Course record MATH
MATH 2135
Introduction to Linear Algebra for Mathematics Majors
University of Colorado Boulder
376 grades19 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score28/100
Below average
Agnes France Marie Beaudry 66 grades · 1 term 3.39GPA
66 letter grades
Compare with the course
Beaudry vs. the course average
A
+16.4
B
−1.8
C
−9.8
D
−3.5
F
−1.2
Difference in percentage points.
5.7% withdrew · 4 of 70 enrolled.
Overall4.58 / 5
81 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.74
Collaboration4.73
Connection3.36
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.59
Reflection4.34
Respect4.88
Creativity4.23
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.77
Questions4.55
Keith Kearnes 25 grades · 1 term 3.24GPA
25 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kearnes vs. the course average
A
+2.3
B
+13.9
C
−10.9
D
−5.1
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 25 enrolled.
Overall4.38 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.10
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.50
Reflection4.60
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Jonathan S Wise 33 grades · 1 term 3.09GPA
33 letter grades
Compare with the course
Wise vs. the course average
A
−15.4
B
+25.5
C
−3.7
D
−2.0
F
−4.3
Difference in percentage points.
2.9% withdrew · 1 of 34 enrolled.
Richard Mutegeki Green 32 grades · 1 term 3.06GPA
32 letter grades
Compare with the course
Green vs. the course average
A
+4.3
B
−7.3
C
+3.0
D
+1.2
F
−1.1
Difference in percentage points.
8.6% withdrew · 3 of 35 enrolled.
Overall4.27 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology3.60
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration3.23
Connection3.47
Contribution4.42
Discussion4.51
Inclusivity3.66
Grading4.53
Reflection4.29
Respect4.70
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.42
Interaction4.09
Challenge4.58
Questions4.65
Robin John Deeley 30 grades · 1 term 2.87GPA
30 letter grades
Compare with the course
Deeley vs. the course average
A
+10.9
B
−16.1
C
−5.5
D
+4.9
F
+5.7
Difference in percentage points.
9.1% withdrew · 3 of 33 enrolled.
Overall4.44 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection4.30
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.70
Interaction3.70
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Marcos Mazari Armida 33 grades · 1 term 2.87GPA
33 letter grades
Compare with the course
Armida vs. the course average
A
−9.4
B
+1.2
C
+11.4
D
−5.1
F
+1.8
Difference in percentage points.
10.8% withdrew · 4 of 37 enrolled.
Overall4.25 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.10
Connection3.20
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity2.70
Grading4.30
Reflection4.40
Respect4.20
Creativity4.70
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
Tianyuan Xu 48 grades · 1 term 2.23GPA
48 letter grades
Compare with the course
Xu vs. the course average
A
−20.7
B
−9.4
C
+12.4
D
+13.7
F
+4.1
Difference in percentage points.
5.9% withdrew · 3 of 51 enrolled.
Overall4.24 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration2.80
Connection2.80
Contribution2.80
Discussion4.70
Grading4.50
Reflection4.30
Respect5.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Peter D Elliott 21 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.97GPA
21 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 21 enrolled.
Overall4.37 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology2.20
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.50
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.20
Reflection4.40
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.10
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.40
Sarah Petersen 18 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.03GPA
18 letter grades · Limited sample
5.3% withdrew · 1 of 19 enrolled.
Overall4.39 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.54
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.79
Connection3.73
Contribution4.52
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity3.18
Grading4.28
Reflection4.44
Respect4.91
Creativity4.64
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.73
Questions4.89
Sebastian Ben Casalaina-Martin 17 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.02GPA
17 letter grades · Limited sample
19.0% withdrew · 4 of 21 enrolled.
Overall4.38 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.90
Connection3.40
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.40
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.60
Questions4.40
Yining Zhang 22 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.00GPA
22 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 22 enrolled.
Overall3.34 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology2.70
Synthesis3.20
Collaboration2.00
Connection2.60
Contribution3.00
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.00
Reflection2.80
Respect4.00
Creativity3.00
Feedback3.30
Interaction3.00
Challenge3.30
Questions3.70
David R Grant 17 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.86GPA
17 letter grades · Limited sample
10.5% withdrew · 2 of 19 enrolled.
Overall4.93 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.80
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Sheagan Abdallah Karan Arlene John 14 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.86GPA
14 letter grades · Limited sample
6.7% withdrew · 1 of 15 enrolled.
Overall4.15 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology1.50
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity1.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.70
Respect4.30
Creativity5.00
Feedback3.70
Interaction3.70
Challenge5.00
Questions4.30
Xingzhou Yang 2 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Braden Loil Balentine 10 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Jun S Hong 11 reported responses 4.04Eval / 5
Overall4.04 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.70
Connection3.00
Contribution3.50
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity2.60
Grading3.80
Reflection4.30
Respect4.50
Creativity4.70
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.70
Questions4.30
Peter Mayr 18 reported responses 4.07Eval / 5
Overall4.07 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.18
Technology3.54
Synthesis4.08
Collaboration2.71
Connection3.48
Contribution4.38
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity3.32
Grading3.90
Reflection4.36
Respect4.62
Creativity4.09
Feedback3.79
Interaction4.09
Challenge4.45
Questions4.52
Chindu Mohanakumar 7 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration3.30
Connection3.50
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.70
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Michael B Noyes 4 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.20
Connection3.20
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.20
Reflection4.50
Respect4.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.