Course record JPNS
JPNS 2110
Intermediate Japanese 1
University of Colorado Boulder
245 grades14 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score37/100
Below average
Hisako Schibli 54 grades · 1 term 3.31GPA
54 letter grades
Compare with the course
Schibli vs. the course average
A
+11.7
B
−1.5
C
−4.6
D
−2.9
F
−2.6
Difference in percentage points.
5.3% withdrew · 3 of 57 enrolled.
Overall4.72 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.43
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.77
Reflection4.63
Respect4.80
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.77
Questions4.80
Kiyomi Kawakami 49 grades · 1 term 3.02GPA
49 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kawakami vs. the course average
A
−3.3
B
+4.1
C
−1.6
D
+1.2
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
5.8% withdrew · 3 of 52 enrolled.
Overall4.64 / 5
45 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.25
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.44
Reflection4.77
Respect4.51
Creativity4.78
Feedback4.44
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.65
Questions4.79
Yumiko Matsunaga 106 grades · 1 term 3.02GPA
106 letter grades
Compare with the course
Matsunaga vs. the course average
A
+1.4
B
−2.8
C
−1.6
D
+0.9
F
+2.1
Difference in percentage points.
2.8% withdrew · 3 of 109 enrolled.
Overall4.78 / 5
79 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.88
Technology4.61
Synthesis4.51
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.58
Contribution4.71
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.34
Grading4.77
Reflection4.68
Respect4.75
Creativity4.39
Feedback4.71
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.68
Questions4.87
Megan L Husby 36 grades · 1 term 2.81GPA
36 letter grades
Compare with the course
Husby vs. the course average
A
−17.0
B
+4.9
C
+13.9
D
−0.1
F
−1.7
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 36 enrolled.
Overall4.46 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.09
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.31
Collaboration4.99
Connection4.73
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.57
Reflection4.70
Respect4.75
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.68
Interaction4.71
Challenge4.87
Questions4.69
Jordan Nichole Knowles 6 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Alana Alexis Brack 8 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.90
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.40
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.40
Questions4.60
Cassidy Younggreen 7 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.90
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Catherine Miki Otachime 19 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.97
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.27
Contribution4.07
Discussion4.43
Inclusivity4.37
Grading4.80
Reflection4.63
Respect4.87
Creativity4.37
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.67
Sixuan Lu 22 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.43
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.53
Reflection4.63
Respect4.77
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.47
Questions4.83
Raisa Stebbins 28 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.40
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.80
Reflection4.55
Respect4.75
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.95
Ann Yoshinaga 17 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.50
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Yukiko Asano 57 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
57 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.04
Technology4.28
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.04
Contribution3.97
Discussion3.75
Inclusivity4.06
Grading4.16
Reflection4.40
Respect4.27
Creativity4.46
Feedback4.22
Interaction4.66
Challenge4.54
Questions3.91
Nyla Schaberg 40 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.97
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration4.83
Connection3.97
Contribution4.17
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.57
Reflection4.40
Respect4.77
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.63
Questions4.77
Taoxuan Xu 17 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.10
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.50
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.