Course record JRNL

JRNL 1000

Principles of Journalism and Networked Communication

University of Colorado Boulder

1,300 grades29 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score40/100
Mixed record

Professors 29 of 29

David Ross Taylor 368 grades · 1 term 3.49GPA
67.9% A
22.8% B
6.3% C
1.6% D
1.4% F

368 letter grades

Compare with the course
Taylor vs. the course average
A +7.9
B −4.3
C −2.4
D −0.1
F −1.2

Difference in percentage points.

2.9% withdrew · 11 of 379 enrolled.

Thomas H Yulsman 486 grades · 1 term 3.43GPA
63.8% A
23.5% B
8.8% C
1.6% D
2.3% F

486 letter grades

Compare with the course
Yulsman vs. the course average
A +3.8
B −3.6
C +0.2
D same
F −0.3

Difference in percentage points.

2.6% withdrew · 13 of 499 enrolled.

Christine M Larson 446 grades · 1 term 3.21GPA
49.3% A
34.5% B
10.5% C
1.8% D
3.8% F

446 letter grades

Compare with the course
Larson vs. the course average
A −10.7
B +7.5
C +1.8
D +0.1
F +1.3

Difference in percentage points.

4.1% withdrew · 19 of 465 enrolled.

Devon Corman 29 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5

29 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.42
Collaboration4.43
Connection4.80
Contribution4.61
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.10
Reflection4.53
Respect4.62
Creativity4.45
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.42
Questions4.60
Tom Yulsman 168 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5

168 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.66
Technology4.61
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.84
Contribution4.04
Discussion4.46
Inclusivity4.76
Grading4.24
Reflection4.56
Respect4.81
Creativity4.47
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.54
Challenge4.51
Questions4.63
Rania Ms Al Namara 74 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5

74 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.13
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.45
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity4.36
Grading4.24
Reflection4.35
Respect4.67
Creativity4.34
Feedback3.89
Interaction4.52
Challenge4.30
Questions4.29
Tamm Matthews 10 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.85
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading3.60
Reflection4.75
Respect4.65
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.65
Questions4.50
Sima R Bhowmik 18 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.15
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity4.20
Grading3.90
Reflection4.15
Respect4.55
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.15
Challenge4.25
Questions4.35
Jackson Reed 5 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.20
Connection5.00
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.40
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Michael Louis Worchel 4 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.30
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Kathleen Inez Alaimo 5 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.40
Connection4.80
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.60
Reflection4.20
Respect4.80
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.20
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.20
Questions4.60
Keyana Simone 16 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.15
Connection4.55
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.55
Reflection4.30
Respect4.85
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.50
Questions4.35
Nicola Jana Redl 18 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.24
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.42
Connection4.55
Contribution4.56
Discussion4.22
Inclusivity4.57
Grading3.86
Reflection4.29
Respect4.67
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.14
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.17
Questions4.16
Ashley Carter 11 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.85
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.95
Grading4.90
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Ross Taylor 169 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

169 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration3.99
Connection4.93
Contribution4.28
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity4.76
Grading4.63
Reflection4.70
Respect4.84
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.56
Questions4.80
Hun Shik Kim 2 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.50
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback3.50
Challenge5.00
Questions3.50
Nihal Alaqabawy 38 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5

38 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.21
Technology3.87
Synthesis3.83
Collaboration4.02
Connection4.20
Contribution4.08
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.38
Grading4.01
Reflection4.32
Respect4.65
Creativity4.01
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.13
Questions4.52
Shreyoshi Ghosh 60 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5

60 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.44
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.58
Contribution4.32
Discussion4.47
Inclusivity4.66
Grading4.25
Reflection4.39
Respect4.59
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.29
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.32
Questions4.63
Wen Lei 55 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

55 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.49
Technology4.41
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.31
Connection4.72
Contribution4.27
Discussion4.48
Inclusivity4.68
Grading4.34
Reflection4.51
Respect4.69
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.61
Challenge4.37
Questions4.55
Patrick Richard Ferrucci 5 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.99
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration4.77
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.99
Grading4.98
Reflection4.78
Respect4.78
Creativity4.99
Feedback3.20
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.78
Questions5.00
Andrew Peter Sturt 14 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.75
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.55
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.65
Questions4.85
Qiongye Chen 34 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

34 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.64
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.61
Collaboration4.49
Connection4.89
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.69
Reflection4.77
Respect4.83
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.68
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.58
Questions4.74
Carl Knauf 48 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5

48 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.82
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.52
Connection4.85
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.88
Reflection4.88
Respect4.93
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.90
Questions4.91
Gabe Allen 20 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.30
Connection5.00
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.70
Reflection4.60
Respect4.85
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Hina Ali 42 reported responses 4.02Eval / 5
Overall4.02 / 5

42 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.94
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration3.98
Connection4.29
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.21
Inclusivity4.32
Grading3.95
Reflection3.94
Respect4.60
Creativity3.94
Feedback3.87
Interaction4.12
Challenge3.74
Questions4.32
Dennis Okeke 54 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

54 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.54
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.72
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.04
Reflection4.65
Respect4.76
Creativity4.34
Feedback4.08
Interaction4.59
Challenge4.46
Questions4.53
Stanley Karombo 33 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

33 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.39
Connection4.59
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.63
Grading3.95
Reflection4.59
Respect4.60
Creativity4.43
Feedback3.79
Interaction4.57
Challenge4.55
Questions4.40
Huda Asiri 235 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5

235 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.70
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.68
Grading4.35
Reflection4.28
Respect4.62
Creativity4.02
Feedback3.83
Interaction4.48
Challenge4.35
Questions4.48
Angelica Lolita Kalika 234 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

234 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.70
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.68
Grading4.40
Reflection4.28
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.48
Challenge4.55
Questions4.65
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.