Course record JRNL
JRNL 3651
Media Law and Ethics
University of Colorado Boulder
1,905 grades26 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score44/100
Mixed record
Miles Patrick Davis 35 grades · 1 term 3.83GPA
35 letter grades
Compare with the course
Davis vs. the course average
A
+34.7
B
−25.2
C
−7.2
D
−1.2
F
−1.0
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 35 enrolled.
Overall4.32 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.70
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.70
Reflection4.10
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback3.90
Interaction3.90
Challenge4.50
Questions4.70
Muhammad Fahad Humayun 37 grades · 1 term 3.83GPA
37 letter grades
Compare with the course
Humayun vs. the course average
A
+35.2
B
−28.4
C
−7.2
D
−1.2
F
+1.7
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 37 enrolled.
Success Nosakhare Osayi 30 grades · 1 term 3.80GPA
30 letter grades
Compare with the course
Osayi vs. the course average
A
+33.3
B
−23.8
C
−7.2
D
−1.2
F
−1.0
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 30 enrolled.
Overall4.27 / 5
85 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.56
Technology4.29
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration4.52
Connection4.66
Contribution4.56
Discussion4.51
Inclusivity4.44
Grading3.91
Reflection4.53
Respect4.39
Creativity4.32
Feedback3.97
Interaction4.52
Challenge4.34
Questions4.05
Carlos Eduardo Back Vianna 62 grades · 1 term 3.77GPA
62 letter grades
Compare with the course
Vianna vs. the course average
A
+22.3
B
−14.5
C
−5.6
D
−1.2
F
−1.0
Difference in percentage points.
3.1% withdrew · 2 of 64 enrolled.
Overall4.53 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration3.65
Connection4.78
Contribution4.17
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.63
Grading4.69
Reflection4.50
Respect4.88
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.58
Questions4.85
Thomas H Yulsman 402 grades · 1 term 3.64GPA
402 letter grades
Compare with the course
Yulsman vs. the course average
A
+20.9
B
−16.9
C
−4.8
D
+0.3
F
+0.4
Difference in percentage points.
0.7% withdrew · 3 of 405 enrolled.
Sima R Bhowmik 74 grades · 1 term 3.61GPA
74 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bhowmik vs. the course average
A
+21.7
B
−16.2
C
−4.5
D
−1.2
F
+0.3
Difference in percentage points.
1.3% withdrew · 1 of 75 enrolled.
Overall4.35 / 5
63 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.41
Technology4.34
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration3.87
Connection4.39
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.41
Reflection4.34
Respect4.87
Creativity4.45
Feedback3.86
Interaction4.66
Challenge4.52
Questions4.70
Nicola Jana Redl 64 grades · 1 term 3.58GPA
64 letter grades
Compare with the course
Redl vs. the course average
A
+10.5
B
−4.1
C
−4.1
D
−1.2
F
−1.0
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 64 enrolled.
Tara G Walker 54 grades · 1 term 3.38GPA
54 letter grades
Compare with the course
Walker vs. the course average
A
+0.7
B
+1.4
C
−3.5
D
+0.6
F
+0.8
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 54 enrolled.
Angelica Lolita Kalika 259 grades · 1 term 3.36GPA
259 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kalika vs. the course average
A
−7.3
B
+7.9
C
+1.6
D
−1.2
F
−1.0
Difference in percentage points.
0.4% withdrew · 1 of 260 enrolled.
Overall4.45 / 5
62 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.17
Collaboration3.83
Connection5.00
Contribution4.42
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.96
Grading4.41
Reflection4.60
Respect4.99
Creativity4.66
Feedback4.06
Interaction4.44
Challenge4.42
Questions4.63
Kathleen Marie Ryan 40 grades · 1 term 3.36GPA
40 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ryan vs. the course average
A
+0.8
B
+1.2
C
−4.7
D
−1.2
F
+4.0
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 40 enrolled.
Overall4.70 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.49
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.22
Connection4.95
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.69
Reflection4.42
Respect4.62
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.62
Questions4.85
Gregory Zunda Gondwe 117 grades · 1 term 3.32GPA
117 letter grades
Compare with the course
Gondwe vs. the course average
A
−5.4
B
+5.5
C
+0.4
D
+0.5
F
−1.0
Difference in percentage points.
