Respect4.80
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.20
Questions4.20
Marcos Mazari Armida 22 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.48GPA
22 letter grades · Limited sample
8.3% withdrew · 2 of 24 enrolled.
Overall4.30 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.90
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.80
Connection3.50
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.60
Reflection4.30
Respect4.30
Creativity4.70
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.40
Sheagan Abdallah Karan Arlene John 19 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.44GPA
19 letter grades · Limited sample
13.6% withdrew · 3 of 22 enrolled.
Overall4.26 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology3.70
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.00
Respect4.60
Creativity3.80
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.30
Questions4.50
Mengxiao Sun 4 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.70
Connection5.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Grading4.50
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.70
Challenge5.00
Questions4.80
Michael B Noyes 4 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.30
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Charlotte Aten 7 reported responses 3.57Eval / 5
Overall3.57 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology2.80
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration1.80
Connection2.00
Contribution3.10
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity1.50
Grading3.00
Reflection3.70
Respect4.20
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.00
Questions3.70
Justin Barhite 8 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.30
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.90
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Keith Kearnes 7 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.30
Connection4.20
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.70
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.