Course record JRNL
JRNL 4002
Reporting 2
University of Colorado Boulder
261 grades16 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score63/100
Strong
Mushfique Wadud 53 grades · 1 term 3.77GPA
53 letter grades
Compare with the course
Wadud vs. the course average
A
+10.6
B
−5.2
C
−3.5
D
−0.4
F
−1.5
Difference in percentage points.
1.9% withdrew · 1 of 54 enrolled.
Overall4.12 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.27
Technology3.79
Synthesis3.67
Collaboration4.34
Connection3.27
Contribution4.56
Discussion4.23
Inclusivity4.24
Grading3.43
Reflection3.43
Respect4.48
Creativity3.00
Feedback3.53
Interaction4.41
Challenge3.68
Questions3.95
Chuck Frederick Plunkett 44 grades · 1 term 3.60GPA
44 letter grades
Compare with the course
Plunkett vs. the course average
A
same
B
+5.1
C
−3.1
D
−0.4
F
−1.5
Difference in percentage points.
4.3% withdrew · 2 of 46 enrolled.
Overall4.52 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.83
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.79
Collaboration4.03
Connection4.93
Contribution4.69
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.83
Grading4.13
Reflection4.76
Respect4.81
Creativity4.93
Feedback4.92
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.82
Questions4.83
Amanda Katie Clark 50 grades · 1 term 3.50GPA
50 letter grades
Compare with the course
Clark vs. the course average
A
+3.5
B
−6.2
C
+2.6
D
−0.4
F
+0.5
Difference in percentage points.
3.8% withdrew · 2 of 52 enrolled.
Overall4.90 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.91
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.93
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.95
Contribution4.95
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.98
Grading4.95
Reflection4.95
Respect4.98
Creativity4.98
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.95
Questions4.95
Dana Kay Coffield 27 grades · 1 term 3.25GPA
27 letter grades
Compare with the course
Coffield vs. the course average
A
−14.9
B
+3.7
C
+9.5
D
−0.4
F
+2.2
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 27 enrolled.
Overall4.31 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.10
Connection4.60
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading3.80
Reflection3.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.30
Questions4.60
Bradley S Cochi 12 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
12 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 12 enrolled.
Overall4.74 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.30
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.30
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.00
Hillary M Rosner 13 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.85GPA
13 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 13 enrolled.
Overall4.76 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.50
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.50
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.80
Questions4.70
Jason Plautz 19 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.42GPA
19 letter grades · Limited sample
5.0% withdrew · 1 of 20 enrolled.
Overall4.83 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.88
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.92
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.95
Reflection4.73
Respect4.90
Creativity4.92
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.67
Questions5.00
Elizabeth Skewes Cummings 15 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.39GPA
15 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 15 enrolled.
Susan Kathleen Moran 11 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.34GPA
11 letter grades · Limited sample
21.4% withdrew · 3 of 14 enrolled.
Ashley Carter 17 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.02GPA
17 letter grades · Limited sample
5.6% withdrew · 1 of 18 enrolled.
Overall4.92 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Michael Joseph Mcdevitt 2 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.00
Respect4.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Elizabeth A Skewes 13 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.40
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.60
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Moe K Clark 12 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.80
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Rania Ms Al Namara 6 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.30
Reflection4.30
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Carl Knauf 19 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.88
Contribution4.91
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.88
Reflection4.71
Respect4.80
Creativity4.98
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.85
Questions4.90
Victoria Elizabeth Sama 10 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.90
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.10
Reflection4.70
Respect4.60
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.80
Questions4.40
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.