0.8% withdrew · 1 of 118 enrolled.
Overall3.47 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.12
Technology2.83
Synthesis3.46
Collaboration3.34
Connection3.11
Contribution4.32
Discussion3.21
Inclusivity4.71
Grading2.53
Reflection2.60
Respect3.94
Creativity4.33
Feedback2.31
Interaction4.13
Challenge3.08
Questions2.90
Carol Y Anderson-Reinhardt 66 grades · 1 term 3.26GPA
66 letter grades
Compare with the course
Anderson-Reinhardt vs. the course average
A
−14.3
B
+11.6
C
+1.8
D
+1.8
F
−1.0
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 66 enrolled.
Overall4.62 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.92
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.24
Connection4.75
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.59
Reflection4.67
Respect5.00
Creativity4.32
Feedback3.99
Interaction4.59
Challenge4.38
Questions4.77
Beth A Potter 93 grades · 1 term 3.23GPA
93 letter grades
Compare with the course
Potter vs. the course average
A
−20.1
B
+17.8
C
+4.6
D
−1.2
F
−1.0
Difference in percentage points.
1.1% withdrew · 1 of 94 enrolled.
Victoria Elizabeth Sama 495 grades · 1 term 3.16GPA
495 letter grades
Compare with the course
Sama vs. the course average
A
−17.1
B
+11.2
C
+4.5
D
+1.0
F
+0.4
Difference in percentage points.
2.4% withdrew · 12 of 507 enrolled.
Overall4.59 / 5
531 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.74
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.26
Connection4.89
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.78
Grading4.67
Reflection4.78
Respect4.85
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.77
Questions4.83
Matt Reichel 44 grades · 1 term 3.07GPA
44 letter grades
Compare with the course
Reichel vs. the course average
A
−20.3
B
+9.4
C
+10.9
D
−1.2
F
+1.2
Difference in percentage points.
2.2% withdrew · 1 of 45 enrolled.
Overall4.11 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration2.80
Connection4.50
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.00
Reflection3.80
Respect4.50
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.00
Questions4.20
Kayli Plotner 33 grades · 1 term 2.91GPA
33 letter grades
Compare with the course
Plotner vs. the course average
A
−29.4
B
+17.7
C
+7.9
D
+1.8
F
+2.0
Difference in percentage points.
5.7% withdrew · 2 of 35 enrolled.
Overall4.39 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.79
Technology4.74
Synthesis4.79
Collaboration4.63
Connection4.74
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.61
Reflection4.79
Respect4.87
Creativity4.66
Feedback3.76
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.22
Questions3.79
Elizabeth Potter 104 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5
104 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.21
Technology3.83
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration3.43
Connection4.51
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity4.35
Grading3.82
Reflection3.74
Respect4.64
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.55
Challenge3.90
Questions3.68
Tom Yulsman 128 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
128 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.38
Synthesis4.11
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.68
Contribution4.11
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.53
Reflection4.39
Respect4.68
Creativity4.13
Feedback3.77
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.30
Questions4.53
Tamm Matthews 48 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
48 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.90
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.00
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.10
Questions4.50
Fahad Humayun 11 reported responses 3.87Eval / 5
Overall3.87 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.50
Contribution3.90
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.50
Reflection4.30
Respect4.50
Creativity4.20
Feedback2.90
Interaction3.80
Challenge4.30
Questions3.60
Nicky Redl 44 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology3.63
Synthesis4.14
Collaboration4.37
Connection4.36
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.31
Grading3.89
Reflection4.12
Respect4.52
Creativity3.86
Feedback3.68
Interaction4.18
Challenge4.33
Questions4.35
Ashley Carter 15 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.95
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.95
Collaboration4.79
Connection4.95
Contribution4.86
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.91
Grading4.88
Reflection4.98
Respect5.00
Creativity4.92
Feedback4.92
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.97
Questions4.97
Nihal Alaqabawy 5 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.60
Connection5.00
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Muhammad Ali 19 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.70
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.50
Reflection4.60
Respect4.70
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Erica Hunzinger 47 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
47 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.21
Connection4.91
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.76
Grading4.76
Reflection4.72
Respect4.91
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.79
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.79
Questions4.88
Dennis Okeke 5 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.80
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.