Course record IPHY
IPHY 4650
Exercise Physiology
University of Colorado Boulder
971 grades29 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score43/100
Mixed record
Christopher A Desouza 290 grades · 1 term 3.40GPA
290 letter grades
Compare with the course
Desouza vs. the course average
A
+14.3
B
+4.0
C
−15.4
D
−2.5
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
0.7% withdrew · 2 of 292 enrolled.
Overall4.32 / 5
165 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.29
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.09
Connection4.90
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.66
Inclusivity4.51
Grading4.59
Reflection4.89
Respect4.79
Creativity4.31
Feedback4.22
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.81
Questions4.76
Sewan Kim 380 grades · 1 term 2.93GPA
380 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kim vs. the course average
A
−0.7
B
−5.6
C
+5.9
D
+0.7
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
2.1% withdrew · 8 of 388 enrolled.
Overall4.71 / 5
353 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.79
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.76
Collaboration4.71
Connection4.87
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.75
Reflection4.77
Respect4.83
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.31
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.81
Questions4.78
Robert Mazzeo 93 grades · 1 term 2.81GPA
93 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mazzeo vs. the course average
A
−11.6
B
+1.7
C
+11.0
D
−0.3
F
−0.8
Difference in percentage points.
2.1% withdrew · 2 of 95 enrolled.
Teresa E. Foley 208 grades · 1 term 2.70GPA
208 letter grades
Compare with the course
Foley vs. the course average
A
−13.5
B
+3.9
C
+5.7
D
+2.3
F
+1.6
Difference in percentage points.
0.5% withdrew · 1 of 209 enrolled.
Overall4.59 / 5
74 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.90
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.48
Grading4.45
Reflection4.75
Respect4.80
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.75
Questions4.78
Amanda Nicole Mercer 20 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.01
Collaboration4.18
Connection4.70
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.33
Grading4.92
Reflection4.71
Respect4.82
Creativity4.37
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.71
Challenge4.70
Questions4.92
Christian Knobloch 8 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.40
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.60
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.80
Questions4.60
Lillian Madden Brewster 40 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.87
Synthesis4.44
Collaboration4.78
Connection4.90
Contribution4.66
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.47
Grading4.79
Reflection4.70
Respect4.83
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.66
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.82
Questions4.92
Narissa Parichabut Mccarty 15 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration4.01
Connection4.95
Contribution4.07
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.53
Grading4.95
Reflection4.65
Respect4.85
Creativity4.72
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.69
Challenge4.72
Questions4.95
Alysha A Gleason 19 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.29
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.58
Connection4.84
Contribution3.32
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.18
Grading4.58
Reflection4.88
Respect5.00
Creativity4.36
Feedback4.95
Interaction3.22
Challenge4.40
Questions5.00
Alysha Taylor Gleason 14 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.65
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.65
Reflection4.55
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.85
Ravinandan Venkatasubramanian 16 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.88
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.88
Collaboration4.97
Connection4.92
Contribution4.59
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.92
Grading4.47
Reflection4.79
Respect4.95
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.69
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.60
Questions4.96
Grace Susan Maurer 23 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.73
Contribution4.71
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.69
Grading4.76
Reflection4.81
Respect4.91
Creativity4.39
Feedback4.79
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.66
Questions4.51
Albert Angiolillo 41 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.87
Collaboration4.92
Connection4.91
Contribution4.72
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.89
Grading4.87
Reflection4.95
Respect4.96
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.88
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.92
Questions4.95
Alysha Taylor Bogard 33 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology4.97
Synthesis4.88
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.93
Contribution4.93
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.64
Grading4.97
Reflection4.93
Respect4.92
Creativity4.68
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.95
Questions4.95
Aviva Pollet 66 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
66 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.74
Collaboration4.92
Connection4.84
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.87
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.78
Feedback4.79
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.89
Questions4.91
Robbie Courter 31 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.92
Synthesis4.64
Collaboration4.96
Connection4.91
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.86
Reflection4.81
Respect5.00
Creativity4.68
Feedback4.91
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.92
Questions4.92
Madden Brewster 6 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.60
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.70
Luis Morata Moreno 11 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.70
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.45
Reflection4.80
Respect4.85
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.75
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.40
Questions4.95
Ben Kott 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Leah Deminski 29 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.89
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.88
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.94
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.98
Grading4.78
Reflection4.94
Respect4.98
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.94
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.82
Questions5.00
Bradley Needles 30 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.97
Synthesis4.42
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.92
Contribution4.76
Discussion4.99
Inclusivity4.43
Grading4.84
Reflection4.92
Respect4.99
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.97
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.65
Questions4.99
Sajjad Daneshgar Asl 8 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.60
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.40
Reflection4.40
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Thomas Mcdaniel 28 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.92
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.96
Connection4.88
Contribution4.81
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.96
Reflection4.70
Respect4.89
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.86
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Auburn Berry 23 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.86
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.62
Connection4.93
Contribution4.52
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.16
Grading4.87
Reflection4.93
Respect4.77
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.84
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.70
Questions4.94
Whitney Valenti 49 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.87
Synthesis4.86
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.93
Contribution4.87
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.92
Grading4.87
Reflection4.88
Respect4.93
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.86
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.92
Questions4.85
Kate Noyes 55 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
55 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.51
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.76
Contribution4.72
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.74
Grading4.74
Reflection4.73
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.75
Questions4.79
Joshua Holzer 46 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
46 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.92
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.91
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.91
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.84
Grading4.92
Reflection4.89
Respect4.70
Creativity4.91
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.92
Questions4.77
Peyton Johnson 33 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology4.76
Synthesis4.71
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.85
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.76
Grading4.83
Reflection4.92
Respect4.85
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.68
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.78
Questions4.79
Grace Johnston 16 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.80
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.38
Inclusivity4.43
Grading4.50
Reflection4.63
Respect4.55
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.35
Questions4.22
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.