Course record JRNL
JRNL 2001
Multimedia Reporting Technologies
University of Colorado Boulder
513 grades17 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score35/100
Below average
Paul J Daugherty 114 grades · 1 term 3.33GPA
114 letter grades
Compare with the course
Daugherty vs. the course average
A
−3.0
B
−0.1
C
+4.3
D
−0.8
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
5.8% withdrew · 7 of 121 enrolled.
Overall4.24 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.38
Contribution4.38
Discussion4.56
Inclusivity4.18
Grading4.58
Reflection4.55
Respect4.51
Creativity4.78
Feedback4.64
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.67
Questions4.76
Thomas R Mustin 265 grades · 1 term 3.31GPA
265 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mustin vs. the course average
A
−4.8
B
+7.8
C
−2.0
D
+0.4
F
−1.4
Difference in percentage points.
3.6% withdrew · 10 of 275 enrolled.
Overall4.15 / 5
144 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.11
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.41
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.10
Grading3.59
Reflection4.13
Respect4.31
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.04
Interaction4.57
Challenge4.13
Questions4.05
Keely Kernan 11 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
11 letter grades · Limited sample
8.3% withdrew · 1 of 12 enrolled.
Overall4.81 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.90
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading5.00
Reflection4.40
Respect4.90
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.80
Challenge5.00
Questions4.90
Patrick Ryan Clark 20 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.95GPA
20 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 20 enrolled.
David Ross Taylor 20 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.69GPA
20 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 20 enrolled.
Muhammad Fahad Humayun 15 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.69GPA
15 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 15 enrolled.
Overall4.54 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration3.52
Connection4.91
Contribution4.56
Discussion4.64
Inclusivity4.71
Grading4.75
Reflection4.68
Respect4.78
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.71
Questions4.80
Hun Shik Kim 15 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.18GPA
15 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 15 enrolled.
Overall4.87 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.90
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.90
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Elias Zachary Imadali 19 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.12GPA
19 letter grades · Limited sample
5.0% withdrew · 1 of 20 enrolled.
Overall4.60 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.40
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.60
Reflection4.30
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions5.00
Kayli Plotner 16 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.90GPA
16 letter grades · Limited sample
11.1% withdrew · 2 of 18 enrolled.
Overall4.79 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.91
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.81
Contribution4.72
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity4.99
Grading4.61
Reflection4.61
Respect4.90
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.90
Questions4.72
Kathleen Inez Alaimo 18 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.66GPA
18 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 18 enrolled.
Overall4.06 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.60
Reflection4.10
Respect4.40
Creativity4.60
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.20
Questions3.90
Ross Taylor 15 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.90
Reflection4.80
Respect4.70
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Angelica Lolita Kalika 89 reported responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5
89 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.96
Technology4.18
Synthesis3.99
Collaboration3.85
Connection4.41
Contribution4.06
Discussion4.36
Inclusivity4.58
Grading3.59
Reflection3.80
Respect4.62
Creativity3.79
Feedback3.29
Interaction4.34
Challenge3.93
Questions4.16
Lawrence David Murphey 11 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.90
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.60
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
Qiongye Chen 19 reported responses 4.03Eval / 5
Overall4.03 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.48
Technology3.84
Synthesis3.93
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.90
Contribution4.00
Discussion3.95
Inclusivity3.88
Grading3.77
Reflection3.91
Respect4.28
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.11
Interaction4.41
Challenge4.08
Questions3.90
Wen Lei 13 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.42
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.82
Reflection4.18
Respect4.60
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.60
Questions4.91
Shreyoshi Ghosh 15 reported responses 3.02Eval / 5
Overall3.02 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.60
Technology2.32
Synthesis2.85
Collaboration3.82
Connection2.78
Contribution3.03
Discussion2.65
Inclusivity3.09
Grading2.05
Reflection3.05
Respect3.67
Creativity3.25
Feedback2.32
Interaction4.31
Challenge2.74
Questions2.18
Muhammad Ali 15 reported responses 3.94Eval / 5
Overall3.94 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology3.70
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.80
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity3.70
Grading3.60
Reflection3.30
Respect4.10
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.40
Challenge3.90
Questions3.80
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.