Course record IPHY
IPHY 4440
Endocrinology
University of Colorado Boulder
1,230 grades19 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score32/100
Below average
Christopher Lowry Ph.D. 372 grades · 1 term 3.07GPA
372 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ph.D. vs. the course average
A
+12.5
B
−2.2
C
−6.2
D
−3.4
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
2.4% withdrew · 9 of 381 enrolled.
Teresa E. Foley 430 grades · 1 term 2.75GPA
430 letter grades
Compare with the course
Foley vs. the course average
A
−1.7
B
+1.0
C
same
D
+0.3
F
+0.4
Difference in percentage points.
2.7% withdrew · 12 of 442 enrolled.
Overall4.77 / 5
258 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.95
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.91
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.98
Contribution4.89
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.92
Reflection4.97
Respect4.98
Creativity4.86
Feedback4.89
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.95
Questions4.92
Pei-San Tsai 315 grades · 1 term 2.66GPA
315 letter grades
Compare with the course
Tsai vs. the course average
A
−5.7
B
+1.9
C
+0.8
D
+2.2
F
+0.9
Difference in percentage points.
3.7% withdrew · 12 of 327 enrolled.
Overall4.35 / 5
336 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.41
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration4.18
Connection4.68
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.31
Grading4.48
Reflection4.70
Respect4.64
Creativity4.28
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.71
Questions4.75
Janet L Casagrand 113 grades · 1 term 2.40GPA
113 letter grades
Compare with the course
Casagrand vs. the course average
A
−19.0
B
−1.7
C
+18.5
D
+4.0
F
−1.8
Difference in percentage points.
2.6% withdrew · 3 of 116 enrolled.
Overall4.00 / 5
57 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.17
Technology3.19
Synthesis4.04
Collaboration3.22
Connection3.98
Contribution3.33
Discussion3.22
Inclusivity3.67
Grading2.98
Reflection3.56
Respect4.57
Creativity4.43
Feedback2.78
Interaction4.23
Challenge4.21
Questions3.10
Larissa Hunt 48 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
48 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.22
Connection4.58
Contribution4.52
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.78
Reflection4.78
Respect4.98
Creativity4.66
Feedback4.62
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.74
Questions4.96
Jeremie Kautzmann 47 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
47 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.57
Contribution4.83
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.77
Reflection4.73
Respect4.97
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.73
Questions4.97
Kelsey Marie Loupy 77 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
77 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.56
Technology4.74
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.56
Contribution4.66
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.74
Reflection4.82
Respect4.96
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.54
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.74
Questions4.84
John Davis Sterrett 14 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology3.50
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.60
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.90
Grading3.70
Reflection4.20
Respect4.80
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.10
Questions4.40
Katrina Rodheim 24 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.25
Connection4.20
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.90
Reflection4.85
Respect4.95
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.55
Questions4.50
Surayut Kluaiphanngam 137 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
137 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.56
Collaboration4.47
Connection4.30
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.66
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.54
Reflection4.70
Respect4.86
Creativity4.41
Feedback4.38
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.59
Questions4.63
Christopher Lowry 494 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
494 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.59
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.48
Connection4.85
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.54
Grading4.66
Reflection4.76
Respect4.79
Creativity4.52
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.77
Questions4.76
Logan Jay Bunch 41 reported responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.30
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration4.25
Connection4.00
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity4.05
Grading4.30
Reflection4.10
Respect4.55
Creativity4.15
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.15
Questions4.35
Elle Orie 58 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
58 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.13
Connection4.50
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.83
Grading4.50
Reflection4.57
Respect4.87
Creativity4.27
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.50
Questions4.67
Lila Burnley 38 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.42
Contribution4.66
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity4.52
Grading4.72
Reflection4.82
Respect4.88
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.34
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.62
Questions4.86
Logan Edward Weinman 2 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution3.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Nora Want 9 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.85
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.65
Reflection5.00
Respect4.80
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Joshua Jackson 67 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5
67 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.18
Collaboration4.58
Connection4.35
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.13
Grading4.05
Reflection4.53
Respect4.35
Creativity4.03
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.18
Questions4.18
Chimere Ndudim 252 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
252 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.59
Connection4.60
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.76
Inclusivity4.56
Grading4.59
Reflection4.80
Respect4.82
Creativity4.59
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.72
Questions4.82
Kate Noyes 3 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.70
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.30
Questions4.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.