Course record JPNS
JPNS 1010
Beginning Japanese 1
University of Colorado Boulder
635 grades26 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score35/100
Below average
Andre Joaquin Martinez 34 grades · 1 term 3.46GPA
34 letter grades
Compare with the course
Martinez vs. the course average
A
+13.6
B
−3.7
C
+0.2
D
−3.3
F
−6.8
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 34 enrolled.
Overall4.55 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.60
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.45
Reflection4.60
Respect4.95
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.75
Questions4.95
Yumiko Matsunaga 72 grades · 1 term 3.15GPA
72 letter grades
Compare with the course
Matsunaga vs. the course average
A
+6.0
B
−2.2
C
−3.4
D
−0.5
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
4.0% withdrew · 3 of 75 enrolled.
Overall4.63 / 5
175 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology4.54
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration4.78
Connection4.20
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity3.96
Grading4.65
Reflection4.55
Respect4.87
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.74
Questions4.74
Hisako Schibli 131 grades · 1 term 3.07GPA
131 letter grades
Compare with the course
Schibli vs. the course average
A
+7.5
B
−10.5
C
+2.3
D
+0.5
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
5.1% withdrew · 7 of 138 enrolled.
Overall4.69 / 5
101 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.08
Technology4.81
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.44
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.41
Grading4.81
Reflection4.69
Respect4.88
Creativity4.71
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.74
Questions4.93
Kiyomi Kawakami 130 grades · 1 term 3.01GPA
130 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kawakami vs. the course average
A
+0.3
B
+0.4
C
−2.9
D
−0.2
F
+2.5
Difference in percentage points.
7.1% withdrew · 10 of 140 enrolled.
Overall4.66 / 5
59 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.13
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.24
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.33
Contribution4.14
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity3.94
Grading4.73
Reflection4.58
Respect4.66
Creativity4.56
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.78
Questions4.72
Yukiko Asano 115 grades · 1 term 2.98GPA
115 letter grades
Compare with the course
Asano vs. the course average
A
−7.3
B
+7.5
C
+1.2
D
−0.7
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
10.2% withdrew · 13 of 128 enrolled.
Overall4.21 / 5
143 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.56
Technology4.29
Synthesis3.93
Collaboration4.88
Connection3.87
Contribution3.92
Discussion4.16
Inclusivity3.72
Grading4.17
Reflection4.23
Respect4.53
Creativity3.99
Feedback4.27
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.69
Questions4.39
Megan L Husby 119 grades · 1 term 2.86GPA
119 letter grades
Compare with the course
Husby vs. the course average
A
−10.4
B
+5.5
C
+3.2
D
+2.6
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
7.8% withdrew · 10 of 129 enrolled.
Overall4.69 / 5
60 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.42
Technology4.74
Synthesis3.94
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.22
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.93
Reflection4.38
Respect4.96
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.49
Questions4.96
Mikhail Skovoronskikh 16 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.46GPA
16 letter grades · Limited sample
11.1% withdrew · 2 of 18 enrolled.
Overall4.63 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.40
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.60
Reflection4.80
Respect4.40
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.80
Questions4.70
Eriko Yatabe-Waldock 18 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.96GPA
18 letter grades · Limited sample
5.3% withdrew · 1 of 19 enrolled.
Overall4.86 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.60
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.90
Grading5.00
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Akane Elizabeth Kleinkopf 66 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
66 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.31
Contribution4.13
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.13
Grading4.72
Reflection4.45
Respect4.91
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.81
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.68
Questions4.85
Emma Von Der Linn 68 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
68 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.64
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.18
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.28
Contribution4.07
Discussion4.76
Inclusivity4.11
Grading4.77
Reflection4.42
Respect4.87
Creativity4.59
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.77
Questions4.90
Sijia Li 35 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.30
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.15
Reflection4.60
Respect4.85
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Jordan Nichole Knowles 51 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
51 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.71
Technology4.21
Synthesis4.17
Collaboration4.65
Connection3.82
Contribution3.73
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.51
Reflection4.41
Respect4.71
Creativity3.74
Feedback4.39
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.38
Questions4.77
Zike Ren 12 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.30
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.00
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.20
Reflection4.20
Respect4.70
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.30
Questions4.50
Raisa Stebbins 18 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.76
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.98
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.95
Reflection4.41
Respect4.98
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.97
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.78
Questions4.97
Haruka Fujii 11 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.55
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Gabriel Zhou Hooper 30 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.08
Technology4.54
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.94
Connection4.55
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.63
Reflection4.84
Respect4.88
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.56
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.71
Questions4.78
Taoxuan Xu 19 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.66
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.37
Contribution4.24
Discussion4.17
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.81
Reflection4.79
Respect4.21
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.32
Interaction4.52
Challenge4.87
Questions4.89
Brandon Edwards 53 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
53 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.77
Technology4.48
Synthesis4.01
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.06
Contribution4.13
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.13
Grading4.40
Reflection4.36
Respect4.79
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.68
Questions4.87
Evelyn Emery 44 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.20
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity3.93
Grading4.68
Reflection4.56
Respect4.70
Creativity4.32
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.59
Questions4.81
Juliana Paula Picanco Stracciolano Valverde 44 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.20
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity3.93
Grading4.70
Reflection4.56
Respect4.81
Creativity4.64
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.69
Questions4.75
Lillith Jackson 20 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology4.88
Synthesis3.88
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.17
Contribution4.28
Discussion4.42
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.34
Reflection4.45
Respect4.72
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.46
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.72
Questions4.57
Nyla Schaberg 17 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.10
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
Jerry Park Piao 16 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.10
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.60
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.40
Questions4.90
Bergen Grant 13 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.30
Contribution4.20
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.70
Respect4.30
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.80
Ayako Yamaguchi 14 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.30
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.50
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Vincent Burnett 12 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.80
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.80
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.10
Grading4.20
Reflection4.20
Respect4.80
Creativity3.50
Feedback4.20
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.10
Questions4.80
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.