Course record IPHY
IPHY 3435
Physiology Lab
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable42 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score77/100
Strong
Sajjad Daneshgar Asl 55 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
55 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.64
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration4.96
Connection4.50
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity3.68
Grading4.19
Reflection4.63
Respect4.71
Creativity4.23
Feedback4.12
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.71
Questions4.85
Nathan Thomas Greenberg 28 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.91
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.96
Connection4.63
Contribution4.74
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity4.33
Grading4.64
Reflection4.76
Respect4.98
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.71
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.84
Questions4.70
Sachi Wong 70 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
70 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.79
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.89
Connection4.81
Contribution4.84
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.48
Grading4.91
Reflection4.89
Respect4.93
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.86
Questions4.95
Kelly Anne Stockelman 16 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.75
Contribution4.95
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.90
Reflection4.75
Respect5.00
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.95
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.95
Questions4.95
Mina Katariina Griffioen 25 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.84
Connection4.83
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.16
Grading4.50
Reflection4.71
Respect4.85
Creativity4.59
Feedback4.79
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.67
Questions4.69
Eamonn Duffy 15 reported responses 3.79Eval / 5
Overall3.79 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology3.57
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.37
Contribution4.30
Discussion3.33
Inclusivity3.03
Grading2.93
Reflection3.90
Respect4.00
Creativity4.10
Feedback2.93
Interaction4.47
Challenge3.97
Questions2.90
Trace Jablin 13 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.34
Technology4.88
Synthesis3.66
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.57
Contribution4.41
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.53
Reflection4.49
Respect4.88
Creativity3.79
Feedback4.46
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.21
Questions4.88
Alanna Mayberry 79 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
79 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.86
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.74
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.84
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.32
Grading4.78
Reflection4.85
Respect4.94
Creativity4.79
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.88
Questions4.75
Christian Knobloch 9 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.90
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.05
Grading4.60
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Kelsey Elaine Jordan Koger 13 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.65
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.95
Reflection4.70
Respect4.95
Creativity4.65
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.85
Questions4.85
Hannah Kelsey Fandl 51 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5
51 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.79
Technology4.71
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration4.96
Connection4.82
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.59
Grading4.77
Reflection4.84
Respect4.82
Creativity4.66
Feedback4.87
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.86
Questions4.93
Siena Krueger 114 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
114 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.45
Contribution4.72
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.29
Grading4.08
Reflection4.67
Respect4.80
Creativity4.54
Feedback4.54
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.57
Questions4.62
Luke William Desmond 112 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
112 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.54
Collaboration4.99
Connection4.69
Contribution4.84
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.68
Reflection4.76
Respect4.93
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.80
Questions4.92
Georgia K Reis 13 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.40
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.70
Grading5.00
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Gabriela Briana Diaz 28 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.50
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.85
Reflection4.75
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.70
Questions4.65
Mckinley Coppock 16 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.60
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.80
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Jia Shi 23 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.92
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.92
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.93
Contribution4.93
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.82
Grading4.83
Reflection4.99
Respect4.73
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.83
Questions4.93
Sidney Aki 54 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
54 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.61
Technology4.76
Synthesis4.64
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.74
Contribution4.81
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.49
Reflection4.72
Respect4.92
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.72
Questions4.70
Logan Edward Weinman 74 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
74 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.88
Technology4.91
Synthesis4.83
Collaboration4.97
Connection4.88
Contribution4.92
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.54
Grading4.76
Reflection4.89
Respect4.72
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.83
Questions4.88
Tel Kelley 92 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
92 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.94
Synthesis4.74
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.80
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.89
Reflection4.82
Respect4.93
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.96
Questions4.98
Riley Morgenthaler 92 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
92 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.83
Technology4.87
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.96
Connection4.87
Contribution4.83
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.32
Grading4.91
Reflection4.98
Respect4.74
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.91
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.95
Questions4.98
Ceann Udovich 15 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.28
Technology4.90
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration4.54
Connection4.24
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.85
Reflection4.36
Respect4.93
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.92
Questions4.92
Thomas Hembree 30 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.49
Collaboration4.89
Connection4.74
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.27
Grading4.99
Reflection4.93
Respect4.95
Creativity4.86
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.93
Questions4.91
Kyo Lee 122 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
122 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.79
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.83
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity4.66
Grading4.81
Reflection4.92
Respect4.89
Creativity4.92
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.93
Questions4.73
Liam Mcgill 28 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.55
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.50
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.75
Questions4.85
Miguel Espino 150 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
150 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.74
Synthesis4.61
Collaboration4.97
Connection4.82
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.54
Grading4.77
Reflection4.81
Respect4.95
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.71
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.80
Questions4.88
Sean Hiramatsu 49 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.92
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.82
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity3.92
Grading4.81
Reflection4.83
Respect4.88
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.96
Challenge5.00
Questions4.87
Krisha Avalani 33 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.36
Collaboration4.81
Connection4.62
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity3.98
Grading4.67
Reflection4.66
Respect4.63
Creativity4.39
Feedback4.62
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.66
Questions4.78
Leen Abbas 26 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.80
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.75
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.85
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.95
Lila Burnley 21 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.60
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.55
Grading4.40
Reflection4.60
Respect4.65
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.55
Questions4.60
Ashley Darrah 29 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.89
Technology4.96
Synthesis4.94
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.81
Contribution4.94
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity4.28
Grading4.89
Reflection4.98
Respect4.98
Creativity4.70
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.98
Questions4.98
Andy Castellano 101 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
101 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.79
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.69
Contribution4.83
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.24
Grading4.76
Reflection4.66
Respect4.87
Creativity4.71
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.78
Questions4.87
Shelby Lee Hopkins 21 reported responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.85
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.40
Grading5.00
Reflection4.70
Respect4.95
Creativity4.75
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Andrea Lugo 27 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.35
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect4.95
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.85
Questions4.85
Luke Hendricks 65 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
65 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.91
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.77
Contribution4.89
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.47
Grading4.86
Reflection4.87
Respect4.80
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.84
Questions4.92
Brennyn Lewis 59 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5
59 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.80
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.93
Reflection4.83
Respect4.88
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.97
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.93
Questions4.93
Tiya Chamberlin 24 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.80
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.65
Grading4.45
Reflection4.80
Respect4.75
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.75
Questions5.00
Norah Nyangau 49 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.38
Synthesis4.16
Collaboration4.79
Connection4.12
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.34
Inclusivity4.03
Grading4.06
Reflection4.30
Respect4.60
Creativity3.85
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.18
Questions4.30
Jingcheng Jiang 49 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.74
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.58
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.34
Grading4.65
Reflection4.78
Respect4.88
Creativity4.54
Feedback4.49
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.74
Questions4.67
Michelle Lupa 22 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.60
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.90
Reflection4.75
Respect4.60
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Jennifer Lawrence 44 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.99
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.83
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.99
Reflection4.85
Respect4.85
Creativity4.74
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.86
Questions4.91
Michelle Krystyna Oltean 5 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.75
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.75
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.